I admit I am suspicious of mediocre quality videos being released because it's keeping us in a middle ground where they are not good enough to be evidence of NHI / Exotic Tech but they are bad enough to become ammo for debunkers who create prosaic narratives which then get adopted by most outside the community. What I'm saying here is, are these videos even helping? If it isn't good enough to be undeniable but is bad enough to be ammo for debunkers is it actually damaging forward progress? If so, is it being done intentionally by the IC who are essentially using people who believe they are getting good Intel and are excited to be in the limelight? They may think they are getting legitimate Intel but perhaps they are actually (unknowingly) being used as methods through which the IC can keep this conversation at a lukewarm temperature? Just a thought is all.

@JeremyCorbell makes a point of emphasising that the object is shifting its heat signature multiple times but neglected to realise/mention that the surrounding environment (most prominent with the concrete barriers) is also shifting from black/white. It's the FLIR pod.

@TheProjectUnity tbf the video is more convincing than this pic

The "bird shit" memes were the "ammo for debunkers" you are making reference to I think. That was proven wrong, even mick west has abandoned it. We should fight back and point out the MISINFORMATION the debunkers are using. Truth and transparency is always the answer. What would you like for Corbell to NOT publish this video?

@TheProjectUnity The "emerging from water at high speed" part would have been the only part that would have convinced me of anything and of course, we can't see that?

@TheProjectUnity If people are dumb enough to blindly believe the debunkers, that’s on them.

@TheProjectUnity #MakeLoveNotWar w/ @JeremyCorbell @g_knapp? meanwhile #UFOTwitter fighting about @BobLazar0102 @ENERGY @arpaofficial @ARPAE @ORNL @timburchett? "@FBI's standing in front of the door open up"? #WindRiverStandOff youtube.com/watch?v=7AxWVL…

@TheProjectUnity My question is the most damning evidence of it taking off an insane speed is left out. Why?

@TheProjectUnity Jeremy Corbell is a business. Good bad indifferent. This is his shtick regardless of the intel being rock solid. He relies on the viewers to fuel his business.

These cases where the video quality is subpar…it's important to recognise that discussions around UFOs extend beyond convincing ardent debunkers. Debunkers will probably remain unconvinced until the very last moment (and even then may suggest the craft on the White House lawn is actually a seagull tangled up in a Starlink) but it's the mainstream audience that needs exposure.

@TheProjectUnity Brilliant take.

@TheProjectUnity Yes this has been my thought for a long time. And people who are always dialed to 11 with amped up excitement makes it hard for me to not take this very seriously.

@TheProjectUnity I agree @TheProjectUnity

@TheProjectUnity People will try and debunk anything realeased. A damn UfO could land on the White House lawn and people like Mick West would try and say it wasn’t real. So by this logic nothing would ever be released. I say release everything and let’s go at it.

@TheProjectUnity Agreed.

@TheProjectUnity It’s impossible to tell from photos, films & videos anymore, between CIA disinformation + idiotic hoaxers there are heaps of crap out there. The best evidence is the older evidence + the NASA photos that slipped past the Censors. Intelligence & morons are behind the majority

@TheProjectUnity Lol. I don’t know. 🐙🐙But we covered it in the live chat this morning! youtube.com/live/OvKrsROu8…

@TheProjectUnity Clearly a Zerg overlord

@TheProjectUnity Debunkers could have a UFO land on their lawn, and visitors come probe them every week, and they'd still make excuses why it's not real. There is no threshold of evidence high enough for people who don't want to believe in something that makes them uncomfortable.

@TheProjectUnity Not sure if related, still researching authenticity/context/details.

@TheProjectUnity Videos like these hurt the phenomenon. Videos will never stop the debunkers. We need first hand private sector scientists to come forward with evidence publicly. Also we need clarity on Abductions.

@TheProjectUnity @JeremyCorbell @g_knapp @BryceZabel @RossCoulthart: A SINGLE New Abductee Implant Extraction, w/ Perfect Provenance/Testing, is worth Every Last Video DOD Ever Collected, *combined*, in Re: Forcing Exposure. The Implants are *Entirely* In Our Control. Go Yank 100 More of Them!

@TheProjectUnity YES. The video shows something that could be a man made drone performing "conventional" flight characteristics, but then you get the "anonymous" claim about unconventional flight characteristics. The IC knows exactly wtf they're doing by leaking this... but does Corbell?

@TheProjectUnity twitter.com/ashleybranson0…

@TheProjectUnity I agree 💯 🔥, I think Corbell is needing material for weaponized

That is a very valid point and it is quite possible to be the truth. At this point I think the whole topic is stuck. Still relying on witness testimonies and blurry photos/videos which lead to absolutely nothing. But obtaining real evidence would require extensive amount of funding for research and expeditions which 99% of these people just do not have.

@TheProjectUnity i think this stuff is purposely being leaked to discredit the aliens theories etc.. this video imo proves nothing.. we assume too its sn alien.. as if we ever really know what intelligent life would look like anyways.. only evidence we have is from abductees witness accounts