CryptoBankSignals

I’ve fixed it, I had made an error in the previous list I published, I removed liquidity smart contracts and dead/burn addresses from the top 100 holders but not from the MHR and HHI calculations disclaimer: all these numbers are approximate, not 100% accurate, as projects are in constant fluctuation, but they can give you a clear overall view of the project’s distribution and concentration to help you understand better, I’ll explain the concepts of MHR (median holder rank) and HHI (herfindahl-hirschman Index), which reflect how distributed and concentrated a project is the MHR tells us at what position 50% of the tokens are held by holders a high MHR means that this 50% is distributed among many holders, which is positive for the project’s stability and decentralization if the MHR is low, it means that a few wallets control most of the tokens, which can be risky The HHI, on the other hand, measures how concentrated the token is a low HHI indicates good distribution and less concentration in a few wallets, reducing the risk of manipulation a high HHI means that a few holders have significant influence, which can bring volatility if they decide to sell large amounts In summary, a high MHR and a low HHI are ideal for a more stable and decentralized project you want to see: - high > MHR - low > HHI

Here is a pitch for every crypto publication: Cover Solona's growth like you would a MetaDEX on Base.

There has been a lot of talk about Solana flipping all EVM chains when it comes to volume. I decided to dig in to the quality of pools across top chains to see if this is a passing trend or a flippening of the incumbent. Join me down the rabbit hole 🧵👇

emissions aren’t scary they’re a constant redirection of resources toward people who are gonna grow aerodrome today unlike your favorite VC unlock coin this isn’t a value transfer to insiders with one foot out the door when done right, this outcome below is what you get

Base tier list. Don’t shoot the messenger.