OcaWorld 🔞
5.3K posts

OcaWorld 🔞 أُعيد تغريده

@goodandnormal @adrianthe402nd @Truthful_ast Unblock me and answer this one, you Bad and Abnormal coward.
English

@goodandnormal @adrianthe402nd @Truthful_ast Development of SLS began in 2011.
The Orion capsule has been in the works since 2006. It was kept from the previous Constellation program.
Of course, you don't care about any of those dates because your only interest is to attack SpaceX.
English

@goodandnormal @adrianthe402nd @Truthful_ast In case you were not aware, all NASA rockets are subcontracted to private companies.
Mercury and Gemini were McDonnell. Saturn V and SLS are Boeing, with Rocketdyne engines. Shuttle orbiter was Rockwell.
English

@OcaWorld @adrianthe402nd @Truthful_ast Oh? Why could we put humans in space faster than starship with Apollo 60 fucking years ago? If we’re equating programs. NASA has always been better than private leaches
English

People will still doubt and cry about Starship "failing" today due to the booster loss but V3 just performed the basics of a traditional operational launch on its first try!
Liftoff, stage sep, and payload deploy (the heaviest payload since 1987)
SpaceX@SpaceX
Views of Starship in space from a @Starlink satellite
English

@goodandnormal @Dkirk003 @Truthful_ast Your argument is that Starship ought to "successfully" launch a lunar lander, anything else about the vehicle be damned.
But that's not where the engineers are aiming.
English

@goodandnormal @Dkirk003 @Truthful_ast Nice try. Even if I argue that the engineering goals were fulfilled in today's launch (test the stack, do a successful suborbital flight, land an intact ship in the ocean), you won't accept that because your argument isn't related to that at all.
English

@goodandnormal @adrianthe402nd @Truthful_ast Again with the "human rated" thing. They have to fly a number of these things before they can put any crew in them.
Would you be saying this about Falcon in 2010? Probably.
English

@goodandnormal @adrianthe402nd @Truthful_ast It's from last October.
And, again, drop the antiquated "internet meanie" thing.
English

@goodandnormal @adrianthe402nd @Truthful_ast So Starship ought to be a lunar launch vehicle EXCLUSIVELY, instead of testing if it can also serve as a satellite launch system?
Why? SLS already does that mission.
English

@OcaWorld @adrianthe402nd @Truthful_ast SpaceX is not fulfilling the contract THANK YOU for proving me right you absolute moron. Elon is building pez dispensers for his useless satellites when he should be doing exactly what YOU posted
English

@OcaWorld @adrianthe402nd @Truthful_ast So what does that document have to do with what SpaceX is NOT doing? They are not building a human rated spacecraft? In all of their propaganda there is no talk of building something for humans?
English

@goodandnormal @ScottLikedSLS @Booster__14 How long have we been on SLS? 12-15 years?
And how is it not impressive? While most launch systems are dinky little things, this is a fully reusable rocket bigger than the Saturn V.
English

@ScottLikedSLS @Booster__14 *when it flies* We are what, 5-6 years into this thing? Elon said it would be on Mars like last year. Nothing about this is impressive or inspiring. It’s a taxpayer funded launch system for bigger Starlink. Nothing more nothing less
English

@goodandnormal @Dkirk003 @Truthful_ast The receipts are "the rocket flies and lands nominally". If you were to judge it on the SLS's performance alone, this is a better system.
English

@Dkirk003 @Truthful_ast Elon Musk has literally been talking about this shit for over a decade. I’m sorry man that answer doesn’t pass muster. I have receipts too. If you’re gonna dickride that hard for him you better show receipts
English

@goodandnormal @adrianthe402nd @Truthful_ast Here, have something to read.
nodis3.gsfc.nasa.gov/npg_img/N_PR_8…
English

@goodandnormal @adrianthe402nd @Truthful_ast You can drop the "internet tough guy" thing. Start by making actual arguments instead of babbling "im right cuz i say so! also human rated!"
English

@goodandnormal @adrianthe402nd @Truthful_ast And a pressurized interior doesn't mean that a vehicle can accommodate a crew.
Cygnus, HTV and the retired ATV have pressurized cargo interiors, but none of them can carry a crew.

English

@goodandnormal @adrianthe402nd @Truthful_ast No, that is not what it means. "Human-rating" is a clearance NASA gives to a launch system.
As of today, Starship is a TEST VEHICLE. Why would it be furnished?
Unlike Truthful's unproductive "lmao" replies, I want to take your claims seriously, but you do not make it easy.
English





