Bulliever4Ever

2.8K posts

Bulliever4Ever banner
Bulliever4Ever

Bulliever4Ever

@Bulliever4Ever

Beigetreten Eylül 2015
308 Folgt392 Follower
Bulliever4Ever retweetet
Srini
Srini@0xSrini·
2021: bad crypto infra, less gaming, more tokens and farms 2026: great crypto UX that works and AI makes building 100x faster different era entirely. the interesting stuff is just getting started.
gwilym@wmpeaster

x.com/i/article/2036…

English
7
16
22
736
Bulliever4Ever retweetet
Srini
Srini@0xSrini·
remember the yeti penguin game? one of our community members rebuilt it with a bull vs bear twist. Its so fun 😂 bull-strike.beyondplay.xyz
English
7
10
13
353
Bulliever4Ever retweetet
Srini
Srini@0xSrini·
most people playing games from our shared links are on mobile so we just shipped a device preview mode in @BeyondPlay_xyz studio
English
6
13
23
771
Bulliever4Ever retweetet
Srini
Srini@0xSrini·
generation is getting there fast. verifiable fun is the harder problem. and the one worth solving.
Srini@0xSrini

the next frontier for gaming isn't generating with ai it's knowing whether the game is actually fun recursive self-improvement works when the loop is clean: experiment, measure, improve, repeat. that's why AI is eating coding benchmarks and math proofs. the answer is right or it isn't. games don't work like that. "fun" isn't a metric. you can't unit test whether a jump feels satisfying. a game can be technically perfect and still feel dead. this is the honest challenge, the gap between AI generated playable and "worth playing" is taste. and taste doesn't fit in a loss function. verifiable fun > that's the problem worth solving. still WIP at @BeyondPlay_xyz

English
0
4
5
140
Bulliever4Ever retweetet
Srini
Srini@0xSrini·
the next frontier for gaming isn't generating with ai it's knowing whether the game is actually fun recursive self-improvement works when the loop is clean: experiment, measure, improve, repeat. that's why AI is eating coding benchmarks and math proofs. the answer is right or it isn't. games don't work like that. "fun" isn't a metric. you can't unit test whether a jump feels satisfying. a game can be technically perfect and still feel dead. this is the honest challenge, the gap between AI generated playable and "worth playing" is taste. and taste doesn't fit in a loss function. verifiable fun > that's the problem worth solving. still WIP at @BeyondPlay_xyz
English
7
12
18
589
Bulliever4Ever retweetet
Srini
Srini@0xSrini·
crypto trained founders to optimise for getting picked not for building something people actually want refreshing to see someone call it out if you are building in crypto for too long, unlearn everything from the past 👇 shipping and retention > everything else
Pareen@pareen

x.com/i/article/2032…

English
1
4
9
252
Bulliever4Ever retweetet
Srini
Srini@0xSrini·
2030 games become how a generation tells stories games become the new social post games become the internet's native language you describe an idea. it exists. someone plays it. whoever builds the platform for that wins
Peter H. Diamandis, MD@PeterDiamandis

If You're an Entrepreneur: Stop designing businesses for 2024 scarcity. Design for 2030 abundance. Assume intelligence is free, energy is unlimited, and robotic labor costs pennies per hour. What becomes possible that's impossible today?

English
0
4
8
550
Bulliever4Ever retweetet
Srini
Srini@0xSrini·
vibe coding isn't a developer thing anymore games. legal docs. financial models. drug discovery. every domain that runs on logic is next
vittorio@IterIntellectus

this is actually insane > be tech guy in australia > adopt cancer riddled rescue dog, months to live > not_going_to_give_you_up.mp4 > pay $3,000 to sequence her tumor DNA > feed it to ChatGPT and AlphaFold > zero background in biology > identify mutated proteins, match them to drug targets > design a custom mRNA cancer vaccine from scratch > genomics professor is “gobsmacked” that some puppy lover did this on his own > need ethics approval to administer it > red tape takes longer than designing the vaccine > 3 months, finally approved > drive 10 hours to get rosie her first injection > tumor halves > coat gets glossy again > dog is alive and happy > professor: “if we can do this for a dog, why aren’t we rolling this out to humans?” one man with a chatbot, and $3,000 just outperformed the entire pharmaceutical discovery pipeline. we are going to cure so many diseases. I dont think people realize how good things are going to get

English
0
2
5
142
Bulliever4Ever retweetet
Srini
Srini@0xSrini·
Building a game professionally means 10 different tools for 10 different crafts, engine, rigging, animation, SFX, lighting, textures... each one its own discipline. Imagine - One interface. Multiple canvases. You describe what you want, the agent figures out which canvas it lives on.
Andrej Karpathy@karpathy

Expectation: the age of the IDE is over Reality: we’re going to need a bigger IDE (imo). It just looks very different because humans now move upwards and program at a higher level - the basic unit of interest is not one file but one agent. It’s still programming.

English
0
4
9
579

Entdecken

@BeyondPlay_xyz @base @elonmusk @BarackObama @taylorswift13 @cristiano @BillGates @NASA