Chloé de Meulenaer

3 posts

Chloé de Meulenaer banner
Chloé de Meulenaer

Chloé de Meulenaer

@CdMeul

PhD @LSEEcon | Interested in demand for redistribution, policy preferences, and all sorts of obscure films in black and white

Beigetreten Mayıs 2015
148 Folgt45 Follower
Chloé de Meulenaer retweetet
Morten N. Støstad
Morten N. Støstad@MortenStostad·
A bit about the methodology of this paper, since AI in research has been on everyone's minds. We use over 4 million API calls to GPT-4o mini to classify legislative speech excerpts in Norway and the US. Our best estimate is that classification is ~90% accurate. How do we know?
Morten N. Støstad tweet media
Morten N. Støstad@MortenStostad

NEW paper w. @LobeckMax, @CdMeul: How do people in the United States and Norway argue for redistribution? In the U.S., pro-redistributive arguments mainly appeal to fairness. In Norway, arguments about the societal consequences of inequality are central. Thread ↓

English
1
1
19
2.6K
Chloé de Meulenaer retweetet
Renaud Foucart
Renaud Foucart@RenaudFoucart·
So cool. Redistribution in the US is "because inequality is unfair," while in Norway it's "so that you can walk safely in the street and be surrounded by educated people"
Morten N. Støstad@MortenStostad

NEW paper w. @LobeckMax, @CdMeul: How do people in the United States and Norway argue for redistribution? In the U.S., pro-redistributive arguments mainly appeal to fairness. In Norway, arguments about the societal consequences of inequality are central. Thread ↓

English
1
8
20
2.5K
Chloé de Meulenaer retweetet
Morten N. Støstad
Morten N. Støstad@MortenStostad·
NEW paper w. @LobeckMax, @CdMeul: How do people in the United States and Norway argue for redistribution? In the U.S., pro-redistributive arguments mainly appeal to fairness. In Norway, arguments about the societal consequences of inequality are central. Thread ↓
Morten N. Støstad tweet media
English
5
45
138
29.5K