#WhereHasHumanityGone

With Ukraine now clearly intending to and having the capability to destroy all Russian oil infrastructure within 2,200km of the Ukrainian border, here is what it means for Russia: ​Refining wiped out: 85% of Russia's processing capacity (5.8 million barrels/day) is in the strike zone. Losing these plants means Russia cannot make its own gasoline or diesel, forcing them to import fuel just to keep their military and economy moving. ​$230 Billion revenue at risk: Russia’s entire annual oil export income is now under threat. Even the limited strikes to date have already caused over $12 billion in direct damages and lost profits. ​Export collapse: The main western ports are all within range. This halts 4 million barrels of daily exports, physically cutting off the Kremlin's primary source of international cash. ​Drilling freeze: Beyond the 2 million barrels/day of drilling directly in range, the central pumping stations for "safe" Siberian oil are also vulnerable. If these hubs are hit, Siberian oil becomes trapped in the ground with nowhere to go. ​Permanent destruction: If production is forced to stop during the winter, the oil wells and pipes will freeze and crack. This could permanently destroy 30% of Russia’s total oil supply, as these complex systems cannot be rebuilt without Western parts. The model of "Russian Federation" with Moscow at the center, would no longer exist.

Breaking: Sweden says Israel should be isolated and expelled from international institutions

‘Like’ if you don’t believe that a Thailand-based crypto-billionaire would give Farage £5 million and expect nothing at all in return. ‘Repost’ if you think the donation should have been declared in accordance with parliamentary rules.

Why is Zia Yusuf, who has never been elected as an MP or councillor, appearing on #BBCQT when Reform UK already has elected MPs and 900+ councillors? Didn't we Brexit to get away from unelected bureaucrats 😉 Surely one of these Reform UK stars - men of the people - should be on BBCQT tonight instead? Tice (£600,000) Richard Tice has been the subject of media reporting and commentary relating to the structuring of his business and property interests, with some outlets speculating that such arrangements may have had the effect of reducing tax liabilities. Figures mentioned in commentary have included estimates in the region of £600,000, although these are not established as confirmed amounts and are not the subject of any public finding of wrongdoing by HMRC. Interpretations of the reporting vary and the underlying details remain a matter of dispute. Jenrick (£37,000) Robert Jenrick has faced media scrutiny in relation to a political donation of approximately £37,000 made to his campaign, which has been discussed in the context of the donor company’s later reported associations. The issue has centred on questions of transparency and due diligence in political donations rather than any finding of illegality or improper acceptance of funds, and no allegation of knowingly receiving illicit donations has been upheld by any official body. Farage (£5,000,000) Nigel Farage has been associated in media reporting with discussion of significant political funding linked to Reform UK, including references to a donation or financial support package reported to be in the region of £5 million. This has been the subject of public debate regarding transparency and the influence of large private donations in politics. The funds relate to party financing arrangements rather than a personal payment to Farage, and commentary on the matter varies in interpretation.

Louisiana’s GOP governor just declared a STATE OF EMERGENCY to CANCEL an election. Not for a storm — but to redraw maps so he can ERASE a historically Black district. They’re not even hiding it. MAGA is rigging elections to silence YOU.

One might expect @ChrisMasonBBC to be able to find the rules on donations - it takes 3 seconds to do so: #heading-4" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm5803/cmco…

“ a personal, unconditional gift”. Of £5 million. A few months before he was elected. From the main donor to the political party he leads. Which he didn’t declare. Can you imagine the uproar if this was literally any other British political party leader? bbc.co.uk/news/articles/…

So the #Reform Leader of Basildon Council was arrested for harassment, repeated public disorder in the council offices, & filming women without permission using Meta glasses? And stalking. Ew. very #Reform. bylinetimes.com/2026/04/30/ref…

🔥🔥🔥 This is the moment E. Jean Carroll won her case against Trump. He continued to fight against having to pay her the $83 million. He even used one of the law firms he blackmailed to work pro bono! He lost and finally has to pay up. E. Jean is one of the courageous women who has stood up to this bully.

Whatever you do, don’t repost this video of Donald Trump’s vile insults. You might hurt Melania’s feelings.

I stand by my earlier statement that the Epstein files are THE biggest scandal in modern history. But without full transparency, the public is left piecing together fragments. You have me—and I’m still working as fast as I can. Keep the pressure on. Incomplete data isn’t accountability. Survivors deserve better. Release the complete Epstein files.

POLITICAL EARTHQUAKE! Congressman Dan Webster Resigns After Reading Epstein Files: 35 Republicans Have Now Abandoned Trump Trump’s legislative base is crumbling. Florida Representative Dan Webster has become the 35th Republican to resign from office after accessing the unredacted Epstein files.

Reform UK wants you to forget about Nathan Gill. Don’t let them. #ReformRussianBribes

Imagine the media reaction if Angela Rayner had accepted an undeclared £5m gift from a Bangkok-based billionaire...

Zia Yusuf is on Question Time for the 7th time tonight. BBC Question Time appearances Zarah Sultana 1 Jeremy Corbyn 1 Mick Lynch 1 - Nigel Farage 38 Very, very biased selection, even more than Fiona Bruce.

There is a name for boarding a ship and abducting innocent civilians in international waters, @BBCWorld. Its not called 'interception'. The word is piracy.

I know Brits love a bit of a bad boy, cash in hand, no questions asked, nudge, nudge, wink, wink. Farage is not that. He's connected to international money laundering, fraud, tax evasion and I believe organised crime. He's not the cheeky chappy Reformorons love, he's very dangerous.

This is categorically false. Not merely a stretch, but a straight-up lie. Congress (not Biden alone) appropriated roughly $188 billion total for Ukraine-related support from 2022–2024. NOT $350 billion. Of that, the bulk (~$110–130B in security/military categories) stayed right here in the U.S., paying American defense contractors & replenishing our own stockpiles. Actual direct financial ("cash") support to Ukraine was roughly $31–38B. Those funds were tracked by the World Bank and were audited by firms like KPMG & Deloitte. We were not writing blank checks. It's extremely frustrating to watch this President demonize an ally while downplaying Putin as the aggressor. This administration has ended new U.S. financial/military support for Ukraine (they can buy via the EU if needed). Combined with eased sanctions on Russia and the President's moral ambiguity on the war, it is just a complete betrayal that I will never, ever understand. Polls show that the vast majority of Americans are very much clear eyed about this — we support Ukraine and we sympathize with Ukraine. Our President does not reflect that majority view.

Trump: Today Is the Day You Pick a Side! Whose side are you on? Russia or NATO? Walk up to a camera. Look into the lens. Say it out loud. NATO or Russia. That is the entire question, and there is no space between those two answers where you get to hide. Thirty-one sovereign nations that have housed your troops, shared your intelligence, bought your weapons and bled alongside your soldiers for decades are now sitting with genuine, serious doubt about where your loyalty actually sits. You did that. You earned that doubt entirely on your own. So here is what we need: say that Russia is an adversary of the West. On camera. Without winking. Without a “but.” Just say it like a man who means it. Because if the answer is not clear, unambiguous and convincing, NATO should do the only rational thing: remove the United States from the alliance. As self-preservation. Keeping a potentially compromised actor inside the most sensitive military alliance on earth is a security catastrophe waiting to happen. This is a red line. And we are standing on it right now. Macron: get in front of that camera. Look straight into it. Trump. Which side? Russia or NATO. Merz: same camera, same question. Trump. Which side? Russia or NATO. Meloni, Starmer, Tusk, Sanchez, Frederiksen, Støre, Kristersson, Stubb, Mitsotakis, Montenegro, Fiala, Golob, Plenovic, Rama, Nauseda, Rinkevics, Karis, Frieden, Spajic, Mickoski. All of you. One by one. Camera on. Eyes forward. Trump. Which side? Russia or NATO. We are not in a grey zone. NATO no longer knows whether the man in the Oval Office is a partner or a liability. Intelligence services across the continent are already restricting what they share with Washington. The question hanging over every classified briefing, every military operation, every strategic plan is this: does this end up on Putin’s desk by morning? If Trump’s answer is Russia, and his behaviour suggests it is, then NATO’s most sensitive secrets are not secrets at all. They are gifts. Every troop position, every contingency plan, every back-channel communication becomes material that could be passed to Moscow by a man who is compromised sits at the top of the Western alliance. That is the logical conclusion of what we are watching in real time. NATO to Trump: Answer the F. question! Stay connected, Follow Gandalv @Microinteracti1

What's to celebrate? Harborne lives and pays his taxes in Thailand - his 'charity' involves a secret £5m (!) to Nigel Farage personally. This degree of personal bankrolling and enrichment is unprecedented in our democracy. A scandal hiding in plain sight thetimes.com/comment/column…