Re

Re has now surpassed $200M in onchain deposits. Safe and consistent yield isn't a niche. It's the future. And the future is being built on Re.

@tokenterminal The attention economy in crypto will always attract tourists. But the companies that define the next decade will be the ones that treated revenue as the only metric that mattered. Not price. Not TVL. Not followers. Revenue. Re is building this.

$187M in reUSD circulating supply in under a year. Built on revenue, not narrative.

The next era of crypto belongs to companies that generate revenue. Not narratives. Not speculation. Revenue. Here's what that looks like.

The Resilience Foundation just deployed $100M into Cover Re, its supporting insurance entity, through a regulated investment note. This is the first time blockchain-sourced capital has cleared the compliance bar to operate inside a licensed reinsurer. The capital is working now: writing policies, earning premiums, generating yield. Read the full story via @_theinsurer ⤵ theinsurer.com/program-manage…

@tokenterminal Very good MCP💪

@re 👀✍️

Half a billion dollars in TVL doesn't happen by accident. $491M TVL | $202M onchain capital | $215M premiums receivable This is what scaling global risk markets onchain actually looks like.

Yields not guaranteed. Please assess your own risk. Not financial advice.

Mint reUSD now: ⬊ app.re.xyz

Initially, we argued that the most elegant way to rebuild the risk bearing substrate of the global economy would be onchain; completely auditable and verifiable - this is starting to prove to be the case and will scale rapidly. Next, we argue that thinking computers will need this verfiable substrate to coordinate capital flows, and more broadly commerce - including provabilty of reserves and cover in insurance. This is all happening faster than anyone expected, which is exciting and unnerving. But what a gift to see these two technologies converge at the same time. theinsurer.com/ti/interview/r…

"There's really no reason why billions in capital that are purely transparent should not be happening." — @KarnSaroya, Re CEO $200M in deposits. 3 Years Profitable. Accelerating. Read the full story via @_theinsurer ⤵ theinsurer.com/ti/interview/r…

Read the full CoinDesk piece here: coindesk.com/policy/2026/03…

The Clarity Act may inadvertently do what DeFi has been arguing for years: Force idle capital into efficient, verifiable, onchain liquidity. Re isn't reacting to regulation. It's what regulation accidentally demands exists.

Why reUSD and reUSDe? Because the yield isn't tied to platform deposits or lending spreads. Yield is uncorrelated, sourced from real-world insurance risk premiums rather than DeFi loops or CEX margin books. Regulators can't ban what they were never targeting. (Optional but more pointed)

Some of it is already moving onchain. reUSD has gone from $0 to $175M+ in circulating supply in under 8 months with ~1,500 holders and accelerating.

The Clarity Act is about to ban yield on stablecoins on CEXs. Billions in idle capital need somewhere to go. Here's where it's already going 🧵

Think about what that actually means. Tens of billions sitting on CEXs earning passive yield are suddenly unproductive. That capital doesn't disappear. It relocates. The question is: where does it go?

The GENIUS/Clarity Act, in its current form, would prohibit stablecoin issuers from offering yield on balances. → That means Coinbase, Binance, and every major CEX can no longer pay you to hold USDC or USDT on their platform. This isn't speculation. @CoinDesk confirmed it in the latest draft language.