RotColl
77 posts

RotColl retweetet
RotColl retweetet

It’s not “history”, Shabana.
I’m from Telford. I was groomed and abused by different men from the age of 5.
I’ve seen countless little girls victimised by Pakistani-Muslim grooming gangs in my hometown.
IT’S STILL GOING ON.
I went on national TV to say that little girls are still being raped and tortured by Pakistani-Muslim gangs.
The next day, the police came banging on my door to threaten me into silence for speaking out.
Growing up, we knew which takeaways were dodgy, which taxi companies were controlled by the Pakistani-Muslim gangs, which estates and high streets not to walk through alone or avoid altogether.
It’s an open secret.
And your government is complicit.
It is still happening in towns and cities across the UK. Little girls are being subjected to the worst abuse imaginable, at the hands of men who know they can get away with it.
Nothing has changed.
You are still turning a blind eye despite decades of undeniable evidence.
Politicians like you are trying to sweep the scandal under the carpet, sabotaging the National Inquiry at every turn so that they can save their own skins.
And little girls are still being sacrificed at the altar of multiculturalism and traded for votes.
Decades later.
The same old story.
You may not have shoved little girls into taxis or plied them with vapes himself, but you and your entire government are just as guilty as if you had.
And I, for one, refuse to be silenced or placated by the very people who have spent decades discrediting victims and survivors like me.
Shabana Mahmood MP@ShabanaMahmood
The grooming gangs’ scandal is one of the darkest moments in our country’s history. The independent national Inquiry will now begin its crucial work to uncover how these crimes were allowed to happen and root out failure wherever it occurred. There will be no hiding place for the predatory monsters who committed these vile crimes.
English
RotColl retweetet
RotColl retweetet

@2ETEKA What a fucken idiot he’s supposed to be a conservative yet he’s watch his base get sensored
English
RotColl retweetet
RotColl retweetet

@2ETEKA they are only focused on one thing that's the economy. everything else is second rated. they threw women under the bus without concerned and told them to suck it when perverted men in skirts wanted to steal their spaces.
English
RotColl retweetet

@2ETEKA They must do opinion polling though
They know what Lab-Nat swing voters want, they know swing voters decide the election, and they are trying to keep them happy
Looks to me like 2/3 of the support they lose goes to Labour, not Act or NZF
English
RotColl retweetet

@2ETEKA Luxton has clearly stated he wants digital id for “ online “ use. He needs the bsa to have the right to control internet use so he can bring it in- otherwise he won’t have time hefore the next election.
English
RotColl retweetet

@2ETEKA He was terrible I was left thinking 1: what the hell does he get paid to actually do, 2:he’s a spluttering idiot, humming and harring very few words trying to fake intellect
English
RotColl retweetet

@2ETEKA I hope New Zealand voters can see that National have been an utter let down for those expecting a reversal of co governance or the globalist agenda or to re vitalise our economy.
English
RotColl retweetet

@2ETEKA Seeing a patton here ..
Goldsmith does Internet censorship, Collins Digital ID, Willis does CBDCs, Mitchell does surveillance & Bishop does the concentration camps/smart cities
We need to vote NZFIRST in mass to kick these globalist agenda arses out of parliament!
English
RotColl retweetet

@2ETEKA It’s stuff like this that explains why people dislike the weakness, duplicity, treason ,cowardice and elitism of Luxon more than they dislike Hipkins. The latter might be a shitweasel but he at least has some courage to stand up and tell porkies. Luxon and Goldsmith are traitors
English
RotColl retweetet

"... the parallel permanent govt - the out of control bureaucrats."
And it works because the left also controls the media and the judiciary. You either don't hear what the bureaucrats are doing (Media) and if you do, the judges (Judiciary) will give them a pass.
New Zealand isn't a parliamentary democracy anymore but, because of weak leaders like Key and Luxon, has turned into a bureaucratic juristocracy,
English
RotColl retweetet
RotColl retweetet

You have to wonder who in the @NZNationalParty actually wants a seat after the next election, Goldshit is a lick spittle, National couldn't even get the woke fuckery of the courts not posting on X sorted. @chrisluxonmp is a fucking massive disappointment as is the majority of National. Yes a couple of good ones still there but Fuck me what a disaster.
English
RotColl retweetet
RotColl retweetet

RotColl retweetet

𝗕𝗦𝗔 𝗽𝗼𝘄𝗲𝗿 𝗴𝗿𝗮𝗯: 𝗥𝗮𝗱𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝗯𝘂𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘂𝗰𝗿𝗮𝘁𝘀 𝗺𝗼𝘃𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝗽𝗼𝗹𝗶𝗰𝗲 𝗼𝗻𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗲 𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗲𝗰𝗵
ACT MP Laura McClure says today’s Broadcasting Standards Authority ruling shows a regulator scrambling to stay relevant by grabbing power it was never meant to have.
McClure is the sponsor of the Broadcasting (Disestablishment of Broadcasting Standards Authority) Amendment Bill.
“The BSA has taken a law written for rabbit-ear TV and tried to stretch it over podcasts and livestreams on the internet. That’s not credible, and Kiwis won’t buy it. This decision makes it clear the BSA isn’t just out of date, it’s out of control.
“The Authority is now claiming the internet counts as ‘broadcasting’. By that logic, anything online could be dragged into its net. That should concern anyone who values free speech.
“Kiwis already vote with their feet. If you don’t like something, you switch it off. We don’t need a panel in Wellington deciding what people are allowed to hear.
“What we’re seeing is a bureaucratic empire trying to expand because it knows its original job has disappeared.
“The BSA openly says its role is to limit speech. Extending that mindset to the internet is a huge step in the wrong direction.
“We already have laws for real harm like defamation and incitement. We do not need a taxpayer-funded taste police for online content.
“Taxpayers and media are footing the bill for a regulator that no longer serves a purpose.
“Millions in public money, plus levies on media outlets, all to fund a body now trying to regulate the internet. It’s hard to think of a clearer example of waste.
“This is exactly why I’ve lodged a bill to scrap the BSA, and today I'm writing to the Broadcasting Minister urging him to adopt it as Government legislation.
"The answer to a regulator that’s outlived its usefulness isn’t to give it more power. It’s to shut it down."
English
RotColl retweetet

For over 20 years, the BSA told Parliament it didn't have the power to regulate internet content. Parliament agreed - and declined to give it to them.
Now, after a complaint about Sean Plunket calling tikanga "mumbo jumbo," the BSA has reread a 1989 statute and decided it had the power all along.
This isn't about Sean Plunket. It's not about The Platform. It's about the principle: when Parliament says no, a handful of unelected officials in Wellington don't get to help themselves.
Hear from our Chief Executive, Jillaine Heather:
English
RotColl retweetet

The decision of the Broadcasting Standards Authority that it has jurisdiction over The Platform is breathtaking in its audacity.
It has singlehandedly decided it knows better than the regulatory framework it operates under and that it should regulate the entire internet in New Zealand.
The BSA even acknowledges in its decision that there is a regulatory gap between the Act and the modern world of communications - but has decided it can make the staggering leap to bridge that gap by ‘interpreting’ the law.
This is not interpretation – this is obviously a case of targeting an outlet, in this case The Platform, not because it believes the regulatory framework applies to it, but because it disagrees with the content of what it is communicating.
That is an egregious case of overreach and total fascist behaviour.
The BSA has crossed a line.
As far as New Zealand First is concerned, this decision commences a process that has to see the end of the BSA. It is no longer fit for purpose, and decisions like this are frankly dangerous to democratic discourse.
English




