Krista M S Norlin

This is a misleading headline. It is a soverign debt fund designed to subsidize foreign investors who will not approach projects in Canada without subsidies.

Canada Infrastructure Bank (CIB), created in 2017 Mandate: co‑invest with the private sector in large, revenue‑generating infrastructure projects. Publicly stated capital envelope: $35 billion. $14.9billion deployed, less than 60% of the headline fund is expected to be deployed more than a decade after launch. There is no project‑level or portfolio IRR disclosure. No project‑by‑project returns No portfolio IRR

Carney did NOT create a sovereign wealth fund. Carney announced a debt-fuelled corporate slush fund. The government is more than $1 trillion in debt. Carney will borrow $25 billion more. Dump it into a fund. Then gamble your money on risky corporate handouts.

This is NOT a sovereign "wealth" fund. The government is already more than $1 trillion in debt and is borrowing another $25 billion to start this fund. This is a debt-fuelled corporate slush fund.

Not only is universal basic income is part of Canada’s future. They’re building a system where they pay you a basic income — in digital currency they fully control. Your money is going digital. The government can trace, freeze, or destroy your digital tokens. It’s not a safety net. It’s a leash.

🇨🇦 𝗠𝗔𝗦𝗧𝗘𝗥 𝗧𝗛𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗗 — 𝗣𝗢𝗦𝗧 𝟭/𝟭𝟭 𝗖𝗮𝗻𝗮𝗱𝗶𝗮𝗻𝘀 — 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗶𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗺𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝘁𝗵𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗱. Eleven posts. One closed loop. Every receipt your government hopes you never connect — pulled from public filings, parliamentary records, SEC documents, UN reports, and the Auditor General. If the receipt doesn't exist, we don't post it. ──────────────────────────── 🍁 𝗪𝗲 𝗮𝗿𝗲 @𝗧𝗵𝗲𝗖𝗮𝗿𝗻𝗲𝘆𝗙𝗶𝗹𝗲𝘀 A non-partisan Canadian accountability project. No opinions. No conspiracies. Only the public record. This is not Conservatives vs Liberals. It's the documented proof of a system that's been broken for decades — no matter who's in power. ──────────────────────────── 🔍 𝗛𝗲𝗿𝗲'𝘀 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘆𝗼𝘂'𝗿𝗲 𝗮𝗯𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗱: 𝗣𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝟮 — How Canada got a Prime Minister who has never won an election. Not municipal. Not provincial. Not federal. Never. 𝗣𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝟯 — The Goldman Sachs pipeline. Same alumni, same crisis, same playbook — across five countries at once. 𝗣𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝟰 — What it cost Canadians, in dollars. Why a $300K home costs $900K. Why your savings stopped growing. 𝗣𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝟱 — Air Canada's CEO warned Ottawa about a fuel mandate. One week later, he was gone. Guess who profits from the fuel. 𝗣𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝟲 — $35.8 million in taxpayer grants to entities in the PM's wife's network. Same minister announced every one. 𝗣𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝟳 — The UN, Amnesty International, and the University of Toronto confirm it: slave labour on Canadian farms in 2026. 𝗣𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝟴 — Brookfield's footprint in four countries. Brazil. Colombia. United States. Canada. Same company. Same man at the top. 𝗣𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝟵 — 3,000 Canadian auto workers laid off in Brampton the same week the PM flew to Beijing. 𝗣𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝟭𝟬 — 13 bills in 12 months that change what you can say, watch, and spend. Most Canadians have never heard of them. 𝗣𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝟭𝟭 — What we do next. Together. ──────────────────────────── 🪄 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗽𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗻 𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿𝗻𝗲𝗮𝘁𝗵 𝗮𝗹𝗹 𝗼𝗳 𝗶𝘁: The PM appoints the Governor General. The GG rubber-stamps the PM's bills into law. The Senate is stacked by the PM. That's not democracy. That's 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘃𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗽𝗿𝗲𝘁𝗲𝗻𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗼 𝗯𝗲 𝗱𝗲𝗺𝗼𝗰𝗿𝗮𝗰𝘆 — and every party that wins power uses it the exact same way. ──────────────────────────── 🤍 𝗙𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗻𝗼𝗻-𝗽𝗮𝗿𝘁𝗶𝘀𝗮𝗻 𝗳𝗶𝘅𝗲𝘀: 1. Parliamentary confirmation of every Governor General appointment 2. Prime Ministerial powers written into law — not left to "gentlemen's agreements" 3. Real conflict-of-interest rules with mandatory cooling-off periods and full divestiture 4. Every international treaty ratified by Parliament before it becomes Canadian law 5. Provinces push back hard when Ottawa overrides Section 92/92A jurisdiction Five reforms. That's it. Not tearing the system down — just forcing it to work the way Canadians already 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗸 it does. ──────────────────────────── They spent years making us angry at each other. We're all angry now. 𝗧𝗶𝗺𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝗽𝗼𝗶𝗻𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗿 𝗮𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝘆𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗺 — 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗲𝗮𝗰𝗵 𝗼𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿. ──────────────────────────── 🔖 𝗛𝗼𝘄 𝘁𝗼 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗱: ◦ Bookmark this post first — so you can find it again ◦ Read straight through, or jump to the post that grabs you ◦ Each post links to a deeper deep-dive with every source ◦ Send it to one Canadian who hasn't seen it yet ──────────────────────────── 🤍 Like if this hits 🔁 Repost if it stops your scroll 💬 Quote with your own words ✍️ Reply — even one word boosts the thread 📲 Send to family chats, Facebook, texts — because 75% of Canadians aren't even on here Every engagement = one more Canadian finally holding the same receipts. Thread continues below 👇 ──────────────────────────── We give Canadians the receipts they haven't seen yet. Stand on Guard 🇨🇦 Share this with someone who hasn't seen it yet. #StandOnGuard #StandOnGuardCanada

Now we know why Carney kept BillC69. He can now hold the energy and resource industry hostage - if you want to get around these massive regulations you gotta pay a windfall or profit tax. And this is how he is going to fund this $25 billion sovereign wealth fund. It will get majority of Canadian support and crush the western provinces. @ABDanielleSmith just found out that she did a deal with the devil.

Breaking News ! The Liberals did all they could to suppress this!!

This is the end of an era for an institution that has been an important employer for veterans. These buildings still need security so why this decision?

During an interview on CTV News yesterday, anchor Renée Rogers asked Pierre Poilievre why he supports cutting fuel taxes if it would push inflation higher. Not only is that claim questionable—in fact, one could argue the opposite, that reducing taxes would ease inflationary pressure—but the question itself didn’t seem to come from the anchor. Renée is a solid professional. It felt planted, likely intended to destabilize the guest. I’ve experienced similar situations myself over the years. As a guest, I never dared correct the anchor out of respect. Instead, I would redirect the question and focus on what I believed mattered most to the story. This seems to be happening more often now, which is unfortunate. While Poilievre appears to have reached a point where he’s had enough of being held to account more than the government itself, Mark Carney tends to push back and correct reporters when he feels a question is either inappropriate or inconvenient. That’s the difference I see—and it points to a rather troubling state of affairs.

No comment from @MarkJCarneyLiberal over claims he personally helped balance 1998 federal budget though he was a student at Oxford at the time. blacklocks.ca/questions-on-c… #cdnpoli @liberal_party

Yup. And we still don’t have the winning conditions for pipeline to the coast. Eco extremism is still the order of the day in Ottawa. Nothing has changed.

SHOCKING Liberal Energy Minister will NOT rule out majority Beijing ownership of strategic Canadian resources. Last year, Mark Carney called Communist Beijing, Canada’s top security threat. Now he opens the door to Beijing EVs, ships out rare earths, and allows foreign control of Canada's resources. I guess the PM doesn't seem to think Beijing, that spies on Canadians, is Canada's "biggest security threat" anymore. What a bait and switch.

Mark Carney’s Dual and Parallel Roles at Brookfield and Liberal Government No leaks. No emails. No claims. Just patterns. Same sectors. Same timing. Same upside. 📅 August 26, 2020: Mark Carney joins Brookfield Asset Management as vice-chair and head of ESG and impact fund investing, later becoming chairman.[1] 📅 Throughout 2020: Carney serves as an informal advisor to Canadian PM Justin Trudeau, shaping the government’s COVID-19 economic response.[2] 📅 September 10, 2024: Carney is appointed special adviser and chair of the Liberal Party’s task force on economic growth, a role that exempts him from standard ethical disclosures for prime ministerial advisors.[3][4] 📅 January 16, 2025: Carney resigns from Brookfield to run for Liberal leadership, winning on March 9, 2025, and becoming Canada’s 24th Prime Minister on March 14, 2025.[5][6] 💡 Context: Critics, including the Conservative Party, flag potential conflicts of interest as Carney advises Liberals while chairing Brookfield, a firm seeking federal funds. Carney held $6.8M in Brookfield stock options as of December 31, 2024, fueling debate over transparency in his dual roles.[7][8] 🏢 Brookfield Partners with LanzaTech ($500M Carbon Transformation Partnership) 📅 Announced: March 31, 2023 💰 Deal Size: Up to $500M USD ⏰ Typical Deal Timeline: 3–6 months (initiated likely October 2022–January 2023). Strategic partnerships involving IP licensing, infrastructure deployment, and long-term capital commitments generally require intensive due diligence, legal structuring, and board approval before announcement. Details: The partnership aims to deploy LanzaTech’s carbon capture and transformation tech, aligning with Canada’s CCUS goals.[9] 💡 Context: 📅 March 28, 2023: Canada tables its federal budget with 30% Clean Energy Investment Tax Credit and funding for low-carbon tech.[10] 👤 Carney’s Role: Carney, as Brookfield chairman and Trudeau advisor, likely has early insight into Canada’s green policy direction. His role as UN Special Envoy for Climate Action (until January 2025) gives him a global view, potentially influencing Brookfield’s strategy.[2][11] ✅ Conclusion: The deal’s initiation before the budget suggests Brookfield may have anticipated Canada’s CCUS incentives, possibly due to Carney’s policy access. 🏢 Brookfield Buys Duke Energy Renewables (3.4 GW Wind/Solar Portfolio) 📅 Announced: June 12, 2023 💰 Deal Size: $2.8B USD ⏰ Typical Timeline: 3–6 months (initiated likely December 2022–March 2023). Large infrastructure M&A deals of this scale typically take 3–6 months to negotiate, perform due diligence, and structure, including regulatory approvals and financial arrangements. Details: Brookfield acquires Duke Energy’s commercial renewables business, adding 3.4 GW of wind and solar capacity in the U.S.[12] 💡 Context: 📅 March 28, 2023: Canada announces 30% Clean Energy Tax Credit.[10] 📅 June 2023: Carbon Contracts for Difference framework forming.[13] 👤 Carney’s Role: Carney’s dual roles and global perspective as UN Special Envoy may have informed Brookfield’s timing in North American markets.[2][11] ✅ Conclusion: The deal’s initiation before the CCfD framework was public suggests Brookfield may have acted on early policy signals, potentially informed by Carney’s dual roles. 🏢 Brookfield Invests in CarbonCapture Inc. (Direct Air Capture Tech) 📅 Announced: July 25, 2023 💰 Deal Size: Undisclosed ⏰ Typical Climate Tech Deal: 1–3 months (initiated likely April 2023–June 2023). VC/tech deal timeline: Private climate tech investments typically close within 1–3 months, depending on the round and maturity of the company, as they involve smaller capital outlays and less regulatory complexity than infrastructure deals. Details: CarbonCapture Inc. develops direct air capture tech, a priority for Canada’s CCUS strategy.[14] While this specific investment is unverified, Brookfield’s focus on DAC aligns with its $300M investment in Entropy Inc. in 2022, and CarbonCapture Inc. raised $80M in a Series A round in March 2024, indicating active investment interest in the sector. 💡 Context: 📅 June–July 2023: Ottawa signals CCUS policy support; Canada Growth Fund structuring underway.[15] 👤 Carney’s Role: Carney’s global climate expertise as UN Special Envoy likely influenced Brookfield’s focus on DAC investments.[2][11] ✅ Conclusion: The deal’s timing suggests Brookfield moved quickly in a key government priority area, possibly leveraging Carney’s policy insights. 🏢 Brookfield Begins Exiting Fossil-Heavy Infrastructure 📅 Announced: October–November 2023 (Q3 2023 earnings) 💰 Deal Size: Undisclosed ⏰ Typical Divestment Strategy Shift: 3–6 months (likely initiated in April 2023–August 2023). Strategic asset shift or wind-downs typically require 3–6 months, possibly longer for large energy infrastructure, due to internal planning, board approvals, and market positioning. Details: Brookfield signals a shift away from fossil-heavy assets, aligning with its net-zero commitments.[16] 💡 Context: 📅 September 2023: Net-zero electricity regs announced.[17] 👤Carney's Role: Carney’s policy access as Trudeau's advisor likely informed Brookfield’s strategic shift ✅ Conclusion: Brookfield’s early divestment suggests it anticipated regulatory changes, possibly informed by Carney’s policy access. 🏢 Brookfield Acquires European Solar Portfolios 📅 Announced: January 31, 2024 💰 Deal Size: Undisclosed ⏰ Typical Timeline: 2–4 months (initiated likely September 2023–November 2023). Standard acquisition timeline: Mid-sized infrastructure and renewables portfolio deals usually take 2–4 months to close, involving legal and technical due diligence but moving faster than fossil or large utility-scale deals. Details: Brookfield expands its renewable portfolio with European solar assets.[18] While this specific acquisition is unverified, Brookfield’s European renewable focus is evident from its 2023 stake in X-Elio, a German solar developer, and a $10B deal with Microsoft for US and European projects in May 2024. 💡 Context: 📅 March 2024: Pre-budget carbon tax and green subsidy signals.[19] EU Policy: EU Green Deal supports renewables.[20] 👤 Carney’s Role: Carney’s global climate role as UN Special Envoy may have guided Brookfield’s renewable strategy.[2][11] ✅ Conclusion: The deal’s initiation in Q4 2023 suggests Brookfield was well-positioned, possibly due to Carney’s global climate role. 🏢 Brookfield Closes $2B ESG Net-Zero Infrastructure Financing 📅 Announced: June 30, 2024 💰 Deal Size: $2B USD ⏰ Fundraising Timeline: 6–12 months (likely initiated June 2023–December 2023). Typical fundraise duration: Infrastructure fundraises of this size take 6–12 months from initial planning to close, involving marketing to institutional investors, legal structuring, and regulatory alignment (standard in private markets per Preqin).[21][22] While this specific fundraise is unverified, Brookfield’s ESG financing efforts are consistent with its $15B Global Transition Fund I in 2022 and a $10B climate transition fund in 2023, with climate tech funds seeing a $47B asset increase in 2024. 💡 Context: 📅 April 2024: Federal Budget expands clean tech credits & cuts fossil subsidies.[23] ✅ Conclusion: Fundraising began well before the budget, suggesting Brookfield anticipated policy support, possibly influenced by Carney’s Liberal role. 🏢 Brookfield Seeks $50B Canada-Only Asset Fund 📅 Reported: September 19, 2024 💰 Deal Size: $50B CAD (seeking $10B from taxpayers, $36B from Maple 8 pension funds) ⏰ Typical Timeline: Not specified, as this is a proposal, not a finalized deal. Such large-scale public-private investment fund proposals typically take 6–12 months to negotiate and structure, involving government approvals, pension fund agreements, and legal frameworks. Details: Brookfield seeks $10B from Canadian taxpayers for a $50B fund.[7] 💡 Context: 📅 September 10, 2024: Carney appointed Liberal economic adviser.[3] Criticism: Critics flag conflict of interest with Carney’s $6.8M stock options.[8] ✅ Conclusion: The fund proposal’s timing, days after Carney’s Liberal appointment, raises questions about potential advantages in securing federal support. ⁉️ Summary: Brookfield’s deals align closely with Canadian clean energy policies, often initiated before public announcements. Mark Carney’s dual and parallel roles as Liberal advisor and Brookfield chairman—spanning 2020 to 2025—place him at the nexus of policy and investment, potentially giving Brookfield a strategic edge. While no direct evidence of wrongdoing exists, the timeline, Carney’s $6.8M stock options, and limited transparency when questioned raise questions about transparency. Readers can draw their own conclusions on whether this overlap served the public interest or private gain. 📌 No smoking gun. 📈 But pattern recognition matters. Same themes. Same timing. Same financial upside. 🎯 Did Brookfield just have good instincts—or good information? 🪞 You decide. 📚 Footnotes 1. “Mark Carney Joins Brookfield Asset Management,” Brookfield Announcement, August 26, 2020. advisor.ca/industry-news/… 2. “Mark Carney Advises Trudeau on COVID-19 Economic Recovery,” Financial Post, October 5, 2020. financialpost.com/news/economy/t… 3. “Mark Carney to Chair the Liberal Party’s Task Force on Economic Growth,” Liberal Party of Canada, September 10, 2024. liberal.ca/mark-carney-to… 4. “Mark Carney Liberals Ethics Oversight,” National Post, September 10, 2024. nationalpost.com/news/mark-carn… 5. “Mark Carney Resigns from Brookfield to Run for Liberal Leadership,” Financial Post, January 16, 2025. financialpost.com/fp-finance/mar… 6. “Canada Prime Minister Mark Carney Sworn In,” Globe and Mail, March 14, 2025. theglobeandmail.com/politics/artic… 7. “Mark Carney Took Advantage of Loophole to Avoid Ethics Screens,” Toronto Sun, September 18, 2024. tnc.news/2024/09/19/inv… 8. “Mark Carney Conflict of Interest Concerns,” Conservative Party of Canada, March 18, 2025. conservative.ca/just-the-facts… 9. “LanzaTech and Brookfield Form a 500 Million Strategic Partnership,” Carbon Herald, March 31, 2023. carbonherald.com/lanzatech-and-… 10. “Budget 2023 – Chapter 3: A Made-in-Canada Plan,” Government of Canada, March 28, 2023. budget.canada.ca/2023/report-ra… 11. “Mark Carney Appointed UN Special Envoy for Climate Action and Finance,” UN Climate Change, December 9, 2020. un.org/sg/en/content/… 12. “Duke Energy to Sell Commercial Renewables Business in $2.8 Bln Deal,” Reuters, June 12, 2023. reuters.com/markets/deals/… 13. “Canada to Begin Financing Carbon Capture, Says It Will Ramp Up Contracts for Difference,” Reuters, November 21, 2023. reuters.com/business/energ… 14. “Occidental to Buy Carbon Engineering for $1.1 Billion in Cash,” Bloomberg, August 15, 2023. bloomberg.com/news/articles/… 15. “Building an Economy That Works for All Canadians,” Government of Canada, November 2023. canada.ca/en/department-… 16. “Sustainability Report 2023,” Brookfield, 2023. brookfield.com/responsibility… 17. “Achieving Net-Zero Grids by 2035: Changes to Canada’s Proposed Clean Electricity Regulations,” BLG, March 2024. blg.com/en/insights/20… 18. “Brookfield and Microsoft Collaborating to Deliver Over 10.5 GW of New Renewable Power,” Brookfield Renewable Partners, May 1, 2024. bep.brookfield.com/press-releases… 19. “Pre-Budget Consultations 2024,” Government of Canada, March 15, 2024. canada.ca/en/department-… 20. “European Green Deal,” European Commission, 2023. commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-p… 21. “Brookfield Raises Largest Private Fund to Support Net-Zero Transition,” Impact Investor, June 29, 2022. impact-investor.com/brookfield-rai… 22. “2024 Climate Tech Funds Report,” PitchBook, February 25, 2025. pitchbook.com/news/reports/2… 23. “Budget 2024 – Chapter 3: Building a Clean Economy,” Government of Canada, April 16, 2024. budget.canada.ca/fes-eea/2023/r…

The harder question isn't "when will the media ask?" It's: why are the same outlets that spent 5 years covering Trump's real estate holdings silent on a sitting PM's unvested stock options in a firm tied to forced labour complaints across multiple jurisdictions? That's not a blind spot. That's a choice. The receipts are public. The silence is the story. 🍁 #StandOnGuard #StandOnGuardCanada

Hey @DavidMcGuinty, let’s do a recap of a publicly listed company, get ourselves a shitload of options and shares, lobby your LPC colleagues to give the company a major lease, watch the share price go up 10x and then we can start dumping our stock. Worked for Lion Electric with their grants, and now Maritime. Happy to chat. Just have to find the next major govt project.

Yeah, Mark, let's crap on the old guys who served Canada and who try to keep people from being killed. Good idea. "Veterans Affairs ending Commissionaires' $330M federal contracting right" ca.finance.yahoo.com/news/veterans-…

News platform has the courage to challenge the industry narrative: “In short, just because Carney is smart and credentialed does not mean his decisions are above scrutiny. Smart people can and do make unsound decisions too.” canadianaffairs.news/2026/04/23/edi…

Regardless of one's partisan stripe, I think most would agree it's odd to see greater scrutiny from Canada's media of the Official Opposition than the government itself, raising questions once again of the in/direct consequences of the media subsidies.

I’m going to vigorously defend Pierre here. As his former Comms Director I can confirm our approach was equal across the board from MSM to new media to influencers. Information is broadly disseminated and journos/content creators have the freedom to interpret it as they wish.