mark batho

2.1K posts

mark batho

mark batho

@its_only_mark

Se unió Ekim 2010
438 Siguiendo251 Seguidores
mark batho retuiteado
Charles Archer
Charles Archer@that_stocks_guy·
'Just put £60k into your pension every year to avoid the tax trap above £100k - hang on, why are our most productive taxpayers taking early retirement in their 50s??!!?!?!'
English
49
39
1.6K
549.4K
mark batho retuiteado
Helena Horton
Helena Horton@horton_official·
It is extremely immoral for Rachel Reeves to effectively raise tax on people aged 21-31. I was under the impression my student loan was to pay for my education, not to fund the NHS. Why is it OK to change the terms of the loan after it was signed? theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
English
76
395
2.2K
142.1K
mark batho retuiteado
Martin Lewis
Martin Lewis@MartinSLewis·
On a Plan 2 Student loan? Why freezing the repayment threshold from 2027 to 2030 is, in my view, a breach of natural justice. A brief audio explainer
English
65
292
1.3K
273.3K
mark batho retuiteado
David Sacks
David Sacks@DavidSacks·
NYT story on Epstein & Silicon Valley has paragraphs on Elon, Peter Thiel and even photo of JCal who is a total NPC. But Reid Hoffman barely gets mentioned despite having the deepest Epstein relationship and having lied about it. This is the protection that hundreds of millions of dollars in donations to the Democrat Party and anti-Trump lawfare buys you. NYT is a scumbag publication.
Chief Nerd@TheChiefNerd

David Sacks Asks Why the New York Times is Protecting Reid Hoffman 🤔 “The number one person in the Epstein files from Silicon Valley which is Reid Hoffman … stayed at not just the island, but the townhouse and the New Mexico ranch.” “The New York Times clearly has a list of people they consider approved targets. They're all right-coded people like Elon or Peter Thiel … But the people who've donated hundreds of millions of dollars to the Democrat Party and have paid for dirty tricks against Trump, they basically are spared.”

English
952
4.7K
27.7K
2M
mark batho retuiteado
Fred de Fossard
Fred de Fossard@defossardf·
The people who put these plans together should never work again. They were told time and time again by the last government that the costs and timescales were unviable and would never gain public support. They were told repeatedly that the restoration of Parliament should focus on fire safety and boilers, not redesigning the palace and putting in new tunnelling systems for traffic, glass atriums and making every since room on every single floor disabled accessible. They were told that MPs would not vote for such plans and would not vote for Parliament to be out of action for multiple electoral cycles. Instead, the consultants continued their surveys, the lawyers billed their hours, and a whole clique of professional infrastructure failures continued to take taxpayers money to come up with these plans, and they waited for the Government to change. The Government has now changed and they are presenting the same insane plans to Parliament for approval. The Restoration and Renewal lobbying arm will spread lies about falling masonry (it's actually portcullis house which is falling down), they will lie about fires and they will demand every room be accessible despite no likelihood of that ever being required. Do not believe their numbers, do not believe their reasoning. This is a farce and it is public sector procurement at its absolute worst: vanity, delays, refusal to listen, and the taxpayer loses every time.
Politics UK@PolitlcsUK

🚨 NEW: MPs and peers must vote on two options to restore the Palace of Westminster 1: Fully move-out for 19–24 years (£11-15bn) 2: Phased works over 38–61 years, in which the Lords move out to a conference centre and MPs use their chamber for 2 years from 2041 (£19-39bn)

English
51
426
2.7K
291.5K
mark batho retuiteado
Sam Richards
Sam Richards@sjarichards·
These costs are clearly absurd. MPs should: - ask for a short report to set out which specific laws/regulations are increasing costs and by how much - pass a short bill that exempts the Palace rebuild from those rules (see Notre Dame) - pass a wider repeal/reform of those laws
Politics UK@PolitlcsUK

🚨 NEW: MPs and peers must vote on two options to restore the Palace of Westminster 1: Fully move-out for 19–24 years (£11-15bn) 2: Phased works over 38–61 years, in which the Lords move out to a conference centre and MPs use their chamber for 2 years from 2041 (£19-39bn)

English
43
175
1.7K
170.6K
mark batho retuiteado
Oli Dugmore
Oli Dugmore@OliDugmore·
Rachel Reeves admits it. She says that student debts are not loans to fund university study. They are designed as a tax for other public services, thanks to their insane interest regime. At least she’s honest!
BBC Newsnight@BBCNewsnight

“Fair and proportionate” Chancellor Rachel Reeves says the student loans system is “reasonable”, in response to Martin Lewis’ claims on #Newsnight that freezing the threshold at which graduates repay their student loans was not “a moral thing” for her to do.

English
94
452
3.3K
199.5K
mark batho retuiteado
Ben Kentish
Ben Kentish@BenKentish·
“To be able to bring down NHS waiting lists…that does involve putting money in.” Reeves is now openly admitting that she’s using low-earning young graduates as a cash cow and charging them crazy amounts of interest as a sneaky way of raising billions of pounds for the exchequer. Truly shameful.
BBC Newsnight@BBCNewsnight

“Fair and proportionate” Chancellor Rachel Reeves says the student loans system is “reasonable”, in response to Martin Lewis’ claims on #Newsnight that freezing the threshold at which graduates repay their student loans was not “a moral thing” for her to do.

English
136
481
3.6K
227.9K
mark batho retuiteado
Maven Politic
Maven Politic@MavenPolitic·
Cost of Deng Majek's illegal arrival in the UK: - Border force interception: £2,750 - Three months in a hotel: £13,500 - Murder investigation and prosecution: £600,000 - Court proceedings and legal defence: £100,000 - Cost of 29y imprisonment: £1,572,786 Total cost: £2,289,036
Maven Politic tweet media
English
1.2K
2.7K
10.9K
1M
mark batho retuiteado
Konstantin Kisin
Konstantin Kisin@KonstantinKisin·
Labour should be apologising to the British people, not smearing them.
English
508
2.8K
17.3K
540.9K
mark batho retuiteado
Basil the Great
Basil the Great@BasilTheGreat·
🚨BRITISH POLICE ARREST WRONG MAN - THIS IS INSANE Conservative holds a debate on a University campus on Deportations Leftist student ATTACKS HIM Uni staff help THE ATTACKER Police say Conservative SHOULD NOT HAVE DEBATE Police then ARREST Conservative man Absolute Disgrace
English
1.9K
9.6K
51K
1.4M
mark batho retuiteado
Oli Dugmore
Oli Dugmore@OliDugmore·
“Low tax” conservatives would scream bloody murder if I suggested raising the top rate of tax by 9% Perfectly happy to whack grads with it for 40 years, though, and scratch their chins about the birth rate
English
138
858
6.1K
276.9K
mark batho retuiteado
BBC Newsnight
BBC Newsnight@BBCNewsnight·
“I do not think this is a moral thing for you to do...” Martin Lewis shares his message to Chancellor Rachel Reeves on her decision to freeze the threshold at which graduates begin to repay their student loans. #Newsnight
English
125
655
3.6K
234.4K
mark batho retuiteado
Rupert Lowe MP
Rupert Lowe MP@RupertLowe10·
I have been forensically digging through these asylum contracts, and one stands out to me. It is absolutely staggering. Please read on. £1,593,535,200 for 'Provision of Bridging Accommodation and Travel Services’ awarded to ‘Corporate Travel Management (North) Limited’. According to the official record, they’re based in Bradford… Let’s dive into it. It’s related to the Bibby Stockholm, housing illegal migrants on a barge off the coast of Dorset. Bradford is certainly a strange place to base such an enormous contract. What is all of that money, OUR money, being spent on? All this information is taken from official documents, labelled ‘sensitive’. The illegals must be provided with a ‘varied daily menu’, taking into account all religious needs. If the illegal arrives late and missed the evening meal? They must be provided with a ‘light snack’. What about cleaning? A ‘cleaning programme’ must be delivered to the standards set by the ‘British Institute of Cleaning Science’. Routine cleaning must be provided, and their cabins are cleaned on a ‘twice weekly basis’. A ‘house-keeping laundry service’ is included, with a maximum '48-hour turn around’' Information on the local area is provided - including amenities and facilities. Illegals are assisted to make contact with a local GP surgery and dentist - they are assisted to do this. The illegals are to be taken and returned from medical appointments. A ‘programme of organised recreational activities' are provided, seven days a week. Activities available ‘morning, after, and evening each day’. Full Wi-Fi coverage is required, with a bank of mobile phones available '24/7'. Transport requests will be taken at short notice, all day every day. The transport must be ‘punctual’. ‘Adequate transport links’ must be provided to assist the illegals into the local area - and booking of transport services must be delivered for those ‘who wish to travel beyond the local area’. Warnings against ‘unconscious bias’ are made, and it’s adamant that ‘the interests of the Service Users are best served.’ It goes on and on and on. Are you happy that your tax is being spent on these services for illegals? For transport? Recreational activities? Shipping them into local communities to roam the streets? One of these illegal migrants was sentenced for sexually assaulting a teenage girl on a beach. There will be many, many, many others. 'Corporate Travel Management (North) Limited', based in Bradford, received this astronomical contract. A strange company name for such a service. What was the procurement process? How was this decided? I have put these questions to the Home Office, and I am demanding answers. The Bradford firm was told on the 24th of February 2023 that they had been awarded this £1.5 billion contract, excluding VAT (with an extension option.) Who was the Home Secretary at this time? Reform’s Suella Braverman. Who was the immigration minister at this time? Reform’s Robert Jenrick. They were the ministers, they were responsible. I want to know exactly why these outrageous contracts were signed off. It is scandalous. SO much more information on these contracts is redacted. I am going to find it... We should not be caring for these illegals, we should not be housing them, we should not be accommodating them. We should be deporting them. On an industrial scale. They are treated better than British citizens. FAR better. It makes me sick. The amount of OUR money that has been spent on these third world criminals by politicians (Reform, Conservative and Labour) is the biggest scandal of our time.
English
2.1K
12.7K
43.8K
1.8M