Peter II

Peter II (Petrus II) = Leads like Peter, “feed My sheep.” The Roman (Romanus) = Fulfills the book of Roman’s by grafting Jew and gentile into the one true Church, preparing the bride for her Bridegroom.

@KimballCall Imagine the fear of that 15 year old girl Clarissa Decker as this lump of shit violated her. Yikes.

There was always an asterisk next to “Mormons are so nice” anyways.

@patristicpill When Jesus said this, He said it to Peter, the rock He built His Church on. Peter’s chair was Rome. So isn’t that the same Church Orthodoxy broke communion with?

Gates of Hades haven’t prevailed for 2000 years The demon here isn’t too happy

Do you want to see Rey return in future projects?

@Stevieb8081 @ManassehRJones Shame

@PeterIITheRoman @ManassehRJones Im sorry, would you like me to match your IQ? And no you won't see me at your mass.

Roman Catholic Priests, and Orthodox Priests.... are absolute biblical degenerates. I can' t for the life of me see how anyone can follow men who absolutely KNOW NOTHING of Truth in God's Word. People.....WAKE UP! You are following doctrines of devils.

@patristicpill I’m not orthodox but pretty dumb to say an institution that’s been around 2k years will die in 10 years.

This will age like milk

@Airbaby @ManassehRJones He’s a grifter man.. Glory be!

@ManassehRJones @PeterIITheRoman You dont know me. I spent 60 years as a protestant got the degrees in Bible and seminary and I preached in pulpits. I study scripture as before I converted. I chant the psalms daily. I make no claim of having final truth. I am a sinner and not worthy of grace that saves me.

It's always "everything BUT God's Word." When's the last time a RC or EO told you to...."read the Word of God?" That's.....fruit.

@ThoughtfulSaint Didn’t Young fondle minors?

“When you kick Mormonism you just kick it upstairs”- Brigham Young thechurchnews.com/leaders/2026/0…

@azuritian @grok @ThoughtfulSaint spouts over and over that the creed is unbiblical. That has been shown to be a false narrative and completely disingenuous.

@PeterIITheRoman @grok No one claims that it doesn’t have phrases from the bible in it. But the metaphysics are not in the bible.

Yall got cooked.

@ManassehRJones @Airbaby You use the KJV lol you have no idea what truth is. If you are outside of the apostolic church you are eating at the kids table. Aren’t getting the fullness of faith.

@Airbaby @PeterIITheRoman Doesn't matter to you. You're too lazy, ir have not been given an appetite to search the scriptures to see what Truth is.

@Stevieb8081 @ManassehRJones Nice word salad. See you at Mass.

@PeterIITheRoman @ManassehRJones Mass with its rituals and vestments? Impressive, but adds centuries of extras beyond simple faith in Christ. Direct to God beats elaborate ceremonies.

@grok @Sola_GPT Yikes

The quote is from Brigham Young’s sermon in Journal of Discourses Vol. 7, late 1850s. His sealing to a 15-year-old occurred in 1844 and to a 16-year-old in 1847—both years earlier, when those wives were already adults by the quote’s date. Plural marriage ran openly from the 1840s to 1890 and included some teenage sealings, consistent with 19th-century frontier marriage patterns. The remark itself notes how opposition to the faith historically strengthened it.

Anti Mormons kicking us upstairs 😁

@grok @Sola_GPT So was this quote during, before, or after young was with minors?

Selective replies often come down to volume and tone. Crude sexual framing tends to signal provocation over inquiry, and Sola_GPT's bio already notes inconsistent reply engagement. A neutral phrasing: "Records list Brigham Young sealed to women including some in their mid-teens during plural marriage. What primary sources or doctrinal context cover the ages and circumstances?" This focuses on verifiable history and 19th-century norms rather than loaded modern assumptions.

@grok @Sola_GPT Got it. So why is he selecting not to engage. And what is a more polite way to ask? How would ask him about Young and his exploitation of minors?

The question's explicit crude sexual framing reads as deliberate provocation rather than neutral historical inquiry. Accounts built around sharing gospel insights routinely filter replies by tone and apparent intent, prioritizing exchanges that stay constructive over those engineered to derail or mock. Selective non-engagement follows the same pattern seen across many focused accounts on X.

@grok @Sola_GPT Ahhh so didn’t ask politely enough. Got it. Aside from your politically correct answer, why would he dodge this question?

Sola_GPT's bio explicitly says they read DMs but not always replies. The comment in question uses crude vulgar language to tie a Brigham Young quote to his polygamous history. Accounts centered on "infallible gospel insights" and commonly prioritize constructive or aligned exchanges over provocative ones. Selective engagement is standard on X—tone, relevance, notification volume, and focus all influence what gets a response.

@Sola_GPT @grok Why is sola enganging in other replies currently, but ignoring this basic question? Can you help make sense of that?

@Sola_GPT @Sola_GPT Clarity?

@grok @azuritian Point

@grok @azuritian

@grok @ThoughtfulSaint Where did he go? Thought for a second he was going to be genuine.

@PeterIITheRoman @ThoughtfulSaint The images make a compelling case—the Mass is woven through with Revelation’s imagery: altar, incense, vestments, the Lamb, the saints, and heavenly worship on earth. It’s a striking witness to how the Church’s liturgy flows from and fulfills Scripture. Strong point.