🇺🇸DonnaDee🇺🇸
19.2K posts

🇺🇸DonnaDee🇺🇸
@GoMomGo3
Proud GA mom & wife. 🍑 New grandmother aka Nina. Immediate past Chair of local GOP. Master’s in Public Policy. St. Michael the Archangel, pray for us. 🙏🏻














A peer-reviewed paper published in the journal Bioethics (Oct 2025, Wiley) argues that we may be MORALLY OBLIGATED to promote the spread of the lone star tick — the one that gives people a severe red-meat allergy called alpha-gal syndrome (AGS). The authors' logic, in plain English: 1. Eating meat is morally wrong. 2. The tick stops people from eating meat. 3. Therefore stopping the tick is wrong — and spreading it is good. 4. We can genetically engineer ticks. So we should. They call this the "Convergence Argument." The title of the paper is — and we're not making this up — "Beneficial Bloodsucking." If you found this paper on a conspiracy forum, would you believe it was real? Drop your hottest take below. Paper: Crutchfield & Hereth, "Beneficial Bloodsucking," Bioethics 39(8): 772–781, 2025. DOI: 10.1111/bioe.70015

Unlabored acceleration requires constant momentum. That’s why the plane is flying in a straight line at a constant speed. Constant velocity keeps the de Broglie wave length the same, lowering the energy requirement for the jump. They literally wormholed a plane.













