Aven & Arle Haver!!

Me

Never doing those "art vs artists" post cuz im scared I'll just look like this

"90% support it" Yeah in the same way dictators "win" elections - its a made up stat; the survey was publicly available and there was NO way to say no lol

coisa feia da desgraça meu deus os artistas da 1 season foram de fato mortos a tiros

#thishousehaspeopleinit #backrooms

Shocking, when a trans woman isn’t out, no one else knows she’s a trans woman and she doesn’t say she’s a trans woman. What a concept.

I’m actually a child online safety expert and was one of the pioneers in this space with Club Penguin and so I feel uniquely positioned to critique this. The groomer problem is real but it’s also vastly overstated. The far larger issue we saw at Penguin was suicidality or reports of sexual abuse in the home. There is no solution for lazy/bad parenting. You can implement all the ID laws you want but if parents are going to just hand kids their phones unlocked, those kids will have access to all the same things the parents have unfettered. What I found is that these draconian safety laws actually make it harder to be an honest operator of kids apps because on one hand it’s so much legal risk and so much user friction that it simply becomes uninvestible as a business. Parents will just lie to let their kids use the unfettered internet. For example, I have a friend who works in mobile gaming who has two kids, one above and one below the age limit but separated by just 2 yrs, and the two wanted to play and chat together on Roblox - which is reasonable. To do this, he just verified that his younger kid is old enough for the chat feature when he’s not. This happens all the time and will happen with these laws to. How far do we want to go with this? Scan the face of the user in real-time to make sure it’s not a kid using the device? We could do that but it feels like a massive unwanted intrusion of privacy. That’s how you know this law isn’t about kids. COPPA and GDPR-K and so forth already make it illegal to allow chat and other grooming vectors to kids. What’s really being done here is trying to eliminate online anonymity. And this is a far bigger issue that goes to core speech rights because if you cannot criticize the govt anonymously and if wrong speech is a crime then it becomes easy to identify all the detractors of the govt in power, and ban, fine or jail them for speech crimes. Starmer has already been doing this and he wants to do it at a much bigger scale. Starmer won’t even acknowledge the problem of actual grooming gangs in Britain’s neighborhoods but he’s worried about online grooming? No he’s not, and this hypocrisy gives away the game. What he wants is to kill online anonymity so he can enforce censorship of his unpopular policies. No politician should have this power.

i was mad and then i thought of this image and started giggling

This design template is destroying the ZZZ fandom

talking about yasuhiro in a fandom where they only like pale twinks

#tadc #pomni #rabbit

I disagree. Here's my take!

🐬🐆 🌺 🍡🍣 after school hangout 🎶

ขอให้เจริญรุ่งเรืองนะ🙏😭 ขอบคุณ

MY NAME IS DAVID #FNaF #sotm

2024 -> 2026 🌈

Impossível ficar feio com a paleta de cores dessas duas pqp

I did my panels so pretty! (❁´◡`❁)

Heartwarming: Hoyo discovered colors other than blue