Angela Booth

52.1K posts

Angela  Booth banner
Angela  Booth

Angela Booth

@angee

Author, keen blogger (since 1998), writing teacher.

Adelaide, South Australia 가입일 Nisan 2007
6.8K 팔로잉6.8K 팔로워
Angela Booth 리트윗함
M.A. Rothman
M.A. Rothman@MichaelARothman·
𝐍𝐎, 𝐈𝐓'𝐒 𝐍𝐎𝐓 𝐀𝐈. 𝐈𝐓'𝐒 𝐂𝐀𝐋𝐋𝐄𝐃 𝐏𝐔𝐍𝐂𝐓𝐔𝐀𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍. I see it constantly now. Someone reads a post or an article and spots an em dash — that long horizontal line — and immediately declares it was written by AI. 𝐓𝐡𝐚𝐭'𝐬 𝐚𝐧 𝐞𝐦 𝐝𝐚𝐬𝐡, 𝐝𝐞𝐟𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐭𝐞𝐥𝐲 𝐂𝐡𝐚𝐭𝐆𝐏𝐓. You know who else uses em dashes? People who actually learned how English punctuation works. I don't normally step on this particular soapbox — and I commit authorial malpractice by never trying to sell you my books — but I've authored over 30 of them. Many have been international bestsellers. Well over 𝟏,𝟎𝟎𝟎,𝟎𝟎𝟎 𝐜𝐨𝐩𝐢𝐞𝐬 in print, translated into 7+ languages, sold around the world. I am, amongst many other things, an actual author. So let me give you a quick education your grammar teachers apparently skipped. The em dash — this thing right here — is one of the most versatile punctuation marks in the English language. It's called an "em dash" because in traditional typesetting, it was the width of the capital letter M in whatever typeface you were using. It serves three primary functions. First, it sets off a parenthetical statement within a sentence — like this one — when you want more emphasis than commas provide but less formality than parentheses. Second, it signals an abrupt break in thought or a dramatic pivot. Third, it introduces an explanation or amplification of what came before it. Writers have been using it for centuries. Emily Dickinson used em dashes so obsessively her manuscripts look like they were attacked by a horizontal line. Mark Twain used them constantly in dialogue. So did F. Scott Fitzgerald. None of them had access to ChatGPT. Now for a bit of trivia most people never learn. There's also an 𝐞𝐧 𝐝𝐚𝐬𝐡 — slightly shorter, the width of the letter N. The en dash has a narrower purpose: it connects ranges. Pages 12–44. The years 1941–1945. The New York–London flight. It's the dash between two things that are connected but distinct. Most people have never heard of it, and most fonts render it just barely shorter than an em dash, which is why almost nobody notices the difference. Both have been part of formal typography since the invention of movable type in the 15th century. Gutenberg's typesetters used varying dash lengths to organize text. By the 18th century, printers had standardized the em and en dash as distinct glyphs with distinct grammatical functions. This isn't some modern AI invention — it's older than the United States. And if you use Microsoft Word, they're trivially easy to type. An en dash is Ctrl + Minus on the numeric keypad. An em dash is Ctrl + Alt + Minus on the numeric keypad. Word also auto-converts two hyphens (--) into an em dash if you have autocorrect enabled. That's why you see me use them in my books and in my posts — because I know they exist and I know the keyboard shortcut. The reason AI chatbots use em dashes frequently is because they were trained on well-written text — books, journalism, academic papers — written by people who knew the rules. The AI learned proper punctuation from proper writers. That doesn't make proper punctuation a sign of AI. It makes it a sign of 𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐜𝐲. For the record, the only things I use AI for are conjuring up a quick graphic — like the image on this post — or as a shortcut for preliminary research. Think of it as a Google accelerator. The writing? That's all me. It has been for 30+ books and countless social media posts such as this one. If you've reached the end of this post, you now know more about dashes than most people who graduated with an English degree. And the next time you see an em dash and your first instinct is to scream "AI" — maybe consider that what you're actually looking at is someone who paid attention in class. Or someone whose grammar teachers didn't fail them quite as badly as yours failed you. 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐞𝐦 𝐝𝐚𝐬𝐡 𝐢𝐬 𝟓𝟎𝟎 𝐲𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐬 𝐨𝐥𝐝. 𝐒𝐭𝐨𝐩 𝐛𝐥𝐚𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐢𝐭 𝐨𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐫𝐨𝐛𝐨𝐭𝐬.
M.A. Rothman tweet media
English
44
42
198
4.4K
Angela Booth 리트윗함
Michael Warburton
Michael Warburton@For_Film_Fans·
In 2006 a high school English teacher asked students to write to a famous author & ask for advice. KURT VONNEGUT (who left us 19yrs ago today) was the only one to respond. His reply was a doozy.
Michael Warburton tweet media
English
92
3.2K
20.4K
665.1K
Angela Booth 리트윗함
Athenaeum Book Club
Athenaeum Book Club@athenaeumbc·
Dear parents, If your child reads what everyone else reads (or nothing at all), they will think like everyone else. Give them the great books early and you give them an unfair advantage for life.
Athenaeum Book Club tweet media
English
40
211
1.8K
36.7K
Angela Booth 리트윗함
Athenaeum Book Club
Athenaeum Book Club@athenaeumbc·
C. S. Lewis… always hits the nail on the head
Athenaeum Book Club tweet media
English
15
349
1.8K
28.1K
Angela Booth 리트윗함
The Book Land
The Book Land@the_book_land·
In the 3 years of my bachelor's, all my English Literature professors refused to teach Shakespeare, claiming he was too old for the class to understand, too complex, whatever. It's unacceptable. No one's (English) literary education is anywhere near satisfactory without good knowledge of Shakespeare.
Joshua D Phillips@JoshPhillipsPhD

Not teaching Shakespeare deprives your students of their rightful inheritance. It’s good for them to read. Replacing Shakespeare w substandard material is reprehensible. “I wonder if Shakespeare is actually good for my students to read.” 🙄 edweek.org/leadership/opi…

English
56
28
334
16.5K
Angela Booth 리트윗함
Reseth
Reseth@ResethO·
Have you noticed that we've taken away the masculine urge to protect the innocent from many modern kids movies?
Reseth tweet media
English
40
437
3.4K
25.2K
Angela Booth 리트윗함
Joshua D Phillips
Joshua D Phillips@JoshPhillipsPhD·
Not teaching Shakespeare deprives your students of their rightful inheritance. It’s good for them to read. Replacing Shakespeare w substandard material is reprehensible. “I wonder if Shakespeare is actually good for my students to read.” 🙄 edweek.org/leadership/opi…
English
21
27
197
25.1K
Angela Booth 리트윗함
DaVinci
DaVinci@BiancoDavinci·
Gargoyles reading books
DaVinci tweet media
English
74
2.6K
9.6K
193.6K
Angela Booth 리트윗함
Heather Cashman
Heather Cashman@HeatherCashman·
Advice from me as a literary agent who’s also a writer: If your CP or agent or editor is telling you to remove things from your own writing (that you know you wrote) because it sounds like AI, you might politely tell them to go pound sand. AI is trained to sound like us, and it’s only getting better at it. But you are the only one with your voice. Treasure it. Keep it sacred (with all the em dashes and metaphors), no matter what anyone tells you to do.
English
60
101
588
15.4K
Angela Booth 리트윗함
Angela Booth 리트윗함
Shane Donovan
Shane Donovan@SDDonovan·
Too difficult! 😅
Shane Donovan tweet media
English
31
399
4.2K
23.1K
Angela Booth 리트윗함
Philip Ralph
Philip Ralph@PhilipRalph9·
This is what AI bros are seeking to leverage. Drew Goddard is absolutely right - the creative process is uncomfortable. It's supposed to be uncomfortable because you're a human being creating something new. Not an AI algorithm regurgitating. Learn to love it. And make art. 👍
Screenplayed@Screenplayed

‘Project Hail Mary’ screenwriter Drew Goddard shares advice every writer and filmmaker needs to hear. Watch or listen to the full episode: linktr.ee/screenplayed

English
6
252
1.2K
36.7K
Angela Booth 리트윗함
Oaks And Lions 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧
One of Britain’s most common sayings began over 700 years ago. “By hook or by crook.” Today, it means getting something done by any means necessary. But the origin dates to medieval England, likely as early as the 14th century. Ordinary people were allowed to gather firewood from common land, but only using simple tools. A hook to cut branches. A crook to pull them down. No chopping down trees. No taking more than your share. So you gathered what you could... By hook or by crook. In other words, do what you must, with what you have. What phrase have you heard but never understood? Follow @oaksandlions for more interesting posts like this. #EnglishHistory
Oaks And Lions 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧 tweet media
English
41
540
2.6K
46.4K
Angela Booth 리트윗함
Boze Herrington, Library Owl 😴🧙‍♀️
People say there’s no magic in books but the fact that you can string words together to create a series of visions in someone else’s brain is still our greatest achievement as a species.
English
103
2.9K
13.8K
136.8K
Angela Booth 리트윗함
Hachette Book Group
Hachette Book Group@HachetteUS·
A pivotal moment for publishing and the creative industries. “We’re at an absolutely pivotal moment. We need to stand up for the rights of the authors we work with and for the whole of the creative industries.” — David Shelley A timely conversation as the role of AI continues to evolve.
FORTUNE@FortuneMagazine

Who owns ideas in the AI age? @HachetteUS CEO David Shelley is taking on Big Tech, defending copyright, and making the case for why the future of human creativity is at stake. fortune.com/2026/04/08/hac…

English
0
4
12
790
Angela Booth 리트윗함
Alyssa Matesic
Alyssa Matesic@AlyssaMatesic·
Your first page is your first impression on your reader (or a literary agent). And you might be inadvertently turning them off. Here are the 7 biggest first-page mistakes I've seen in 10+ years as a book editor — and exactly how to avoid or fix them. 👇
Alyssa Matesic tweet mediaAlyssa Matesic tweet mediaAlyssa Matesic tweet mediaAlyssa Matesic tweet media
English
9
35
185
7.7K
Angela Booth 리트윗함
J.A. Konrath
J.A. Konrath@jakonrath·
Help! I am author JA Konrath. I've sold millions of books, and I self-publish on Amazon and ACX (Audible). YouTube terminated my channel for posting audio excerpts from my own audiobooks. I'll repeat that because it is so ridiculous: my videos were removed and my channel deleted and now I am banned from YouTube for posting my own original content. Can anyone help with this? Feel free to forward this post and express suggestions and/or outrage in the comments. My audio excerpts from my books Rum Runner, Dead on the Feet, Watched Too Long, and Webcam were the targets. These are my intellectual properties, I am the sole rights owner, and the voice actors were paid by me as work for hire and do not share in the royalties. I received copyright strikes from some company called Markscan, who seems to be based in India. They haven't responded to repeated emails from me. I have never heard of them, and do not know who they represent. They surely don't represent me, the writer and sole owner of the audiobook excerpts I posted. Who is Markscan? Anyone know? How can I even receive legitimate copyright strikes when I am the rights holder? My page taken was down four days after the first strike. I didn't even see the email, and by the time I did it was too late to respond. Really, YouTube? Really, Google? Can anyone help me with this? Perhaps a human being who can do a simple Google search and confirm who I am? @TeamYouTube @Google #youtube #google
English
166
531
2.5K
145K
Angela Booth 리트윗함
Kim Hornsby
Kim Hornsby@kimhornsby·
Now, more than ever people need to escape to the movies, whether at a theater or on a home screen Or inside a book Project Hail Mary is teaching us this Keep writing your scripts and books to give the world an escape 🎥📚 #writerslife #amwriting #writing
Kim Hornsby tweet media
English
4
6
41
593