SimpleJack

HEY GAMESTOP APES, THIS ONE’S FOR YOU. My model has been backtested for accuracy not just with GameStop, but with other ETFs and commodities, and the results were strong. How many times have we asked ourselves: What will finally be the stimulus that kicks #MOASS into overdrive and launches this thing to infinity? We’ve all been laser-focused on massive short selling, naked shorts, and synthetics as the main event. But what if those are just the ingredients needed for MOASS, and there’s something else we haven’t seen yet that will force it to happen? I’ve said several times it’s always been about the plumbing. The shorts are already loaded, primed, and suffocating. The real question is: what plumbing fix in this broken market is about to open the floodgates? That’s what I focused on. I tested, revised, reworked, and repeated the process for the last year or so. I tried to break it and succeeded several times when my assumptions or math were off. After repeated testing, this model accurately predicts future stock and equity trading regimes—not exact prices, but regime volatility, upward and downward movement. I had it generate some price estimates for illustrative purposes only. The model struggles if the price does not move as expected with certain market dynamics, so I adjusted them to reflect the mechanics. It does not pick exact tops or bottoms. What it does with scary precision—not just for $GME but across all equities—is predict future trading regimes with high accuracy. Full disclaimer: I did not even use price in my model to identify its ability to predict regime changes. This is an online tool for people to clearly see an illustration of the market mechanics I analyzed. You’ll instantly notice with similar volatility metrics that meme stocks (@GameStop), blue chips, ETFs, and even meme coins all trade differently, exactly like we’d expect in a real (or rigged) market. This model has called the regime change for virtually every major jump we’ve seen so far. This time the signals aren’t there yet but are getting close, and it’s worth monitoring. One or two simple acts by those in power could kick this off at any moment. Jump in, see what the strongest stimulants are, how they interact with each other, and why this entire capital stack is poised to pounce on the opportunity of a lifetime. After you play with the model, there’s a quick three-question quiz. Get it right and you unlock a secret addition to the model. It’s not baked into the live data yet, but it’s a rock-solid estimation based on the patterns. This is hypothetical fund modeling based on real arithmetic, but not able to be backtested because of the circumstances. Apes, this is a collaborative build. What’s missing? What’s wrong? Have you backtested it yourself? Drop your raw findings, critiques, theories on the Plumber, or anything else below. The more we tear it apart together, the sharper it gets. This is how we win. What do YOU think the Plumber really is? One last disclaimer: this is my first time using @Replit to build a live version of my models. I usually run them in Excel. If there are glitches, leave a comment and I’ll fix them. You can change the ticker and input manual data to backtest yourself. I have the last three weeks of GameStop preloaded and will update weekly. I could open it for others to add data, but I’m concerned about poor data (intentional or not) confusing viewers and myself. Below I’ll link some methodology I used. If you’re a true community member who wants the calculus behind it, I’m happy to share privately but I’m not posting it all for the SHFs to see. #GameStop #DRS #NakedShorts #MemeStocks #TradingRegimes #ApesTogetherStrong #FinancialPlumbing #ThePlumber @ryancohen @TheRoaringKitty @BarkingPuppy8 @powerpacks @buckthebunny @greg16676935420 Replit Model right here: …96-00-241x64t7pv285.picard.replit.dev

@OldJimZimmer I'm a Bo Nix puller but it has paid odd for me

I’m tired of pulling Jaden Daniels cards @powerpacks please fix $GME

>Polish language iPhone (“sen” = sleep) >Polish dogs 🌭 like @greg16676935420 >Polka like the band from “Season of Perpetual Hope” video by @TheRoaringKitty >They say they’re gonna ride $CHWY all the way to MOASS >Clip is from Home Alone (1990) >Trump makes a cameo in the SEQUEL 🇺🇸 >In the movie, the family must return home to pickup KEVIN, whom they forgot. >Kevin is a @BarkingPuppy8 🐶 >We’re going back for the dog. ♾️ Bonus: might have to travel with some APEs as well 🍿 🦍 $GME $AMC

The Album: Inside the @WuTangClan and @PleasrDAO Encrypted Experiment and the Future of Music Ownership There are album releases, and then there are events. What’s unfolding around Once Upon a Time in Shaolin isn’t just a drop it’s a controlled, cryptographic experience that blurs the line between art, technology, and audience participation. At the center of it all is the Wu-Tang Clan’s infamous seventh studio album, a project recorded in secrecy over six years and originally sold as a one-of-one cultural artifact. Today, that same album has been transformed into something entirely different: a tokenized, encrypted system that invites the public not to simply consume the music, but to take part in unlocking it. The album exists in digital form, but not in any way listeners would recognize. It is stored as encrypted media on IPFS, a decentralized file system, under the following reference: ipfs.io/ipfs/QmdqWf8uu… This is not a teaser, not a preview, not a marketing stunt. It is the album itself fully present, fully inaccessible. There is no playback, no streaming, no leak. Without a decryption key, the files are effectively locked away in plain sight. That missing key is the entire point. The system built around the album is governed by a smart contract deployed on the Base network: basescan.org/address/0x0615… Alongside it is a mirror NFT contract: basescan.org/address/0xf979… Together, they form a hybrid structure part fungible token, part NFT that allows thousands of participants to hold fractional positions tied to a single cultural asset. This isn’t ownership in the traditional sense. It’s something closer to coordinated access. The mechanics are deceptively simple. Each token costs roughly a dollar to mint. With every purchase, the system reduces a countdown timer by 88 seconds. The original release date of the album is set absurdly far into the future October 8, 2103 but the community can pull that moment forward, purchase by purchase. In effect, time itself becomes the commodity. The more people participate, the faster the theoretical release approaches. It’s a gamified pressure system, turning passive listeners into active participants in a shared objective: bring the album into the present. But even that doesn’t guarantee access. The contract includes a second fieldd cryption KeysURL which is currently empty. While the encrypted album is already referenced on-chain, the key required to unlock it has not been published. And crucially, there is no automatic condition in the code that forces that release. There is no clause that says the album unlocks when minting completes. No trigger tied to the countdown reaching zero. No guarantee that the reveal phase driven by external randomness will grant access. The reveal system assigns rarity scores to tokens, creating a tiered structure among holders, but it does not decrypt the music. The final step remains entirely discretionary. Control of the system traces back to a single wallet address: 0x79F84CdCe6Ca936E2D37471D5d2F8248c6317Ea8 This address received ownership of the contract at deployment. It collects mint proceeds and royalties, and it holds the authority to toggle the system on or off, initiate the reveal process, enable trading, and most importantly publish or withhold the decryption key. In other words, the blockchain provides transparency, but not autonomy. The architecture is real, the mechanics are verifiable, but the outcome is still guided by human decision-making. This duality defines the entire project. On one hand, it introduces a compelling new model for media distribution: encrypted content, fractional participation, and a community driven timeline. On the other, it retains a centralized control layer that ultimately determines when, or if, the audience ever hears the full work. $GME

@OldJimZimmer I have done some digging on the contract. Some cool stuff awaits.

@SimpleJack Yup! Haven’t done anything with these since 2024. It appears that I am in good company 🤝

@OldJimZimmer Is that how many you are holding? We are both the same type of autists. I have around a thousand. Buy them whenever I have some spare eth

I can’t believe we’re getting Once Upon a Time in Shaolin before GTA 6

PttP 🤘

Lesson 2.1 We own more than you think

Nice

If you think buying albums is the only way to speed the release. You are incorrect. 2103 is coming faster than you think.

Are you paying attention anon?

@Smoke_theArtist @ownthedoge