John Bull

@J_MoAGoGo @2LeeOrNot2Lee No one thinks cutting the rate of migration will improve the country. It will slow the speed of it getting worse. It will however get worse even with 0 net migration. We need millions of deportations before things will get better.

@2LeeOrNot2Lee It’s been falling at record rates for years. Also if it’s so important people should feel the changes. They should see that cutting migration improves the country. But it doesn’t

You lot simply can’t handle the truth. Immigration is falling precipitously and has been since Sunak. You can’t come to terms with it because doing so would mean admitting that this hasn’t made anyone’s life better and you have no real solutions to society’s problems.

@J_MoAGoGo @2LeeOrNot2Lee Not sure for Italy but politicians regularly do get punished for overseeing high migration. Countless recent examples

@2LeeOrNot2Lee But why do politicians who talk tough on migration but in fact oversee high migration like Meloni not get punished? If it’s the cumulative effects that count? It’s because of the costs associated with reducing migration

@YorkshireFests @larrylemonmaths @RyanMullarkey1 The ones you’re familiar with. Ethnics have their own. Blacks sell tickets to their events on shoobs.com and have things like Afronation

@larrylemonmaths @RyanMullarkey1 Most music festivals are at least 95% white people. Zero idea as to why, but they just are

In a phenomenon to be studied by sociologists, ‘Radio 1s Big Weekend’ is literally 100% white (British) I cannot see a single ‘new Brit’ The lie of the Yookay can be exposed in the near perfect segregation people draw when they have any amount of free choice over the matter

@RyanMullarkey1 Almost every pub beer garden is like this

@yannis_silnyy @RFisher1890 @MillennialWoes @dreki_a @Annely922 lol. "5,000 years ago there was a 300 year population replacement so you should give up your country in one generation " Despite being far richer and more capable than the people attempting to replace us on this occasion.

@RFisher1890 @MillennialWoes @dreki_a @Annely922 Source: anthropology

Josh Pieters, who is half Jewish, apparently wants us to believe there is no such thing as "ethnically English".

@yannis_silnyy @MillennialWoes @dreki_a @Annely922 Incredibly easy things can be done about it. Esp when you are an island. Esp when you have above average IQ. Esp when yo have above average state capacity/GDP. Esp when you have nukes and are on the UN Security Council.

@MillennialWoes @dreki_a @Annely922 You’re arguing a completely different point. Populations evolve over time. It happens and nothing can be done about it long term.

@yannis_silnyy @MillennialWoes @dreki_a @Annely922 When did the Japanese population last change? When did the Nigerian population last change? When did the Icelandic population last change?

@MillennialWoes @dreki_a @Annely922 It’s completely irrelevant. Populations change over time. In 1000+ years everyone will look different to some extent. That’s literally a fact.

@yannis_silnyy @MillennialWoes @Annely922 They could be if either a) one of themwiped out all the current English, or b) they interbred with the English such that a new, unique mixed group emerged. If they just co-exist separately for 1,600 years then no

@MillennialWoes @Annely922 By your own logic in 1600 years Africans and Indians etc will be English then?

@mikecosgrove @Alfred_1098 Every country not commiting suicide is based on nationalism (ethnic). If it's not, its not really a nation. The likes of Japan and China are more ethno-nationalist than a European could dream of

@Alfred_1098 Brexit wasn’t about race, culture and identity, it was about sovereignty. Ethno nationalism is mainly based on race, culture and identity.

Ethno nationalism will be the new Brexit. This sounds bat sh*t crazy but you’ll see. I tend to be right about 90%+ of these things. I bet I’m right about EN.

@infinitehorus Now more than ever it doesnt come across as daft. Partly because the team is less English than ever, and partly because remigration is more palatable than ever

This is all in reference to nationalists' online approach in the last few tournaments, which has just made nationalists look very fringe and out-of-touch or even puritan. It comes across daft. Just to reiterate, though, we do need total remigration.

World Cup is coming up soon. Please don't spend the next six weeks or so saying 'sportsball - lol' and pointing out how many England players are African. It doesn't achieve anything. Try to remember that England had several black players, including John Barnes who was from Jamaica himself (not just by parentage), back in the 80s. People are used to it. Total remigration, yes, of course, but ridiculing football achieves nothing.

@infinitehorus Not where I'm from. People think football is pride and masculinity. They don't realise how fruity it is. They should be shamed. Many have come round to this already. Even leftists are less excited but will obviously deny why

One thing you can do is remind footy fans that if Saka, Eze, Madueke and co returned to their homelands, Nigeria, Ghana and other places would have a lot of very good players and might win things, which as anti-racist meritocrats they are obliged to want. They will then say 'but we would be losing some of our best players' and then you point out that they are treating national teams as just another kind of club, and likewise with nations themselves, and some will see what you mean. You won't convert them either way though. Footy fans are mostly complete slaves to globalism. If anything they're into it because it's globalist, because they are obedience-signalers. They see it as a way to display conformity. But you can undermine their ardour for the destruction of nations and races.

@basedreecey @SamLovesEngland You should be very grateful for the morons like this. You’ll be in big trouble if more of them turn on you. But more and more are turning every day

@SamLovesEngland they will still be screaming come on england

FIFTEEN of the 26-man England squad are Africans now. The meme is becoming reality.

@G_W_L_N @WorldByWolf Imagine enjoying a sport where the organisers of it openly take the piss out of you in every way imaginable. I’d hate to be so much of a pleb that watching others play sport is the height of my enjoyment.

@WorldByWolf Imagine being unable to enjoy a sport due to race. Dude this is pathetic

It’s hard to feel any emotional connection to a team that is not even half native English. It makes international football just seem like a club tournament rather than nation against nation. I’ll still cheer on the English lads but it’s sad to see others miss out for Africans.

@tom_peters1 @WorldByWolf Nothing to do with racism. Livramento is also not English. Albeit much closer and his kid could get away with it if he changed his name and intermarried

@WorldByWolf More racism from Wolfy. 🤡 With the exception of Marc Guéhi, the England team are English.

@tom_peters1 @delbx3 @WorldByWolf Being born in the UK has nothing to do with it. We do not have ‘jus soli’ here and no old country does. British passports are given out like confetti. To actually be English you need heritage.

@delbx3 @WorldByWolf Terry Butcher being born in Singapore doesn’t change the point. Being born in the UK is one way someone is British/English. Being born abroad doesn’t automatically mean someone isn’t, especially if they grew up here, have British parentage, or are British citizens.

@tom_peters1 @delbx3 @WorldByWolf They’re Africans because their ethnic group developed in Africa. They adapted to live in Africa. They have African customs. For nearly all of them, you can find videos of them calling Africa home. They didn’t even give themselves English names in most cases

@delbx3 @WorldByWolf The problem is implying English players are “Africans” because they are black.

@duncanfraser77 @Steve_Laws_ This will happen eventually. But it will take a very long time. The third worlders replacing us are slow on the uptake and easily impressed. They’ll happily watch whatever slop is put in front them for a long while

@Steve_Laws_ I predict that, as unlikely as it seems now, the age of football will soon be over. Club teams are not made up of local lads anymore. International teams are made up of African immigrants. Fans will realise the players have no connection with them and the game is meaningless.

I would rather lose every game with an English team then win with a foreign one. You people don't get it. International football is not club football. It's about giving the best English talent a shot at the cup. Not rounding up people from all over the world and pretending they're English because they were given citizenship. It makes a mockery of the whole thing.

@ZoomerHistorian @Lion_MFC22 @RobertJenrick No we're not. We're going in the wrong direction still. Just at 100mph, instead of 200mph.

@Lion_MFC22 @RobertJenrick We’re heading in the right direction

246,000 Brits left last year. Net, 136,000 went. A city the size of Watford. Many are entrepreneurs, investors, small businesspeople. It’s the Starmer Exodus. Reform will Bring Brits Back.

@levelsio Why does it need foreigners? It doesn’t need tourists either but tourists I accept are somewhat inevitable if a place is ‘good’ and open.

No I don't think so People travel to experience other cultures, but if the place you travel to isn't that culture anymore then what are you traveling to? Globalism is good and I don't like nationalism, but I do like preserving cultures So for a neigborhood (or city) to be healthy it needs mostly locals, some foreigners, some tourists That's a healthy mix

@linmeitalks Yes, it is wrong because they want better at the expense of others and they are also refusing to help/improve their own native lands. It’s also a total lie that their countries were ruined by others. The truth is they didn’t develop anything of note in the first place

Question to white British natives only Is it wrong for migrants to want a better life for themselves when many of their own countries have been ruined/war torn or has had their natural resources extracted by the British, Europe and America? If Britain once owned or controlled their countries then left them in a an unstable/ unsafe state or continue to create wars there, why would they not come to the UK legally or illegally if allowed, when Britain has been part of ILLEGAL wars itself?