Andre Bäcker

@tinkerlog @bridgemindai I think that with Opus 4.5, anthropic raised the bar to an absurd standard. And they published good Models after but not as revolunionary as 4.5 imo. Now Codex 5.5 is just as good as 4.8 (except for Design tasks) and has been better than 4.7. so you are probably Right. Let‘s See

@AndreBcker18745 @bridgemindai Codex basicly the same but much less pricer…

GPT 5.6 is not going to compete with Claude Mythos. Claude Mythos is a completely new class of model.

@tinkerlog @bridgemindai 100% agreed here. I am excited how they are planning to operate in the future and how their pricing develops. I think that anthropic will still be on top for a little while longer, but once other firms catch up, it Starts to get interesting

@AndreBcker18745 @bridgemindai I understand , but they can’t keep raising the price . They are gonna be crashed if they do it . Other models are getting cheaper , not Just the Chinese ones . Only a Matter of time before xai or Gemini get on their same level but with a fraction of the cost .

@tinkerlog @bridgemindai I mean, anthropic is already pretty expensive, now with such a Model coming up and all the Hype, i don‘t think that‘ll be chest tbh.

@AndreBcker18745 @bridgemindai Why do you think it’s gonna be so expensive? That’s only rumors . Lets see what the actual cost will Be

@bridgemindai Unless you have 3 20x subscriptions of course haha

@bridgemindai The only Point where i See 5.6 competing is the Price. Mythos will be insanely expensive and Most people have to use their limits and usage wisely. But mythos will dominate, yeah

@matthewmillerai @bridgemindai Do you think cursor is Worth it? Where do You See the Benefit?

I spend $1,000 a month on AI and it's worth every penny. My stack: Claude Max ($600) — Claude Opus 4.8 is the best model in the world, full stop. It ships my frontend and most of my product. Codex ($200) — GPT 5.5 is great for backend work. Cursor Ultra ($200) — debug mode is fantastic, catches what I miss. Anything else I should add to the stack?

@matthewmillerai @bridgemindai Absolutely, outcome is Not particuraly better, but the task takes 3-4x the time

@bridgemindai Not a huge fan of Claude Code ultracode. It will take a task that would take 20 minutes with one agent and turn it into a 90 minute process.

Claude Code ultracode is mostly hype for Anthropic's IPO. After using it for 10 days I can confirm that the use cases where this should be used are VERY limited. I find it hallucinating all over the place. I was running over 100 Claude Opus 4.8 agents and it caused a bunch of bugs. It feels like it puts too many cooks in the kitchen. The only thing this is one shotting is usage limits. What do you think of ultracode so far?

@bridgemindai Yep, 100% After. Still think that Codex 5.5 xhigh is the way to Go for Most backend tasks - Opus 4.8 solid Model tho

@bridgemindai this is absolutely insane! @elonmusk you need to see this

Grok Voice is insane. We built a voice orchestration agent inside BridgeSpace powered entirely by Grok. Talk to it. It spawns coding agents. Assigns tasks. Prompts them with real codebase context. Follows up when they finish. No typing. No prompts. Just your voice controlling 12 agents at once. Fast, affordable, and intelligent enough to orchestrate your entire vibe coding workflow. bridgemind.ai