AntiReified

@neocounterconor I’d add, I don’t think you should dox even with the evidence. Create an opertunity for forgiveness, if it doesn’t come, leave it be. Otherwise you end up now where Destiny is, everyone is the enemy, everyone is “secretly” trying to destroy him, in a tit for tat “war”.

I’m not joining the snarkers. I don’t hate Destiny. I just think if you’re going to dox someone, you should show evidence they deserve it. Feel free to reply with evidence of Wicked Supreme and ESportsBatman deserving their dox and I’ll look at it. Peace and love, Conor

@neocounterconor You’d be better to let the bridge burn, especially when it’s happened with almost every orbiter. The impact to you is substantially greater than the impact to Destiny, and he knows it. You don’t want working relationships (unsure if you were friends) where people leverage you.

Rude.

@sleepy_devo Or because monetary policy is too focused on smoothed aggregates, hiding skewness in spending and asset allocation. You can get excess demand in housing, food, and hospitality even while the aggregate data looks “stable.” You can blame the technocrats for that one.

the ultimate answer is because you paid 17 dollars for the 4 tacos. capitalism's backbone is supply and demand - you get what you are willing to pay for, and you are willing to pay 17 dollars for 4 tacos.

@RyanCMullally @AvDebateEnjoyer @thepondering_ @WhickTv @PiscoLitty You gotta love how they pretend it’s insane when someone starts shit talking alittle bit and they suddenly, obligate people to have manners, no he’s a coward he knows the game of the debate sphere, they can stop with the moral outrage, people aren’t dumb.

@AvDebateEnjoyer was right about everything. Soon as my platform starts taking off, @thepondering_ and @WhickTv no longer are willing to risk me blowing the left out in debates. Cowards. How can you have a debate on court packing with 4 lefties? BTW @PiscoLitty - Excluding you from the above. We disagree on many things, but you are not a coward.

@Warwatcher123 @King_Solomon_LT @thepondering_ @WhickTv And now you are back to no one trusting the court as Pisco seems to believe, and hence the republican would be justified to repact the court using Pisco own argument. That shows it’s unprincipled and only pragmatic. What is the actual limiting principle?

@King_Solomon_LT @thepondering_ @WhickTv Well then the packed Supreme Court could rule the new Republican repack unconstitutional lol.

by the end, even heretic @WhickTv himself will be demanding Democrats expand both the US Supreme Court and every state supreme court

@mc_sein @Demon_thatisit @hasanthehun No that was Marx, especially when it came to figuring out what was and was not producing value. But unfortunately for you inequality comes from network effects, that’s why even the language we use has inequality (zipfs law) . So even in socialist societies you have inequality.

@Demon_thatisit @hasanthehun The source for this is that you just made it up though, right?

without class consciousness & political education, the masses in the imperial core will continue to self id w the politics of liberalism even if their desires for change go far beyond. most communists/socialists in the us went on their ideological journey because of bernie’s insurgent “democratic socialist” campaign in 2016 when he ran as a democrat against hillary clinton. the electoral system is a viable route to reach the masses w an alternative. this is what the moneyed interest in both parties fear, this is why they spend against their left flank & fight it tooth and nail. we must continue helping people awaken to the reality of this systems design that creates such inequality, it is not the migrant workers, nor trans people, or muslims or jews- but the billionaires and the parasitic forces of capital and its servants that are responsible for the deteriorating material conditions.

@_0fux_ @RyanCMullally He’s basically making a false inference, he has no evidence to make that claim. If he is going to be pedantic, be pedantic back with statistical theory.

@_0fux_ @RyanCMullally Should have made him substantiate his claim further, what evidence does he have to prove packing the court will improve confidence, then when he says a poll, it’s the confidence in the court at the moment, there is no evidence it will improve the confidence in future.

oh no 🙂

@sleepy_devo lol, the technocrats models have never worked, the dumb asses don’t realise it, which leads to long term instability for the world, this is why traditions or iterative systems always beat designed technocratic ones in complex society.

it's actually the opposite. boring, technocratic centrism is by far the most successful ideology, despite its problems. every other ideology might be right about their critiques of the status-quo but create worse societies.

@sleepy_devo It’s flipped whilst you have a full on, crash out with the left over doxxing, and behaviour? I feel like you are so theory minded you miss the concrete reality Dev. It’s always happened in bizarre online communities, it will always happen, and it’s silly to play tribalism.

we are reaching "the right eats its own" levels never before seen, in that right-wing dyed hair e-girls are now snarking on each other the political polarity has truly flipped

@MickDesl @WhickTv “No but you are forgetting he did it first, is it not ok for me to defend myself” “I though comedy was back, am I not allowed to make edgy jokes anymore” His favourite defences. He’s done it to Asmon as well, they all use drama to pull in debates.

@WhickTv Pretty horrible stuff I’m sure you wouldnt have sick individuals weaponizing dead relatives against online content creators on your show right whick?

"It's a joke" And the joke is about a content creators dead sister Notice how its aaaaalways jokes when they get called out. Its a pattern of behavior.

@Friended4Ever Those three dots are doing some heavily lifting

Elon: “do whatever Milton says” Milton: “continually grow the money supply and you will get a stable and continually growing economy”

@sleepy_devo @VDAREJamesK Nah but it would ironically destroy it though, you’d have strong metropolitan rule and an erosion of common law combined with a tit for tat game of packing the court. People would chose civil war at that point.

@VDAREJamesK none of these things are anti-democracy though.

No one actually believes in democracy.

@DDarewords @sightseer786 @Stone_tossers You’re setting the bar as “universal agreement,” but why would truth require everyone to agree? We don’t demand that in science or medicine. Why assume morality is the one domain where disagreement means there’s no truth rather than the possibility of error?

@AntReified63338 @sightseer786 @Stone_tossers As i have said before, there is no truth in regards to morality. So it can never be the correct answer. Unless you can point me to the code of conduct universal to all that all agree upon willingly.

@DDarewords @sightseer786 @Stone_tossers If there is no sense in which a moral judgment can be mistaken what is moral disagreement actually about in practice, truth or just competing internal frameworks expressing different values with no deeper standard of resolution

@AntReified63338 @sightseer786 @Stone_tossers You are asking but I have already answered. There is no "mistaken" moral judgment. One can view it that way but it does not magically make it so. There is no objective morality to refer to. No code sitting above all deciding what is right, wrong. Mistaken or correct.

@DDarewords @sightseer786 @Stone_tossers I’m not assuming you’re arguing for universal morality. I’m asking how your view accounts for normativity, what makes a moral judgment mistaken rather than just differently formed by culture and experience, since your account seems to stay on explanation rather than justification

@AntReified63338 @sightseer786 @Stone_tossers Where exactly did I assume that it's universal? For a few replies I had a feeling that you are trying to force some narrative and putting words in my mouth so please stop. If you have point, then make it. Don't make it sound like I have said it.

@DDarewords @sightseer786 @Stone_tossers Moral certainty can be misused, but that doesn’t settle whether moral judgments are just culture or better or worse responses to shared human realities like harm, cooperation and vulnerability. Why assume the issue is universals rather than how systems are shaped by power?

@AntReified63338 @sightseer786 @Stone_tossers Fanatism, extremism, fundamentalism... Pretty much the belief that ones morality is the only true one and other are nothing but a heresy. The good ol' tribal thinking of "this good = spread, this bad = eradicate. Why? Because me say so"

@DDarewords @sightseer786 @Stone_tossers If morality is just culture plus experience shaping worldview, that explains how beliefs form and differ, but not what makes one judgment better or mistaken rather than just different. What introduces error or constraint beyond how they arise?

@AntReified63338 @sightseer786 @Stone_tossers People's beliefs are first shaped by the culture. Culture of their parents. Then comes the experiences of the person and his own personal worldview which results in his own morality. Each different. Each prone to changes but still unique.

@DDarewords @sightseer786 @Stone_tossers If people’s moral beliefs are shaped by psychology,geography, material constraints and cultural narratives,then culture isn’t something separate from those factors it is just a shorthand for how those real world conditions combine to produce different value systems across groups.

@AntReified63338 @sightseer786 @Stone_tossers Because people believe their right is the only "true" right while everyone else is wrong. Add to this claims about "objective" morality from god and you have a disaster. I didn't ignore. Culture includes those and is shaped by those. Location also matter A LOT.

@DDarewords @sightseer786 @Stone_tossers If it’s only worldview collision, why does moral disagreement take the form of claims about who is wrong rather than just different preferences? And why use location as a proxy for culture while ignoring how real world constraints shape and structure those values?

@AntReified63338 @sightseer786 @Stone_tossers Why do you think there is anything making it something more that just different worldviews colliding? I said your own values and culture. Both. You can reject, critically assess it. But I doubt that a man let's say living in Japan would have cultural values of subsaharan african