Arron Saeed

Eighteen-year-old student Paul Nowak was brutally stabbed with a 21cm knife. As he lay bleeding to death, police officers arrested him after accusations that he had said something racist — instead of attempting to save his life. When Paul told officers he could not breathe and that he had been stabbed, a male voice could be heard replying: “I don’t think you have, mate.” The police appeared more concerned with words that may have been said than with helping a young man bleeding to death. When officers prioritise policing speech over responding to a life-threatening emergency, serious questions must be asked. A proper national debate on two-tier policing is long overdue.

@jameschappers @RachelReevesMP Seems Rachel understands anger from one direction but not another. When people feel a party is tone deaf they yell, it’s a natural response. When you’re constantly denigrated as ‘far right’ by people holding the megaphone at press calls you want one too. x.com/melissag0ec/st…

Bravo @RachelReevesMP and shame on the Neanderthals from Reform who celebrate women being abused on the street.

Shabana Mahmood, the UK Home Secretary responsible for our borders, migration policy and national security, has just delivered one of the most divisive and contemptuous statements imaginable. She openly declared that “the people you see holding the English flag are mostly white EDL bad people.” Let that sink in. The senior government minister charged with protecting Britain has smeared millions of ordinary English men and women – the very people who built this country, fought for it, and still wave the flag of St George with pride – as “bad people” simply for showing love for their own nation. Not criminals. Not rioters. Just everyday Brits displaying the Cross of St George at rallies, football matches or local events. This isn’t a slip of the tongue. This is a senior Labour figure in one of the most powerful jobs in government openly demonising native British identity while overseeing the very policies that are changing the country beyond recognition. At a time when grooming gangs, knife crime, small-boat invasions and parallel societies dominate the headlines, our Home Secretary’s priority is to brand flag-waving Englishmen and women as the real problem. The message couldn’t be clearer: patriotism from the indigenous population is now treated as extremism, while mass migration and cultural replacement are defended at all costs. Two-tier everything – two-tier policing, two-tier justice, and now two-tier patriotism. If you’re English and proud, you’re the threat. If you’re part of the imported communities she clearly favours, you get a free pass. This level of contempt from the very top of government is dangerous and unforgivable. Britain belongs to the British first and foremost. The English flag isn’t a symbol of hate – it’s our heritage, our identity, our right. Shabana Mahmood’s remarks expose exactly why trust in this government has collapsed and why so many are demanding real change. The British people are done being lectured and smeared in their own country. Time to put Britain and British identity first again before it’s too late. Enough is enough. 🇬🇧

Harriet Harman has just been appointed as Keir Starmer's "Adviser for Women and Girls". Her first act? To offer a seat in the House of Lords to a defeated Labour councillor, who tried to stop a grooming gang inquiry in Oldham. Have they no shame?

.@MatthewStadlen, the figures tell a partial story. Here's the rest. Net migration down 48 percent, measured from the highest artificially engineered peak in British history, driven by Conservative policy decisions in late 2023 and early 2024. Net migration at 171,000 is back to roughly where it was before the Boriswave. Non-EU net migration still stands at 350,000, roughly double pre-Brexit levels. Total arrivals in 2025 were 813,000. Nearly a million people in a single year. Small boats down 41 percent year to date. Let's examine that claim. In the first half of 2025, small boat crossings were up 48 percent on the same period in 2024 and set a new record for the first six months of any year since records began in 2018. The comparison point you are using is the record-breaking surge of 2025. Measuring a fall from your own record high isn't an achievement. It's arithmetic. And as of this afternoon, 162 migrants have crossed the Channel today alone. A former chief border inspector is warning that many hundreds more will attempt the crossing in coming days as the heatwave makes conditions ideal. The summer surge has begun. The cumulative picture tells the real story. Over 200,000 people have crossed the Channel illegally since 2018. Only around 7,500, roughly 4 percent, have been returned. Returns and deportations up 7 percent sounds impressive until you note that the removal rate remains catastrophically low. A 7 percent improvement on near zero is still near zero. The official estimate of people living in Britain without authorisation is between 700,000 and 900,000, though a study commissioned by Thames Water and obtained by the Telegraph under freedom of information suggests the true figure may exceed one million nationally, with up to 585,000 in the capital alone. That's one in thirteen of London's population. The data underpinning that study dates from 2017, before the Channel crossing surge began in earnest. The real figure today is almost certainly considerably higher. None of them appear in any of your statistics. And none of this addresses what is happening on the ground. Yesterday seven Afghan nationals appeared in Norwich charged with 40 offences including rape and human trafficking of teenage girls. On the same day seven men including an Iranian and a Syrian appeared in Bristol charged with over 40 offences against eleven teenage victims. Numbers on a spreadsheet do not capture what is being dispersed into British communities. That's the story the statistics do not tell.

@MikeTappTweets What’s the expression Mike about people in glass houses shouldn’t throw rocks. You and your party lie constantly and we see it (below).On top of that you/Labour/Starmer label anyone concerned with illegal immigration &/or censorship (ie NCHI) ‘far right’ … lies and defaming.

Don’t believe the lies from Reform. Facts 👇

I have been sickened all day by the news of three boys who lured two schoolgirls, raped them, and filmed it on their phones while they laughed and egged each other on. When they finally stood before a judge this week, they were handed “rehabilitation orders” and walked out without serving a single day behind bars. Not in prison, not in custody or a young offender institution. The judge said, “None of you need to go to prison”. What message does that send to rapists? The crime could hardly be graver, yet the punishment was no punishment at all. It’s the collapse of consequences and the rot runs right through the justice system. And this is only going to get worse because Labour are choosing to go soft on criminals: ❌ They have abolished short prison sentences. ❌ They have let tens of thousands of criminals out early. ❌ And now they want to raise the age of criminal responsibility, so that even MORE young offenders escape any consequence at all. My position is common sense👇 PRISON WORKS. ✅It punishes those who do wrong, it keeps dangerous people off our streets and away from our children. ✅It tells every victim that the law is on their side. A country that forgets this is a country where schoolgirls are raped and filmed for sport, and the boys who did it get to go home. Conservatives stand against it and our policies on sentencing and prison are the ones that will deliver a stronger country.

I’ll tell you what manners are Rach! It’s not lying on your cv, it’s not lying in your manifesto, it’s not ripping off pensioners fuel allowance. I could go on but let’s instead test you with a General Election you stinking smug hypocrite.

Seven Afghans. Forty Charges. Two Children. One Open Border. This morning, seven Afghan nationals appeared at Norwich Magistrates Court charged with 40 offences including rape, conspiracy to rape and human trafficking. The accused are Ahmadin Ahmadzai (20), Jamil Khalili (20), Fazal Auryakhel (20), Qais Kaker (20), Mohammed Farooq Shinwary (20), Sayed Wahid Davodzai (20) and Ali Ahamad (21). Six of the seven are twenty years old. The victims were girls aged in their early to mid teens. The offending ran from August 2023 to May 2025. Five of the seven arrived in Britain by small boat. One arrived concealed in a lorry in June 2020. All hold refugee status. All were dispersed into the Norwich community. None of the authorities who admitted them, housed them and granted them status appear to have considered what that community might be asked to absorb. On the same day, seven men appeared at Bristol Magistrates Court charged with more than 40 offences against eleven teenage victims. Among them: an Iranian national and a Syrian national. The offending ran from 2022 to 2025. Two cities. Two sets of charges. One day. The pattern is not a coincidence. It is a consequence. The Norwich case began in September 2023 when a young girl made a disclosure to police. By that point the offending had already been running for over a month. The investigation took nearly three years to produce charges. During those three years, Britain admitted a further 41,000 people by small boat in 2025 alone, the second highest annual total on record. The government dispersed them into communities across the country. It did not tell those communities who was arriving, where they had come from, or what, if anything, was known about them. This is the direct and documented consequence of that policy. Afghan nationals arrive unvetted from a country run by the Taliban, a regime that treats women as property, denies them education, forbids them public life and stones them for alleged moral infractions. They are granted refugee status. They are housed in British cities. They are given access to British communities. And in Norwich, in Warwickshire, in Southampton, in Epping, in Bristol, the same pattern repeats itself. Young girls, overwhelmingly white and working class, are targeted, groomed and raped by men whose culture of origin regards them as objects without rights or recourse. The national grooming gangs inquiry formally began work on 13 April 2026, six weeks ago. It will examine whether ethnicity and culture played a role in the crimes and the institutional response to them. It will run for three years. The Norwich case alone took three years to produce charges. Meanwhile, the boats keep coming. The dispersals continue. And somewhere in Britain tonight, in a city that does not yet know what it has been asked to absorb, the next case is already unfolding. The government's response to this morning's charges was to note that none of the accused had lived in asylum hotels in Norfolk. That is the full extent of its reassurance. Not that the border will close. Not that vetting will improve. Not that communities will be consulted before men from Taliban-governed Afghanistan are settled among them. Simply that the hotels were not involved. And as you read this, hundreds of migrants are crossing the Channel. The boats do not stop for court appearances. Twenty-two people died at the Manchester Arena because Britain admitted a family that claimed sanctuary and produced terrorists. Two girls in Norwich were raped by men Britain admitted as refugees. The same argument has been made after every case. The same argument has been ignored after every case. Compassion and national security are not the same thing. A government that cannot distinguish between them will keep producing the same results. "Afghan nationals arrive unvetted from a country run by the Taliban, a regime that treats women as property..."

@helloKi30596224 Warped logic. You use 1 horrific murder by a far-right extremist to smear GB viewers concerned about Labour’s ‘useless’ performance. By that logic, should all Muslims- who have traditionally voted Left/Labour - & therefore Leftists - be blamed for Islamist terrorist murders. 👇

I'm getting very sick of successful, female politicians who are serving our country, being harassed by GBeebies viewers. I remember the brutal murder.of Jo Cox by a man who was radicalised by the far right. This demonisation of MPs is what you are defending.

‘Net migration’ is a misleading measurement, because it is produced by subtracting departures from arrivals. The ONS estimates that 813,000 people immigrated to the UK last year, with 627,000 (77 per cent) of them arriving from non-EU countries. These included 138,000 Indians, 56,000 Pakistanis, 54,000 Chinese and 47,000 Nigerians. Meanwhile, 642,000 left the UK – including a quarter of million British nationals and 118,000 EU nationals. This represents substantial population change – almost 400,000 Brits and Europeans left this country last year, to be replaced by 627,000 migrants from some of the poorest countries in the world. This matters because all populations are not equal. ✍️ David Shipley Article | spectator.com/article/the-bl…

Henry Nowak — a student on a night out in Southampton — was stabbed multiple times with a 21cm knife. As he lay in a pool of his own blood, police arrested him following an accusation of “racial abuse”. He told officers that he had been stabbed and could not breathe. When Nowak repeated that he had been stabbed, it is reported that a male voice replied: “I don’t think you have, mate”. Let that sink in. A man is arrested while bleeding out because of an allegation that he may have said something racist. This is a harrowing example of the mess the police are in. They seem more concerned about the words people say than the fact that a man had just been brutally stabbed. Reform MP @RobertJenrick has called for a debate on two-tier policing, warning that it is undermining respect for the police and the rule of law in this country.

Labour: Reform is a threat to democracy. Also Labour: We’ll just defraud the public in this local election.

@tinyrowlet Try the disabled toilet. Most workplaces have them. Get your workplace to rename it ‘unisex/disabled’. Considering the demographics are small for each, you’ll probably have less queuing than if you had to use the Mens or Women’s toilets.

as a trans man i'm not allowed to use the men's toilet now because it says F on my birth certificate but i'm also not allowed to use the women's toilet because i may cause distress for looking like a man.... WHERE TF DO YOU WANT ME TO PISS????

3rd May 2026 "Do you have a problem with antisemitism in your party?" Zack Polanski: "I think we do clearly need to have a better vetting process”. 21st May 2026: Makerfield by-election candidate Chris Kennedy quits. It's a racist party that can't even vet one candidate.

@koshercockney Where was this video taken ie what British council is this?

I cannot believe the UK has come to this. Where a local council meeting is legitimately arguing whether or not to include women in their meetings.

*Random idiot throws a milkshake at Nigel Farage* Left: 😂 👏🏽 *Hecklers disrupt Farage at Reform press conferences and rallies* Left: 😂 👏🏽 *Working class guy heckles the Chancellor* Left: Omg, how misogynistic!

Surely the CPS has to go for another retrial for these two?!

Sam Harris has triggered the hell out of Hamas supporters online by simply explaining a basic fact: The Muslim terrorists who initiated a war against Israel on October 7 are facing the consequences of that war, not a genocide. They invaded Israel shouting “Allah Akbar”, raped, murdered and burned over 1,000 Jews as Islamic acts of worship, and kidnapped hundreds more into Gaza. They filmed their own atrocities with pride. They chose holy war, aka Jihad. Israel chose to fight back and destroy the enemy that attacked it. That is not genocide. That is war. The people screaming “genocide” are the same ones who celebrated October 7 and still demand more Jewish blood. They started the slaughter and now cry victim when Israel refuses to let them finish the job. Sam Harris is doing what the media and politicians refuse to do: telling the truth without apology. Do you agree with him? Yes/No?

According to Andy Burnham, if you believe that men shouldn’t be in female toilets, you’re in the minority and starting a “culture war”. This man wants to use Makerfield to become PM, he doesn’t care about the safety of women and girls. A dangerous man who is Keir Starmer 2.0.