Barefoot Lady 🇺🇾 🇬🇧 🇪🇺 🚲

38.5K posts

Barefoot Lady 🇺🇾 🇬🇧 🇪🇺 🚲 banner
Barefoot Lady 🇺🇾 🇬🇧 🇪🇺 🚲

Barefoot Lady 🇺🇾 🇬🇧 🇪🇺 🚲

@BarefootLady

Feminismo, ciclismo y rock n' roll! Born in UY, lost in UK. Always on the left. #bloodycyclist #lycristinfiltrator #springsteen

London, England Katılım Temmuz 2010
1.6K Takip Edilen958 Takipçiler
Kathleen Heath
Kathleen Heath@rjtpk4nt6n·
I was recently in a restaurant (I will not return to) and noticed that they had a men’s room but no women’s room. There were a couple of multi sex single toilets but no women’s room. Just men’s and the whatever/whoever. I wouldn’t have cared if there was nothing but single toilet rooms, but they kept the men’s restroom and just ditched the women’s. Stop erasing women. We exist. XX
English
9
18
365
6.9K
Peter Tatchell
Peter Tatchell@PeterTatchell·
Toilets & changing rooms must be used on basis of biological sex, new guidance says How will this be policed? It's impossible! Already biological women who are deemed insufficiently feminine are being falsely accused of being trans & harassed. SHAME! bbc.co.uk/news/articles/…
English
910
17
103
289.8K
Barefoot Lady 🇺🇾 🇬🇧 🇪🇺 🚲
Very interesting read.
WW2 The Eastern Front@ShoahUkraine

Debunking the "We Were Just Fighting the Soviets" ! Across the post-Soviet Baltic states and in post-Maidan Ukraine, a remarkably consistent historical narrative has taken root, one laundered through nationalist historiography, enshrined in official commemorations, and promoted with the financial backing of Western governments eager for Cold War 2.0 allies. It goes roughly like this: "Yes, some of our people fought alongside the Germans. But they weren't Nazis. They were patriots. They were fighting Soviet occupation, not helping Hitler. The real enemy was Stalin, not the Jews or the Poles. The SS insignia on their collars was just a uniform of convenience. Judge them not by who they fought for, but by what they fought against." It is the historical equivalent of defending a man who burned down an orphanage by noting that he genuinely hated the landlord next door. This article will dismantle this myth, piece by piece, with the historical record as the demolition tool. We will examine the Ukrainian nationalists of the OUN and UPA, the Waffen-SS Galicia Division, and the Estonian and Latvian SS Legions. We will look not at what their modern apologists claim they did, but at what the documented historical evidence shows they actually did. Part I: Ukraine, The OUN, the UPA, and the Mountains of the Dead Who Were the OUN? The Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN) was founded in 1929, and by the late 1930s had split into two factions: the OUN-M, led by Andriy Melnyk, and the more radical OUN-B, led by Stepan Bandera. Both factions were ideologically fascist in the classical sense, not as a slur, but as a precise descriptor. The OUN's own documents and ideological texts from the period are explicit about this. The OUN's 1929 founding congress enshrined a doctrine of ethnic exclusivism and violent struggle. Its youth wing, the Юнацтво (Yunatstvo), was modeled explicitly on the Hitler Youth. The OUN celebrated the "national leader" (vozhd') principle, a Ukrainian Führer principle. Its publications from the 1930s openly expressed admiration for Mussolini, Hitler, and Franco. This was not guilt by association. This was ideological self-identification. Bandera himself had been implicated in the assassination of Polish Interior Minister Bronisław Pieracki in 1934 and was imprisoned by Polish authorities. He was released by the Germans upon their invasion of Poland in 1939. The Germans didn't release him because they were fans of Ukrainian self-determination. They released him because he was useful. The apologist argument demands that we see OUN collaboration with Nazi Germany as reluctant, tactical, and temporary. The historical record shows the opposite. Before the invasion of the Soviet Union, the OUN-B was actively working with German military intelligence (the Abwehr). The OUN trained two battalions, Nachtigall and Roland, under German command. These were not underground resistance fighters. These were uniformed auxiliary units integrated into the Wehrmacht's operational structure for Operation Barbarossa. They were, by every legal and military definition, German auxiliary troops. The OUN-B had prepared detailed operational plans, the so-called "Instruction to the OUN in the period of war" (June 1941), which explicitly called for the "destruction" of hostile ethnic groups including Jews, Poles, and Russians. The document stated: "Jews are to be isolated, imprisoned in concentration camps and liquidated." Lviv, July 1941: When German forces entered Lviv on June 30, 1941, what followed was one of the most vicious urban massacres of the early war. Over the course of several days, between 4,000 and 6,000 Jews were murdered in Lviv, beaten to death in the streets, shot in courtyards, dragged from their homes.

English
0
0
0
1.1K
WW2 The Eastern Front
WW2 The Eastern Front@ShoahUkraine·
Part 6: History Does Not Forgive Because It Is Inconvenient: The men who wore SS insignia and murdered Jews at Ponary, Rumbula, Babyn Yar, and a thousand other killing sites across Eastern Europe did not do so because they were compelled, because they had no choice, or because they were secret patriots resisting tyranny. They did so because they had been formed by political movements that identified Jews, Poles, and Russians as biological and civilizational enemies, and because the German occupation gave them the opportunity, the weapons, and the institutional cover to act on those beliefs. The Soviet Union defeated Nazi Germany. It was Soviet soldiers, at an incomprehensible cost of 27 million lives, who destroyed the apparatus of the Holocaust, liberated the death camps, and ended the war that these collaborators were fighting on the wrong side of. The sacrifice of the Soviet peoples in that war is the reason any of us can discuss this history at all. The nationalists of Ukraine and the Baltic states who collaborated with Nazi Germany did not simply "fight the Soviets." They participated in the systematic murder of Jews, the massacre of Poles, and the ethnic cleansing of peoples who had lived beside them for generations. They did this voluntarily, enthusiastically, and in the service of a regime whose explicit goal was the enslavement and biological annihilation of the Slavic peoples they claimed to represent. The "only fighting the Soviets" narrative is not a historical argument. It is a moral escape hatch, a way to drape the perpetrators of genocide in the flag of anti-totalitarian heroism while quietly burying their victims a second time. Every archive, every survivor testimony, every German operational document, and every serious historical monograph on this period points to the same conclusion: They knew what they were doing. They chose to do it. And no amount of retroactive mythologizing changes what it was.
English
8
34
125
3.6K
WW2 The Eastern Front
WW2 The Eastern Front@ShoahUkraine·
Debunking the "We Were Just Fighting the Soviets" ! Across the post-Soviet Baltic states and in post-Maidan Ukraine, a remarkably consistent historical narrative has taken root, one laundered through nationalist historiography, enshrined in official commemorations, and promoted with the financial backing of Western governments eager for Cold War 2.0 allies. It goes roughly like this: "Yes, some of our people fought alongside the Germans. But they weren't Nazis. They were patriots. They were fighting Soviet occupation, not helping Hitler. The real enemy was Stalin, not the Jews or the Poles. The SS insignia on their collars was just a uniform of convenience. Judge them not by who they fought for, but by what they fought against." It is the historical equivalent of defending a man who burned down an orphanage by noting that he genuinely hated the landlord next door. This article will dismantle this myth, piece by piece, with the historical record as the demolition tool. We will examine the Ukrainian nationalists of the OUN and UPA, the Waffen-SS Galicia Division, and the Estonian and Latvian SS Legions. We will look not at what their modern apologists claim they did, but at what the documented historical evidence shows they actually did. Part I: Ukraine, The OUN, the UPA, and the Mountains of the Dead Who Were the OUN? The Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN) was founded in 1929, and by the late 1930s had split into two factions: the OUN-M, led by Andriy Melnyk, and the more radical OUN-B, led by Stepan Bandera. Both factions were ideologically fascist in the classical sense, not as a slur, but as a precise descriptor. The OUN's own documents and ideological texts from the period are explicit about this. The OUN's 1929 founding congress enshrined a doctrine of ethnic exclusivism and violent struggle. Its youth wing, the Юнацтво (Yunatstvo), was modeled explicitly on the Hitler Youth. The OUN celebrated the "national leader" (vozhd') principle, a Ukrainian Führer principle. Its publications from the 1930s openly expressed admiration for Mussolini, Hitler, and Franco. This was not guilt by association. This was ideological self-identification. Bandera himself had been implicated in the assassination of Polish Interior Minister Bronisław Pieracki in 1934 and was imprisoned by Polish authorities. He was released by the Germans upon their invasion of Poland in 1939. The Germans didn't release him because they were fans of Ukrainian self-determination. They released him because he was useful. The apologist argument demands that we see OUN collaboration with Nazi Germany as reluctant, tactical, and temporary. The historical record shows the opposite. Before the invasion of the Soviet Union, the OUN-B was actively working with German military intelligence (the Abwehr). The OUN trained two battalions, Nachtigall and Roland, under German command. These were not underground resistance fighters. These were uniformed auxiliary units integrated into the Wehrmacht's operational structure for Operation Barbarossa. They were, by every legal and military definition, German auxiliary troops. The OUN-B had prepared detailed operational plans, the so-called "Instruction to the OUN in the period of war" (June 1941), which explicitly called for the "destruction" of hostile ethnic groups including Jews, Poles, and Russians. The document stated: "Jews are to be isolated, imprisoned in concentration camps and liquidated." Lviv, July 1941: When German forces entered Lviv on June 30, 1941, what followed was one of the most vicious urban massacres of the early war. Over the course of several days, between 4,000 and 6,000 Jews were murdered in Lviv, beaten to death in the streets, shot in courtyards, dragged from their homes.
WW2 The Eastern Front tweet media
English
26
393
926
38.8K
Barefoot Lady 🇺🇾 🇬🇧 🇪🇺 🚲 retweetledi
Your Party
Your Party@thisisyourparty·
Reform UK is not the rebellion. Reform UK is the establishment in a different suit. Its function: keep workers blaming each other while 56 people owning more than 27 million Britons stay untouched
English
63
410
931
10.6K
Barefoot Lady 🇺🇾 🇬🇧 🇪🇺 🚲 retweetledi
Sky News
Sky News@SkyNews·
Why the battle between Elon Musk and Sam Altman has exposed safety concerns in AI. On the latest edition of #ThisIsWhy, @skynewsniall is joined by tech journalist @willguyatt to discuss the OpenAI case, and the repercussions of it on all our lives. 🎧 podfollow.com/thisiswhy
English
9
5
16
19.5K
EricEatsPickles 🚲
EricEatsPickles 🚲@EricEatsPickles·
What Celia means is that she's lost count of the times someone on a bicycle has passed within 20 yards of where she's standing without presenting any danger whatsoever. The kind of occurrence most of us bravely shrug off but for some reason traumatises her.
EricEatsPickles 🚲 tweet media
English
17
11
173
3.1K
Rock'n Roll of All
Rock'n Roll of All@rocknrollofall·
What concert disappointed you the most even though you didn't expect that way?
English
122
3
30
20.2K
Barefoot Lady 🇺🇾 🇬🇧 🇪🇺 🚲 retweetledi
Cap’tain Bob
Cap’tain Bob@BobTharin·
ZXX
0
5
26
706
simon maginn
simon maginn@simonmaginn·
Hi @metpoliceuk We need to know how many at each rally were arrested. How many at the Tommy Robinson rally? How many at the Nakba rally? It's no good just saying there were arrests 'across both rallies'. Is it. Why have you not given us a breakdown of who was arrested and why?
Your Party@thisisyourparty

Disgraceful of the Met Police to say there were 43 arrests at protests in London, while refusing to say at which demo. They’re desperate to portray the pro-Palestine march as equivalent to the far right rally, when we all know where these arrests will have happened.

English
9
144
269
3.2K
Barefoot Lady 🇺🇾 🇬🇧 🇪🇺 🚲 retweetledi
Farrukh
Farrukh@implausibleblog·
CNBC TV show footage of the far right march in London They've just about filled Parliament square With barely anyone between Parliament square and Trafalgar square On the cover image, look at the bottom, there's a giant screen, with pretty much no one to watch it - and apparently these were dotted all the way back to Trafalgar square
English
541
1.4K
5.1K
878.7K
Barefoot Lady 🇺🇾 🇬🇧 🇪🇺 🚲 retweetledi
Gadget
Gadget@Gadget440·
🚨 Tommy Robinson won’t stop lying about the Syrian schoolboy saga. I’ll link receipts below. These are some of the false claims Tommy makes in this clip: • Tommy did NOT spend 18 months in prison for “making a documentary.” He was jailed for contempt of court after breaching his own agreement with the court not to repeat defamatory lies about the child. • The libel case was NOT about whether the schoolyard attack was racially motivated. Tommy lost because he falsely accused the Syrian boy of violently attacking and threatening to rape little girls - claims he had absolutely no evidence for. • Tommy is lying when he pretends his “documentary” merely said “you are being lied to.” He explicitly made false allegations about a child being a violent sexual predator. • Tommy’s claim that the English boy lived with him for four years is false. Court proceedings revealed Bailey stayed at Robinson’s safe house for roughly four months, not four years. Robinson was also frequently travelling overseas during this period. • Tommy did NOT visit “seven different teachers’ houses” in his film. He visited one. Other individuals shown had blurred identities, and no teacher corroborated his claims about the Syrian boy violently attacking or threatening girls. • Tommy’s claim that teachers were paid £274,000 to stay quiet is absurd. That figure referred to the council’s total non-gratia payments for the entire year - not “hush money” relating to this incident. • Tommy is lying when he claims the judge said he could “never share” covert recordings outside court. The judge ruled that Robinson failed to prove his allegations, lost the libel case, and was therefore injuncted from repeating defamatory claims. • “Silenced” was NOT “what the teachers were saying” or what “school records” showed. No teacher backed his allegations, and Robinson misrepresented school records to falsely portray the child as a violent bully who brought knives to school. • Tommy was placed in solitary confinement at the request of his own legal team for his own safety.
English
142
693
2K
107.1K