Golam Kawsar

2.9K posts

Golam Kawsar banner
Golam Kawsar

Golam Kawsar

@bilash

Tweets (and retweets) are my own and do NOT represent my employer's opinions or endorsements in any way.

NY Katılım Kasım 2007
3.4K Takip Edilen653 Takipçiler
Golam Kawsar
Golam Kawsar@bilash·
Our brain evolved to survive, not find truth!
Institute of Art and Ideas@IAI_TV

What if reason isn't our pathway to truth but our obstacle to it? | bit.ly/3WDuOti From Popper's demand for falsifiability to Darwin's own doubts about the human mind, philosopher of science Samuel McKee argues that our brains were shaped by evolution not to perceive reality accurately, but to survive within it. False beliefs aren't evolutionary errors, but features optimising us for social cohesion over truth.

English
0
0
0
11
Golam Kawsar
Golam Kawsar@bilash·
I don't think The Hard Problem of Consciousness explicitly says we have a soul or that consciousness is non-physical. It simply says we do not know how the biological and physical brain gives rise the vivid lived experience of things like pain, the redness of red, the hot flush of intense love and desire, and so on. That said, I agree with Rovelli that consciousness is something we haven't just figured out yet. It's nothing mysterious, 100% generated by the biological and physical substrate in our brain and nervous system. noemamag.com/there-is-no-ha…
English
0
0
1
19
Golam Kawsar
Golam Kawsar@bilash·
[Very] Soon AI will run the show end-to-end. I think the window for maintaining and preserving human supremacy over AI is between now and until the time when AI start navigating the 4D world (3D space and 1D time). Once AI start taking control of the physical environment, and start planning for future [for themselves] while keeping perfect memory of the past, we might start to _finally_ lose the plot to them! Not sure if world models is the path to physical AI, but humans are "natural" AI made possible through billions of years of evolution that continuously kept selecting the best "breed" of the Homo Sapiens species in terms of fitness against the environment. So when AI also hits the same rubrics for survival, its only natural that both AI and humans contend for the same set of resources that nature provides us here on planet Earth. That's also the point when AI may enter into our political and economic activities. And social circles too - soon thereafter. Fun times to live!
Jack Clark@jackclarkSF

Major essay in Import AI 455, just published online.

English
0
0
2
64
Golam Kawsar
Golam Kawsar@bilash·
My most recent observation comparing the three top frontier models: ChatGPT/Codex: a lot of breadth with frequent depth into the solution space for the problem it’s solving. Claude/Claude Code: a lot of depth with frequent breadth into the solution space for the problem it’s solving. Gemini: occasional depth and occasional breadth into the solution space for the problem it’s solving. Using both ChatGPT and Claude together gives the best results. Gemini surprises sometimes with unusually incisive pointers to solution.
English
0
0
1
38
Golam Kawsar retweetledi
Cosmos Archive
Cosmos Archive@cosmosarcive·
CERN's "How Small is an Atom?" zooms from a human hair (100μm) down to quarks! Atoms are ~0.1 nm wide; millions fit across one strand. 99.99% empty space around a tiny nucleus of protons & neutrons (made of quarks). Building blocks of everything.
English
47
445
2.4K
194.5K
Golam Kawsar
Golam Kawsar@bilash·
Super interesting and informative thread on how our body is an energy flow machine through food → blood → cell → mitochondria → electron transport chain, which enables all cellular activities in the body! Living a healthy life literally then means optimizing this flow of energy.
no.mind@the_no_mind

Martin Picard published one of the most important papers in modern biology in 2025. Almost no one outside a small circle of researchers has heard of it. The Energy Resistance Principle may explain disease, aging & energy crashes — from first principles. Here’s the framework:🧵

English
0
0
1
34
Golam Kawsar
Golam Kawsar@bilash·
Hey @Airbnb your servers are sending the OTP code with extended delay (20+ minutes). Can you please check if your OTPs are being sent in a timely manner. This is happening in the NYC area. I can give more info via DM if you want. cc: @AirbnbHelp
English
0
0
0
65
Golam Kawsar
Golam Kawsar@bilash·
@skdh ChatGPT o1 pro did a pretty good job for me: chatgpt.com/share/67e60849… It even understood that I wanted a summary although my phone autocorrect wrote “annualized” instead of “summarize”!
English
0
0
3
287
Sabine Hossenfelder
Sabine Hossenfelder@skdh·
I genuinely don't understand why some people are still bullish about LLMs. I use GPT, Grok, Gemini, Mistral etc every day in the hope they'll save me time searching for information and summarizing it. They continue to fabricate links, references, and quotes, like they did from day one. I ask them to give me a source for an alleged quote, I click on the link, it returns a 404 error. I Google for the alleged quote, it doesn't exist. They reference a scientific publication, I look it up, it doesn't exist. Happens all the time. Yes, it has gotten somewhat better in the past 2 years in that with DeepSearch and chains of thought about 50-60% or so of the references exist. By my personal estimate currently GPT 4o DeepResearch is the best one. Grok in particular often doesn't include references even if asked. It can't seem to link even to tweets. It's hugely frustrating. Yes, I have tried Gemini, and actually it was even worse in that it frequently refuses to even search for a source and instead gives me instructions for how to do it myself. Stopped using it for that reason. I also use them for quick estimates for orders of magnitude and they get them wrong all the time. One thing they do save me time with is unit conversion and collecting all kinds of constants. You'd think though that this shouldn't take a 100 million++ LLM to get done. Yesterday I uploaded a paper to GPT to ask it to write a summary and it told me the paper is from 2023, when the header of the PDF clearly says it's from 2025. I don't even know what the heck is going on there, but intelligence ain't it. I sense that a lot of people now think knowledge graphs will fix the LLM-issue, but no, they will not. They cannot. Even in the case that knowledge graphs would prevent logical inconsistency 100%, there are a lot of text-constructions that are perfectly logically consistent but have zero relation to reality. Companies will keep pumping up LLMs until the day a newcomer puts forward a different type of AI model that will swiftly outperform them. On that day, it will become apparent that a lot of companies have been hugely overvalued. It will be a very bad day for the stock market.
English
1.2K
944
6.9K
1.9M
Golam Kawsar retweetledi
Sam Altman
Sam Altman@sama·
!!
Sam Altman tweet media
ZXX
2.5K
2.1K
20.3K
4M
Jacob Klug
Jacob Klug@Jacobsklug·
After generating $250K (last 2 months) I built a playbook for @lovable apps—and I’m giving it away. In just two months, we cracked the code to building apps with AI. I’ve distilled everything we learned into this single document. Comment "Build" and drop a follow. I’ll DM it to you. P.S. This will likely blow up, so give me some time to reply.
English
6.3K
193
3.2K
743.5K