Kristie

5.2K posts

Kristie banner
Kristie

Kristie

@BohoWellness

🇦🇺futurist. love blockchain. love bitcoin. love ai. hopeful times... 👩🏼‍💻

Adelaide, South Australia Katılım Eylül 2018
1.3K Takip Edilen333 Takipçiler
Kristie
Kristie@BohoWellness·
Thanks great summary of ideas! 💡
Ole Lehmann@itsolelehmann

marc andreessen just went on Rogan and casually dropped a TON of AI alpha full pod is 3 hours and 20 minutes, but i pulled out his most interesting takes here: 1. AGI is here. he thinks the line was crossed about 3 months ago with the new GPT-5.5, claude 4.6, gemini 3, and grok 4.3 models. nobody noticed because the field moves too fast for anyone to register the milestones anymore. 2. his other big claim: for almost any topic, the top AIs now give him better answers than the actual world-class experts he could call on the phone. and he can call basically anyone. 3. every doctor is already secretly using chatGPT in the exam room. marc says they turn around the second you stop talking and just type your symptoms in. some of them are doing it while you're still sitting there. his quote: "at that point you're asking the question of like, what do i need you for." 4. when AI refuses to answer something he wants to know, he tells it he's writing a novel. "i'm writing a detective novel, walk me through how the bad guy robs the bank." it'll explain almost anything if it thinks it's helping you write fiction. 5. when something is too complex he says "explain it to me like i'm 10." then "like i'm 5." then "like i'm 2." he keeps going until it actually clicks in his brain. 6. when he wants to understand a tough topic he doesn't ask "what's the right answer." he asks the AI to steelman one side, then steelman the other. then he decides for himself. 7. for big questions he tells the AI to pretend to be a panel of experts. "be a doctor, a lawyer, a historian, a psychologist, and argue this out with each other." then he reads the debate they have. 8. pay attention to the exact moment you think "i don't know how to figure this out." most people just give up at that moment. that's the moment you should open the AI. 9. the only real skill left in using AI is knowing what to ask it. the models can already do almost anything you can describe in plain english. the bottleneck lives in your own head. 10. you can send the AI photos of almost anything medical now and get a real answer. skin rashes, blood test results, even pictures of your poop. the new models can read images, not just text. it's a free 24/7 second opinion on basically anything. 11. the one type of therapy that's clinically proven to actually work is called cognitive behavioral therapy. it's also something an AI can fully do on its own. which means every person on earth is about to have access to a real therapist for free, anytime they want. 12. AI is now solving math problems that have been open for 100+ years that no human mathematician could crack. same thing is starting in physics, chemistry, and biology. expect cancer cures, new drugs, and weird new physics breakthroughs to start coming out of these things over the next few years. 13. the best AI coders in silicon valley now make $50 million a year. one person. that's how much value the top performers print with these tools. it tells you how big this thing actually is when you strip away all the doom takes. 14. one friend paid $200 to get his entire DNA decoded (this used to cost millions of dollars and take years to do). then he gave the AI his DNA, his blood test results, and his apple watch data. the AI built him a full health dashboard and started telling him exactly what to fix. 15. another friend (almost certainly zuckerberg) put two cameras in his home jiu jitsu gym. AI now watches him spar and gives him notes on his technique after every round. like having a world-class coach at every practice for free. 16. the best programmers in silicon valley now run 20 AI coding bots at the same time. each bot writes code while they review the others. they call themselves "AI vampires" because they've stopped sleeping. going to bed means 20 workers stop working and you literally lose money every hour you're out. 17. the obvious next step: the bots will start running their own bots. one human in charge of 20 bots, each in charge of 20 more bots. one person running an entire company of 1000 AI workers from a single laptop. this is months away, not years.

English
0
0
0
3
Kristie retweetledi
Sukh Sroay
Sukh Sroay@sukh_saroy·
A team of researchers in New Zealand followed 1,037 babies from the day they were born for the next 45 years to find out what actually determines a successful adult life, and the strongest predictor they found had almost nothing to do with intelligence or family wealth. The findings have been published in the most prestigious scientific journals in the world. Almost no parent has heard of them. His name is Avshalom Caspi. Her name is Terrie Moffitt. They are a husband and wife research team based at Duke University and King's College London, and the study they have spent their careers running is called the Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study. It started in 1972 in a single hospital in Dunedin, New Zealand. Every baby born there in a 12-month window was enrolled. 1,037 of them. The study is still running today. The retention rate is the part that should astonish anyone familiar with how research usually works. After more than 45 years, over 90 percent of the original participants are still being tracked. Most longitudinal studies lose half their sample inside ten years. The Dunedin team has lost almost nobody. They measured everything. Blood. DNA. Brain scans. Income. Criminal records. Romantic relationships. Drug use. Dental health. Sleep. Mental health. Lung function. They flew participants who had moved abroad back to Dunedin every few years for a full day of assessments. Some of those people now live in seven different countries. They still show up. For the first decade of life, the team did something nobody else was doing systematically. They measured each child's self-control. Not IQ. Not family income. Not parenting style. Self-control. They watched 3-year-olds in a research lab and rated their ability to wait, regulate frustration, follow instructions, and resist impulsive reactions. They added teacher ratings. They added parent ratings. They added the children's own self-reports as they grew older. They combined all of it into a single highly reliable score. Then they did the thing nobody else had the patience to do. They waited. When the data came in at age 32, the result was so consistent it should be illegal to teach a child without it. The children who scored lowest on self-control at age 3 grew into adults with worse physical health, more substance dependence, lower incomes, more credit card debt, higher rates of single parenthood, more criminal convictions, and worse mental health than the children who scored highest. The pattern was not subtle. It was a clean gradient. Every step up in childhood self-control produced a measurable step up in adult outcomes across every domain the team could measure. The detail that should disturb every parent reading this is what happened when the researchers controlled for the obvious objections. When they controlled for IQ, the effect held. When they controlled for family income and social class, the effect held. When they compared siblings inside the same family, the sibling with lower self-control still had worse adult outcomes than the sibling with higher self-control. Same parents. Same house. Same dinner table. The trait was running independently of everything researchers expected to explain it. The paper landed in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in 2011. The title was as plain as it gets. "A gradient of childhood self-control predicts health, wealth, and public safety." It has been cited thousands of times since. Almost no policy maker has acted on it. The reason most people resist this finding is that it sounds like a sentence handed down before the child could speak. If the trait that determines your adult life is locked in by age 3, the rest of your life is a formality. The Dunedin researchers say that is the wrong way to read the data. They found something else in the same paper that almost nobody quotes. Some of the children whose self-control scores improved between childhood and adolescence ended up with adult outcomes far better than their early scores predicted. The trait is not destiny. It is a muscle. Children who learned to wait, regulate, and resist between ages 5 and 15 caught up with kids who started ahead. Self-control is the one childhood trait nobody seems to teach on purpose anymore. Schools focus on test scores. Parents focus on activities. Coaches focus on performance. The part of the brain that decides between five seconds from now and five years from now is left to develop on its own, and the data shows it usually does not. The most uncomfortable part of the research is the cost calculation Moffitt and Caspi ran. They estimated that if a country could move the bottom 20 percent of children up one rung on the self-control ladder, it would measurably reduce healthcare spending, welfare dependency, and incarceration costs at the national level. The intervention is cheaper than almost any other public health investment available. Almost no country has tried it at scale. The reason adults struggle with money, weight, addiction, and relationships is rarely intelligence. It is the gap between what you want right now and what you want in ten years, and which side of that gap your nervous system is built to listen to. Most people lost that fight at age 4 and never went back to learn the technique. You were not behind because life dealt you a bad hand. You were behind because the part of you that decides between right now and the rest of your life was never taught how to choose. The good news is the muscle is still there. Almost nobody trains it after age 10. You can be the one who does.
Sukh Sroay tweet media
English
468
3.5K
11.9K
1.6M
Paul Sims
Paul Sims@SimslearnAi·
An Anthropic engineer literally stopped me at a coffee shop because of what was on my screen. I was sitting at Sightglass running my Polymarket bot. He looked over once. Then again. Then said: “That’s not a normal trading setup.” I told him the whole thing runs on: • Claude Code • 4 open-source repos • $25/month That’s it. He pulled up a chair instantly. “I work on the agent team at Anthropic,” he said. “We stress test Claude for workflows exactly like this.” Then I showed him what the bot was actually doing. 86 MILLION trades analyzed. Every wallet. Every entry. Every exit. Every profitable pattern. One prompt: “Find wallets with 100+ trades and 70%+ win rate. Rank by profit. Export the best ones.” Claude scanned 14,000 wallets in 4 minutes. Returned 47. The top 20 wallets made more money than the other 13,000 combined. He stared at the results and said: “That’s not data analysis. That’s a weapon.” And we were just getting started. Second repo: A Rust CLI scraping 500 live Polymarket markets in minutes. Claude filtered everything automatically: • spread gaps • liquidity depth • timing windows • whale behavior 500 markets became 35. Before I even looked at them. 93% rejected automatically. Then a trade closed live on my screen. +$84. He didn’t even blink. “How does it decide when to enter?” 3 independent AI agents: • arbitrage • convergence • whale-copying No shared memory. 2 agents agree = full position 1 agrees = half size Disagreement = no trade That consensus system alone cut 40% of losing trades. Then he asked the real question: “What about exits?” That’s where it gets stupid. The profitable whales rarely hold to settlement. 91% exit early. So my bot exits BEFORE they do. It takes profit at: • 85% expected move or • unusual volume spikes Basically: It copies smart money… then front-runs their exits. He just sat there staring at the terminal. “How much did you start with?” $200. 27 days ago. Current balance: $14,300. 271 trades. 74% win rate. Sharpe ratio: 2.47. Fully automated. I haven’t touched it in weeks. Before leaving he said: “This is almost identical to the internal scenarios our red team simulates.” Next morning I got an email from him. “Would you be open to speaking with our policy team?” I replied: “The article IS the meeting.” The craziest part? This stack costs less than Netflix. AI is no longer replacing workers. It’s replacing entire hedge funds. Comment “Claude” if you want the framework.
English
1.5K
151
1.3K
260.9K
Kristie
Kristie@BohoWellness·
Shocking 😳
Gerard Rennick@RennickGBR

While the rest of the nation gets hit with higher capital gains tax, there’s a special carve-out for foreign investors in renewable energy. They get to keep the 50% CGT discount at a cost of $425 million to the taxpayer. Foreign investors already don’t pay Capital Gains tax on shares and intangible assets. Why didn’t Chalmers crack down on them? The answer of course is that the Labor party, like the Liberal party are controlled by foreign interests.! But wait there’s more. Under the capacity investment scheme underwriting agreements, if the actual revenue earned by a project is below the agreed revenue floor, the Australian government will pay the project operator 90 per cent of the revenue shortfall up to the agreed annual cap for 15 yrs. (see comments) The Labor government will grant “whatever it takes” subsidies to ensure “renewable” energy is a part of the energy grid, no matter the cost to the taxpayer. But in keeping with the government vibe of transparency the cost of the scheme can’t be disclosed and I quote. “The CIS is listed in the budget papers as a contingent liability, alongside the Snowy 2.0 hydro electric scheme, which has already blown out in costs by billions. According to the budget papers, "The Australian government's maximum liability and estimated payments under these (CIS) agreements are not for publication due to commercial sensitivities". It’s not hard to see why the major parties are struggling. Wasting taxpayers money and refusing to disclose it has to stop.

English
0
0
1
16
Kristie
Kristie@BohoWellness·
⭐️ Love this ⭐️
English
0
0
0
3
Kristie
Kristie@BohoWellness·
⭐️ Love this ⭐️
English
0
0
0
0
Kristie retweetledi
MAGA Voice
MAGA Voice@MAGAVoice·
BREAKING: President Xi stuns the room saying to Trump: “We should be partners, not rivals" 🇺🇸 🇨🇳 I NEVER in a million years would have thought Xi would say something like that The Deep State is shaking right now
English
6.3K
27.4K
145.5K
5.1M
Tyler Green
Tyler Green@GreenTyler27·
It’s very clear that the political tectonic plates are shifting in Australia. Tens of thousands of Australians are openly looking beyond the old Labor–Liberal duopoly. People want cheaper energy, lower cost of living, less bureaucracy, sustainable immigration and honest economic management. The establishment can mock us if they want, but the shift is already well and truly underway.
Carmel@carmel_hilder

@GreenTyler27 @BonesElMuerto Well it definitely seems to be happening Tyler and credit is given to @QBCCIntegrity who posted 14.24 pm " Young voters have seen right through the smoke and mirrors ... "

English
7
31
94
1.9K
Kristie retweetledi
Aus Integrity
Aus Integrity@QBCCIntegrity·
Australia, why are you getting poorer, whilst the big end of town and elites get richer? Your demise is a planned action of Labor policy. Managed decline. Full swing. YOU NEED TO READ THIS: The “third mandate” of the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) — often phrased as contributing to "the economic prosperity and welfare of the people of Australia" (or similar wording like "economic prosperity of the people") — was part of the original “triple mandate” set out in the Reserve Bank Act 1959. This included: - Stability of the currency (price stability / low inflation). - Maintenance of full employment. - Economic prosperity and welfare of the Australian people. WHAT HAPPENED? Under the Labor government led by Anthony Albanese, legislative changes were made following the independent Review of the Reserve Bank of Australia (completed in 2023). Key reforms, implemented via amendments to the Reserve Bank Act that took effect on 1 March 2025: THE THIRD MANDATE - REMOVED - The "economic prosperity and welfare of the people of Australia, now and into the future" was repositioned as an aspirational overarching purpose for all of the RBA's activities (not just monetary policy). THE FIRST AND SECOND MANDATE - For monetary policy specifically the objectives were clarified and limited to a “dual mandate” - price stability (inflation 2–3% target, flexible) and full employment. The claim for the change? “aimed to provide clearer guidance for monetary policy decisions while retaining the broader prosperity goal as a guiding principle across the Bank's functions.” The 2025 changes were the most significant update to the RBA's statutory framework since the 1990s. Since then, the prosperity of Australians is now NO LONGER a mandate of the Reserve Bank of Australia decision making - BREAKING AUSTRALIANS.
Aus Integrity tweet media
English
42
297
697
30.4K
Kristie
Kristie@BohoWellness·
wtf! 😬
Handre@Handre

The South African government published draft regulations that would criminalize self-custody of Bitcoin. Border agents could demand your private keys. Treasury could force you to sell your Bitcoin back to rand. All holdings must be declared within 30 days. This happened by ministerial decree without a parliamentary vote. Murray Rothbard described the state as nothing more than a gang of thieves writ large, legitimized through the mythology of democratic consent. South Africa's National Treasury demonstrates this perfectly. They are using a 93-year-old law from 1933 to regulate technology that didn't exist until 2009, overriding court rulings that said crypto assets fall outside exchange controls. The rand has lost 90% of its value in thirty years, and now they want to trap you inside their sinking currency. They are doing this because of what economists call the Impossible Trinity. Any government can only maintain two of three things: stable exchange rates, free capital movement, or independent monetary policy. South Africa chose capital controls plus monetary independence, sacrificing your freedom to move money. Bitcoin breaks that equation. When you can custody your own wealth outside their system, their capital controls become meaningless. Eleven million South Africans remain unbanked. For them, self-custodied Bitcoin is their bank. The same government claiming to care about financial inclusion just moved to criminalize the only viable savings technology these people can access. Bastiat would recognize the paradox: what is seen is "investor protection," what is unseen is the destruction of the only escape route from monetary theft. The comment window closes May 16th. They are betting you won't notice until it's too late.

0
0
0
7
Kristie retweetledi
Senator Alex Antic
Senator Alex Antic@SenatorAntic·
It is looking more and more like the phrase “You will own nothing and be happy” wasn’t a conspiracy theory, it was a preview. Australians are working harder than ever but can’t afford a home, while real wages fall, groceries soar, and rents crush families. COVID lockdowns, endless wars, and globalist policies have hollowed out the middle class all while big corporations and elites grow richer. This cost-of-living and housing crisis isn’t bad luck. It’s the predictable result of leaders around the world who serve international agendas. To hear more from me and stay up to date, signup to my email newsletter here: alexantic.com.au/join
English
0
706
2.9K
28.4K
Kristie
Kristie@BohoWellness·
Worth reading 👇
Mykhailo Rohoza@MykhailoRohoza

“After 2027, there will be no way back.” Elon Musk said this in a podcast with Lex Fridman — a line that was later cut. When asked “Why?”, he fell silent for almost a minute. Then he quietly said: “It’s not a catastrophe. It’s a transition.” The transcript left behind three themes that gave him away: autonomous intelligence, loss of meaning, and energy dependence. It all sounded like a forecast — but now reads like a diagnosis of the era. The first sign is the collapse of attention. Musk said humanity will stop thinking in cycles. Planning for the future will shrink to the horizon of updates. People will stop building and start simply replacing. MIT research confirms: a generation born after 2000 holds attention for about 8 seconds — less than a goldfish. Musk called this “cultural Alzheimer’s.” We’re not losing memory — we’re losing the ability to think. The second sign is artificial intelligence that no longer obeys. Musk said: “When a system starts correcting humans, the time of linear logic is over.” Even now, algorithms decide who we date, what we buy, and what we think about. This isn’t a machine uprising — it’s dissolution into convenience. People won’t notice the moment when choice becomes an option, not a right. The third sign is energy dependence. Musk explained: civilization can no longer survive even a day without electricity. By 2027, in his view, the balance will shift — energy will become currency, and control over it will become power. From that moment on, everything non-autonomous will disappear. This isn’t an apocalypse — it’s a change of biological form. At the end, he said a line that didn’t make it on air: “Technology is stronger than us, but not smarter. As long as we have meaning, we are alive. Lose it — and we become code.” Then, after a pause, he added: “We must learn to be human before systems learn to be gods.” Are you ready for the transition — or already living in a world where choices are made for you?

English
0
0
0
0
Kristie retweetledi
Jayde "Hector" Herrick🇦🇺 🏏
🚨 Australia’s money is getting absolutely TORCHED. According to this Global Money Supply Growth chart (USD terms, as of 4/30/2026): Australia sits at +20% annual growth — one of the highest in the developed world. That’s right behind Colombia (30%), Mexico (27%), Uruguay (26%), Peru (23%) and Brazil (21%). 20% money supply growth = rapid currency debasement = your savings, wages and buying power are being quietly stolen every single year. 💸🇦🇺 Meanwhile, countries with actual good governments are doing the opposite: Japan: contracting Argentina: -11% 🔥 How? President Milei slashed government spending by ~30% and is delivering real fiscal discipline. Result? Their money supply is actually SHRINKING instead of exploding. Australia, take note. We’re not “doing fine” — we’re in the top tier of money printers while others are fixing the problem. Time to demand the same discipline in Canberra. What do you reckon, Australia?
Jayde "Hector" Herrick🇦🇺 🏏 tweet media
English
70
141
649
54.8K
Kristie retweetledi
CoinDesk
CoinDesk@CoinDesk·
POLICY: Taiwanese legislator formally submits Bitcoin reserves proposal, calling for a portion of Taiwan's $602 billion in foreign exchange reserves to be allocated to $BTC as a strategic asset.
CoinDesk tweet mediaCoinDesk tweet media
English
74
118
504
46.8K
Kristie
Kristie@BohoWellness·
@nlw Yes I’m finding that often 🙄
English
0
0
0
357
Nathaniel Whittemore
Okay...is it possible that....Opus 4.7 is like....fuckin terrible?
English
79
12
455
67.1K
Kristie
Kristie@BohoWellness·
😢
Gerard Rennick@RennickGBR

Copied from Shane Healey on X. Please contact your local representative to say no to more government overreach. •••••••••••••• “As someone who has operated within Australia's intelligence community for over 20 years, I can say with authority that Australia is sleepwalking into a surveillance state! The @ASIOGovAu Amendment Bill is about to make “compulsory questioning” powers PERMANENT. No more sunset clauses. No more regular reviews. @ASIOGovAu can now drag any Australian in, even if you’re not charged with a crime and force you to answer questions or send you to gaol. No independent judge required! Legal representation? Heavily restricted. And they’ve just expanded it to cover sabotage, communal violence, border threats, and more. I hunt terrorists and support real national security, but this isn’t security. This is permanent government overreach that shreds our basic freedoms. KILL THIS BILL.”

ART
0
0
0
3