Buckner Stokely

874 posts

Buckner Stokely

Buckner Stokely

@Buckner423

Katılım Temmuz 2023
354 Takip Edilen71 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Buckner Stokely
Buckner Stokely@Buckner423·
Speaking of time travel @RealCandaceO Back in the past so so long ago when you actually tried to fight for America & American values back before the Alien took over you Now ur just weird Joe Rogan & Candace Owens ARGUE Over Climate Change youtu.be/9lD29jqH078?si… via @YouTube
YouTube video
YouTube
English
0
0
2
137
Buckner Stokely retweetledi
Lauren Maxwell
Lauren Maxwell@maxwabam·
Candace and her husband offered to buy TPUSA and we’re denied now you can understand the slander. FUCK YOU CANDACE! The devil works in that woman!
English
134
210
1.3K
40.1K
Meghan Markle News
Meghan Markle News@DuchessMeghan__·
Queen Meghan Markle, The Duchess of Sussex Launched a $1 Million Giving Movement for women who have defied life's hardships which was inspired by her Globally successful podcasts series, Archetypes. thepowersblogging.com/2022/10/14/que…
English
75
37
145
0
Meghan Markle News
Meghan Markle News@DuchessMeghan__·
Her Royal Highness,Princess Meghan aging backwards looking radiant, glowing, and effortlessly chic. Her fashion choices are never just about aesthetics; they are statements of identity, empowerment, and modern royalty. #MeghanMarkle wp.me/pbp9bL-Kp
Meghan Markle News tweet media
English
133
93
744
10K
ELIZABETH LANE
ELIZABETH LANE@imelizabethlane·
There is a full-blown attack on Tucker Carlson right now, and it’s exactly what you’d expect when someone steps outside the approved narrative and says what others won’t. It’s so predictable. Everything Tucker said was grounded in facts and framed in a way that forced people to look at a bigger, more uncomfortable picture. If anything, I would add the role of entrenched power structures in Washington to what he said and the role the US played in all this, but the core point stands, he said what few others are willing to say out loud. And he was right about the regional domination. It’s funny how quickly critics flooded social media, trying to smear him instead of engaging with what he actually said. That reaction alone tells you something. These people are Pathetic. Tucker doesn’t need me or anyone else defending him, he simply doesn't care about these morons, it's obvious. But I’m going to do what I think is right. Tucker is someone who double-checks his sources pretty damn well. So if he said something, it’s probably because it was communicated to him by someone credible. Tucker is a very smart man, he does not make shit up. If he stated something that means he is quoting a source. And for those of you who don’t understand what journalists and news professionals sometimes go through, let me explain. You may have a source telling you something a source you trust and one that has been reliable before and that source may be right. However, there is certain information that, if communicated publicly, could hurt a political situation or escalate tensions between countries, and that’s a no-no. So that source may go ahead and deny it, or, if not the source, the country will. That happens. Happened to me before, a source told me the truth about a story and officially it was denied. Now, I personally have not seen or read anyone denying anything other than Loomer and Yahoo News, lol, but if they did, that happens, I was too busy cheering Dan Crenshaw losing the seat, but you get the point. :))) Let me share something I’ve never said publicly before. The first time I connected to Tucker was through a text. Long story short, An American businessman from Florida, a friend of mine in the entertainment industry, wanted Tucker to appear on his show/program. It wasn’t political. It was about entrepreneurship, self development. The offer was One million dollars for a 40-minute appearance. No politics at all. Just a sit-down none political interview. Tucker said No! He did not ask why, what, when will he pay me, or anything like that. He just said- No! politely. He said no to one million dollars for a non-political appearance for 40 minutes. Tucker is not for sale, and he's not in it for money. I don’t even know if he remembers this, but I do, because that’s when my respect for him first began to form. Almost everyone else I know in this industry with a name of that magnitude has taken money for such appearances, whether it’s speeches or similar events. Tucker doesn’t sell out, not for money, not for pressure, not for popularity. He’s not in this to cash checks or curry favor. He’s in it because he believes he has a responsibility to speak his mind and stand by his beliefs, regardless of the noise. Meanwhile, there are plenty of media personalities who would jump at that kind of payday without hesitation like Dave Rubins of the world and Josh Hammers of the world. Not only they would jump on it, they would probably bend over for it too and these are the people criticizing Tucker. And of course, they always throw Megyn Kelly and Candace into the mix, because why not? These Amoebas, they think they are effective. Tucker isn’t perfect. No one is. But he’s consistent and honest. He knows what he believes, and he’s willing to take the hits that come with saying what he says. In today’s climate, that alone sets him apart.
ELIZABETH LANE tweet media
English
369
1K
5.3K
79.6K
Buckner Stokely
Buckner Stokely@Buckner423·
@imelizabethlane Tucker,Candace,Nick & Meghan all wouldn’t care if another holocaust happened again Even Candace sais Hutler wouldn’t have been so bad if he would have just did it in his country & hadn’t tried taking over the world The holocaust was WRONG no matter How many countries it was in
English
0
0
0
11
Buckner Stokely
Buckner Stokely@Buckner423·
@NJBeisner Let’s start investigating Candace’s family bc her dad was over security at Sandy Hook school when the shooting happened, his words not mine it’s on one of his online resume YouTuber Both sides did a big video on it the other day
English
0
0
0
67
Natalie Jean Beisner
Natalie Jean Beisner@NJBeisner·
Candace says that the Erika Kirk hit piece “was only supposed to be three episodes, but then they posted my manager’s baby, and you just don’t post infants on the internet. And then I added another episode because somebody called my assistant and left a message. So this is how I play. We can go a whole year.” There it is, y’all. She’s stringing this out as retribution, as a game, and for content. Real investigations don’t get episodes and time added on because you’re pissed. If Candace had evidence of who murdered Charlie, she’d take it to the police. But she’s playing a game because she’s an angry, vindictive person using Charlie’s murder as a way to satisfy that anger. It’s sick.
English
298
351
3.6K
184K
Buckner Stokely retweetledi
MEGAMAGA
MEGAMAGA@mountainangel62·
@RealCandaceO If I looked like YOU and Erika looked like this I probably would be jealous too Candace! Especially after she got the guy 😘
MEGAMAGA tweet media
English
18
4
64
2.4K
Buckner Stokely
Buckner Stokely@Buckner423·
@UltraXtremeMaga @RealCandaceO Those are old pics and doesn’t show where their relationship ended She was not invited to their wedding nor where they invited to hers. They went years w/o talking
English
0
0
0
9
Candace Owens
Candace Owens@RealCandaceO·
Today on Bride of Charlie Charlie would have publicly supported war in Iran, according to Blake Neff & Mikey McCoy. Erika has more family ties you should probably know about. Perhaps the question isn’t who, but what took over TPUSA. Episode 4: The Ties That Bind youtube.com/live/jTj9Ip46r…
YouTube video
YouTube
English
936
1.5K
9.3K
720.7K
Buckner Stokely
Buckner Stokely@Buckner423·
@lucasmiles @USAYep @charliekirk11 The level of hate you have for Erica is very revealing & you ba e proven you will say anything & you will say it with no proof, you just go on and on and there is no proof What happened to the Egyptian planes? Of yea ppl knew you were wrong, no apology just go onto something else
English
0
0
0
4
Lucas Miles
Lucas Miles@lucasmiles·
A few recent interviews with John Yep ( @USAYep ) are circulating the claim that Charlie Kirk ( @charliekirk11 ) was in the process of converting to Catholicism. That claim is not accurate, and it needs to be corrected. As the Senior Director of TPUSA’s Faith division and someone who served directly under Charlie’s leadership during the final year and a half of his life, I am in a position to speak plainly about this. I have personally communicated with Charlie’s wife, @MrsErikaKirk, and I also spoke directly with Father Kline, the priest referenced in these discussions. After those conversations, the facts are straightforward: • Charlie was not in the process of converting to Catholicism • He never took Catholic conversion classes (OCIA) • His marriage was never convalidated in the Catholic Church • He was baptized Presbyterian and remained a Bible believing evangelical throughout his life Father Kline indicated concern that his prior comments have been misconstrued and that the current public narrative is not accurately representing his conversations with Charlie’s intentions. Let me be clear, respect for Catholicism is not the same thing as moving toward conversion. Charlie respected many people across denominational lines. Like many evangelicals, including myself, he read widely, including Augustine and Aquinas. None of that constitutes a conversion trajectory. In my own conversations with Charlie, he was firm on justification by grace and did not believe he could biblically reconcile certain Catholic doctrines, including Mariology and the invocation of the Saints. In the few instances he was present at mass, he found it peaceful and beautiful. Charlie enjoyed sitting inside the empty sanctuary to worship in peace without being asked for selfies etc. That is a long way from entering OCIA. If there had been an active conversion process, there would be documentation. There is none. Charlie loved all true Christians, whether Catholic, Orthodox, or Evangelical. Again, that is a long way from entering OCIA. That this even has to be addressed is bizarre. An occasional “fist bump” does not equate to intimate friendship nor give @USAYep the authority to speak on behalf of the dead. I would caution him to take care not to overstate what the facts simply do not support. This is not about scoring theological points. It is about honoring Charlie’s actual life and faith with accuracy and refusing to let speculation rewrite his story.
English
563
563
3.4K
1.4M
Candace Owens
Candace Owens@RealCandaceO·
Today we jump back into our Erika timeline and reveal something interesting about her missing years. Was Lori in Afghanistan? Also, what exactly was Tyler Bowyer doing in Romania? Episode 5: The Lost Years… youtube.com/live/2tFYJf1kl…
YouTube video
YouTube
English
947
1.2K
8.4K
459.7K
Buckner Stokely
Buckner Stokely@Buckner423·
@RealCandaceO Ok Candace I’m going to explain this to you… A woman w/a kid & is unmarried & not living w/the dad she is a single mom Erica’s mom was divorced and wasn’t living with Erica’s dad Meaning a SINGLE MOM YOU ARE WRONG! Again You are wrong A LOT!
English
1
0
1
29
Buckner Stokely
Buckner Stokely@Buckner423·
@RealCandaceO Only a pathetic pos doxes someone from a toddler to their adult life Your pathetic Your family is doing the very thing you accuse of Erica’s family of Your dad was head of security at Sandy Hook when they had the shooting Maybe we need to look into this more
English
0
0
0
9