Xrhmonster
949 posts
Xrhmonster
@ChristosMavrag2
The Cybernetics Group | Member https://t.co/La2w4lAuEf https://t.co/V66RatsoVr
Attiki, Greece Katılım Şubat 2021
1.2K Takip Edilen229 Takipçiler
Xrhmonster retweetledi
Cosmos was struggling long before we became Cosmos Labs, and you know that. 7 separate Cosmos projects tried to sell themselves to us in 2024 and early 2025 because others in the Cosmos ecosystem recognized the decline too.
Putting that aside, we cannot be responsible for the success of projects built on our open source tech that have no commercial relationship with CL or ATOM. We wouldn't have shared in their success, so why should we be blamed for their failure?
Ultimately, we decided not to buy these projects because we didn't see a path to sustaining them or turning them around. The defi ecosystem has continued its decline as a result.
We made that decision, so that we could invest in a future we believed was more sustainable. That's a future based on real world use cases for Cosmos tech: securities tokenization and digital securities depositories like Figure, banking ledgers and tokenized deposits like Wells Fargo's, central bank digital currency issuance like Honduras's CBDC pilot, collateral management, cross border payments. It may work, it may not.
We wish you nothing but the best, and we will continue to push forward with trying to make Cosmos great again.
English
English
Okay,
Will the real $Atom hatoooors please step forward. Spit hate under this post and NOT delete theire reply in the coming weeks/months?
Want to see how many of you are real.
Thanks in advance
$ATOM to $100
English
English
Xrhmonster retweetledi
A new era begins.
cosmos:native generating revenue through genuine partnerships is something the hub and the broader cosmos ecosystem were missing.
tøny@tonyler_
English
Xrhmonster retweetledi
Xrhmonster retweetledi
Banks and institutions repeatedly hint that the future is onchain
Users get:
* Transparency
* Security
* Freedom
Institutions must keep:
* Compliance
* Management
* Oversight
@cosmos can now provide all of this via PoA
Cosmos Labs@cosmoslabs_io
At @thecryptovalley, our co-CEO @BPIV400 discussed how digital ledger technology helps central banks expand access and future-proof their operations with leaders from @BIS_org , Banque Cantonale Vaudoise, and @AMINABankGlobal. x.com/thecryptovalle…
English
Xrhmonster retweetledi
@cosmos The future will have interconnected chains for sure don’t bother with L1s
English
Vitalik announced that the rollup-centric roadmap is over.
For Optimism, Arbitrum, Base, and the rollups built on their frameworks, this raises urgent questions about platform risk, independence, and longterm commercial viability.
Cosmos was built for this moment.
Read more ⬇️
English
I personally am a fan of many of the things that can be called "app chains".
-- Vitalik Buterin
magmar 🇺🇸@0xMagmar
I personally am a fan of many of the things that can be called "app chains". -- Vitalik Buterin
English
Xrhmonster retweetledi
For any L2s that bet on Ethereum and have now been abandoned, please take note:
You owe Ethereum nothing. "Security" is commodized, and the real fight is for users, not alignment.
Switch to being a L1: you can brand however you want, and own 100% of revenue.
Cosmos.
vitalik.eth@VitalikButerin
There have recently been some discussions on the ongoing role of L2s in the Ethereum ecosystem, especially in the face of two facts: * L2s' progress to stage 2 (and, secondarily, on interop) has been far slower and more difficult than originally expected * L1 itself is scaling, fees are very low, and gaslimits are projected to increase greatly in 2026 Both of these facts, for their own separate reasons, mean that the original vision of L2s and their role in Ethereum no longer makes sense, and we need a new path. First, let us recap the original vision. Ethereum needs to scale. The definition of "Ethereum scaling" is the existence of large quantities of block space that is backed by the full faith and credit of Ethereum - that is, block space where, if you do things (including with ETH) inside that block space, your activities are guaranteed to be valid, uncensored, unreverted, untouched, as long as Ethereum itself functions. If you create a 10000 TPS EVM where its connection to L1 is mediated by a multisig bridge, then you are not scaling Ethereum. This vision no longer makes sense. L1 does not need L2s to be "branded shards", because L1 is itself scaling. And L2s are not able or willing to satisfy the properties that a true "branded shard" would require. I've even seen at least one explicitly saying that they may never want to go beyond stage 1, not just for technical reasons around ZK-EVM safety, but also because their customers' regulatory needs require them to have ultimate control. This may be doing the right thing for your customers. But it should be obvious that if you are doing this, then you are not "scaling Ethereum" in the sense meant by the rollup-centric roadmap. But that's fine! it's fine because Ethereum itself is now scaling directly on L1, with large planned increases to its gas limit this year and the years ahead. We should stop thinking about L2s as literally being "branded shards" of Ethereum, with the social status and responsibilities that this entails. Instead, we can think of L2s as being a full spectrum, which includes both chains backed by the full faith and credit of Ethereum with various unique properties (eg. not just EVM), as well as a whole array of options at different levels of connection to Ethereum, that each person (or bot) is free to care about or not care about depending on their needs. What would I do today if I were an L2? * Identify a value add other than "scaling". Examples: (i) non-EVM specialized features/VMs around privacy, (ii) efficiency specialized around a particular application, (iii) truly extreme levels of scaling that even a greatly expanded L1 will not do, (iv) a totally different design for non-financial applications, eg. social, identity, AI, (v) ultra-low-latency and other sequencing properties, (vi) maybe built-in oracles or decentralized dispute resolution or other "non-computationally-verifiable" features * Be stage 1 at the minimum (otherwise you really are just a separate L1 with a bridge, and you should just call yourself that) if you're doing things with ETH or other ethereum-issued assets * Support maximum interoperability with Ethereum, though this will differ for each one (eg. what if you're not EVM, or even not financial?) From Ethereum's side, over the past few months I've become more convinced of the value of the native rollup precompile, particuarly once we have enshrined ZK-EVM proofs that we need anyway to scale L1. This is a precompile that verifies a ZK-EVM proof, and it's "part of Ethereum", so (i) it auto-upgrades along with Ethereum, and (ii) if the precompile has a bug, Ethereum will hard-fork to fix the bug. The native rollup precompile would make full, security-council-free, EVM verification accessible. We should spend much more time working out how to design it in such a way that if your L2 is "EVM plus other stuff", then the native rollup precompile would verify the EVM, and you only have to bring your own prover for the "other stuff" (eg. Stylus). This might involve a canonical way of exposing a lookup table between contract call inputs and outputs, and letting you provide your own values to the lookup table (that you would prove separately). This would make it easy to have safe, strong, trustless interoperability with Ethereum. It also enables synchronous composability (see: ethresear.ch/t/combining-pr… and ethresear.ch/t/synchronous-… ). And from there, it's each L2's choice exactly what they want to build. Don't just "extend L1", figure out something new to add. This of course means that some will add things that are trust-dependent, or backdoored, or otherwise insecure; this is unavoidable in a permissionless ecosystem where developers have freedom. Our job should make to make it clear to users what guarantees they have, and to build up the strongest Ethereum that we can.
English
Xrhmonster retweetledi
In H1 2026, development will focus on extending the protocol’s execution layer and introducing new ways to access liquidity, while staying true to Nolus’ core principles: minimized trust and predictable behavior
Read the full roadmap 👇🏻
medium.com/nolusprotocol/…
English
Xrhmonster retweetledi
Sovereign Day in Buenos Aires was a packed and purely institutional-driven week for @cosmoslabs_io.
We met with regional banks, regulatory entities, financial chambers, public-policy groups, and development organizations across several days of roundtables, meetings, and dinners - including the Senate!
The message was clear: LATAM is moving fast toward neutral and interoperable financial infrastructure, and institutions want solutions that are both practical, and proven.
We shared what is already live across the Cosmos ecosystem:
1. Banking networks in Japan built on Cosmos tech
2. Tokenization and capital-market pilots in LATAM
3. Cross-border and compliance frameworks tested globally
4. Institutional demand for confidentiality + programmability
We also heard directly about their biggest frictions: fragmented rails, slow settlement, compliance bottlenecks, and the challenge of connecting public, private, and regional systems. It’s the first time in a while that Cosmos is properly represented in these tables, and spaces, and coming in to build with these institutions hand in hand. The response was amazing, and planted the seeds of a dozen new initiatives that’ll come to life.
As part of the week, I also participated in Regulation Day with @crecimientoar, which was an important alignment moment between TradFi, FinTech, and Web3 in Argentina, and continued the conversation with many of these institutions.
Huge thanks to everyone who contributed from @protocollabs, ARCHITECT, @UNDP, @parfin_io, @Mastercard, @McKinsey & so many others
Momentum is strong.
We will be back soon to continue working with these institutions and help build the region’s next financial rails, on @cosmos.
English
Xrhmonster retweetledi