Cockimus Fightimus Meridius

2.4K posts

Cockimus Fightimus Meridius banner
Cockimus Fightimus Meridius

Cockimus Fightimus Meridius

@CockimusM

Troll account. My opinions are not my own. Are you not entertained?

Katılım Ocak 2016
463 Takip Edilen104 Takipçiler
Cockimus Fightimus Meridius
@fantasticarg3 @Aristotle7777 Not everything worth doing requires a paycheck. Having children is reward in itself. We have just propagandised women to not believe that anymore yet when you actually listen to them, they yearn for it without knowing.
English
1
0
5
84
Cockimus Fightimus Meridius
We could fix all our political problems by repealing universal suffrage & going to a net tax payer only voting system. If you produce less than you receive, you don’t get to vote. You’re a dependent class and dependents don’t get a say in how things are ran. Simple yet effective.
English
0
0
0
6
Naza🎀
Naza🎀@Juxtmarvel·
i feel men are more tolerant of an intellectually inferior partner than women. if a man is intelligent, he goes for pretty dumb girls bc he can't stand a girl being equal or smarter than him. men just love feeling superior.
English
1.3K
97
854
110.1K
Mr_Fireside 🔥
Mr_Fireside 🔥@Mr_Fireside·
@CockimusM @matt_barrie In the past yes, in the modern day you just end up with something like China, were they're like some weird neo-capitalist-gov state. And we know Albo loves China.
English
2
0
1
19
Cockimus Fightimus Meridius
@fantasticarg3 @Aristotle7777 The protecting of people doesn’t have any tangible thing in front of you that you get for doing it, that’s why you get payed to do it. There obviously is a satisfaction in doing it also. Children are your legacy. Like I said, please don’t have children, for all our sake.
English
0
0
0
11
fantastic
fantastic@fantasticarg3·
@CockimusM @Aristotle7777 The children are the reward for you, because it's not your life , body, time, effort, sacrifice. By your logic, we should not pay policemen, military men etc, their reward is protecting people.
English
1
0
1
24
techsiren ♥︎
techsiren ♥︎@techhsiren·
if the only thing a man chooses to do with his free time is play video games that's not a man
English
222
9
131
11.3K
Divya
Divya@MasalaMoodz·
@Koshur07 Funny how some people think technology can replace the value of women, Artificial wombs may copy biology but they can’t replace love, care, emotions, strength, or the role women play in society Stay respectful 🤡
English
36
0
5
1.2K
Divya
Divya@MasalaMoodz·
If women across the world collectively chose not to have children, humanity itself would come to a halt Never underestimate the power women hold.
English
641
173
745
26.7K
We want TRUTH
We want TRUTH@We_want_truth26·
@CockimusM @bowtiedstocks If you can't see it you are pretty loonie yourself You think it's a coincidence all 3 were in China in the past 2 weeks
English
1
0
0
11
BowTiedStocks
BowTiedStocks@bowtiedstocks·
Most Aussies I don’t think were interested in entering a propadee market casino where the risks of them being financially obliterated and wiped out just from buying a home are extremely probable But alas, unfortunately that is where things have got to for us as a nation…
English
13
6
139
5.7K
Cockimus Fightimus Meridius
@fantasticarg3 @Aristotle7777 It’s evident that you don’t believe that children ARE the reward, while I do. Not everything worth doing is easy. I think with that attitude you shouldn’t have children and work till you’re 90 and pay your taxes.
English
2
0
0
35
fantastic
fantastic@fantasticarg3·
@CockimusM @Aristotle7777 Nice try with your gaslighting, but children cost money and burying yourself in motherhood deserves actual reward, not bs empty words.
English
3
0
1
90
Beyza
Beyza@hicasamadim·
bunu çözersen, sen bir dahisin. çözebilir misin?
Beyza tweet media
Türkçe
51.4K
710
8.6K
4.8M
We want TRUTH
We want TRUTH@We_want_truth26·
@bowtiedstocks Key question here: if Trump really is draining the swamp with Xi and Putin. What would happen to the Australian real estate if the Chinese start going home?
English
1
0
0
65
Iron Heretic
Iron Heretic@Iron_Heretic·
Labor’s Generational Betrayal Once upon a time, tax reform meant expanding prosperity. Now it means managing decline while bribing voters with their own money. Chalmers’ budget does not reform Australia’s tax system. It entrenches its rot. The central fact is brutal: young Australians are being asked to work harder for less while the state takes more. Treasury forecasts productivity growth collapsing to around 1 per cent and below in coming years. Real income growth for young workers is expected to crawl between a quarter and three-quarters of 1 per cent annually. In plain English: an entire generation is being prepared for stagnation. Yet Labor’s answer is higher extraction. Bracket creep will quietly consume nearly half of future wage increases. The harder young Australians work, the more efficiently the tax system harvests them. These are the same people already locked out of home ownership by political cowardice and monetary vandalism. The same generation saddled with enormous HECS debts for increasingly dubious degrees. The same generation handed more than a trillion dollars in public debt and then lectured about “intergenerational equity” by politicians mortgaging their future in real time. And still Labor refuses structural reform. Why? Because genuine reform would force the government to admit something modern politics cannot tolerate: wealth must first be created before it can be redistributed. Productivity, investment, enterprise, risk, and innovation are the source of prosperity. Governments do not generate wealth. They consume it. So instead Australia runs a tax system that punishes productive effort while rewarding speculation and political dependency. Work is taxed heavily. Governments strip more revenue from workers each year while delivering virtually no improvement in real living standards. This is the concealed moral premise beneath the budget: the earnings of productive people belong, by default, to the state. Citizens merely negotiate how much they are allowed to keep. A sane government would reverse the incentives entirely. Lower taxes on work. End bracket creep. Reward production instead of speculation. Reduce the burden of government before it crushes the next generation completely. But Labor survives by expanding dependency, not independence. A productive, self-reliant population is harder to manage than a financially cornered one. So the country remains trapped in the same political catch-22 Ken Henry identified years ago: governments need reform to restore growth, but cannot pursue reform because they rely electorally on the very system causing the decline. The result is a slow generational transfer of wealth, opportunity, and freedom away from young producers and into the hands of an ageing political state that cannot stop spending what it did not earn. Australia does not merely risk economic stagnation. It risks teaching an entire generation that effort no longer leads to advancement — only taxation. @JEChalmers @PaulineHansonOz @AngusTaylorMP
Iron Heretic tweet media
English
27
72
358
170.5K
Cockimus Fightimus Meridius
@AshPolitik Why should the government get another bite at the apple? If I invest my POST taxed income into something that makes a profit. Why should it be taxed again? We either move to a system of no income tax or where the income tax is payed at the end of the year, minus all expenses. All
English
0
0
1
19
Ash
Ash@AshPolitik·
The "death tax" scare campaign is the laziest dog whistle in the playbook. Here are the facts straight from the Budget papers and ATO: Inheritance isn't taxed. Estates aren't taxed. Farms are exempt. Small business CGT concessions are retained in full. Existing testamentary trusts are grandfathered. Fixed testamentary trusts can still be set up for new wills at zero extra tax. The only change: new discretionary testamentary trusts created after 12 May 2026 will pay a 30% minimum on trust income from 2028. There are about 10,500 testamentary trusts in Australia — 1% of all trusts. And only the discretionary, income-splitting variety set up from now on is caught. 30% is what a nurse on $80k already pays on her top dollar. The Right isn't defending battlers. They're defending the tax planning industry that lets wealth split income across grandkids and bucket companies to pay less than wage earners on the same money. If you want to leave assets to your kids, nothing stops you. What's stopping is the loophole.
Ash tweet media
English
314
346
726
19.3K