Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Dan Neu
821 posts

Dan Neu retweetledi
Dan Neu retweetledi
Dan Neu retweetledi

My Uber driver asked what I do for work.
"Software."
"Cool. Can you look at something?"
He handed me his phone at a red light. Terminal. Claude chat. Green P&L.
+$6,200.
He drives Uber 4 days a week. Makes $1,100. Has a 2-year-old daughter.
"Where did you find this?"
"Your article. The 14,000 wallets one."
He read it three months ago. Didn't understand half of it. Asked Claude to explain it like he's five.
214 messages. All during breaks between rides. Parked at gas stations. Waiting for pings.
First thing Claude told him: 87% of wallets lose money. Don't be the 87%.
He installed poly_data. Fed it to Claude. Found 47 wallets with Sharpe above 2.0. Filtered crypto only. Quarter Kelly. $200 starting bankroll. From his tips.
93 messages later Claude helped him build the 20-line brain from the article. Bayesian updates. EV filter at 5%. Fully automated.
Last 45 days:
→ 480 trades
→ 91.3% win rate
→ +$6,200
Best trade: whale convergence on Fed rate cut. 4 wallets entered in 2 minutes. Entry $0.12. Resolved $1.00. +$1,760. While dropping off a passenger at JFK.
The passenger tipped him $5. The bot made $1,760.
His wife found the Telegram alerts on his phone. Thought he was texting another woman.
He showed her the P&L curve.
"Can you make me one?"
"How long until you quit driving?"
He looked at me through the rearview mirror.
"I'm not stopping. Uber is my cover story."
I wrote the article. He actually opened terminal.
You only need Claude + laptop + 1 hour/day.
Giving This Free for 24 hours. To get it:
1. Comment the word 'AutoPilot'
2. Like and Retweet this post
3. Follow me
@ZayvenKnox
English

My ex-Girlfriend works at Grayscale. He left me because I was "obsessed with losing money on prediction markets"
He was right. i was down $3,400 over four months
he texted me out of nowhere last week
"someone sent me a screenshot. is that your wallet"
it was. +$11,400. 30 days
i didn't respond for three hours. then sent one message
"yeah"
he called immediately
"what changed"
i stopped predicting. started reading microstructure
every 5 minutes a new BTC market opens on Polymarket. will BTC be above or below the target price. 400+ times per day. everyone trades them like a coin flip. i used to also
then i spent two weeks just watching the order book. not trading. just watching
smart money never enters immediately. they wait 60-90 seconds. every time. right before they enter - bid depth spikes above 1.8x ask depth. 30-second window. then it's gone
that's not random. that's a signal
opened Claude at 1am. gave it three weeks of order book data
"find the lag between Binance and Chainlink. find what imbalance looks like before a correct outcome. find the exact entry window"
by 4am Claude had the full pattern
"Chainlink lags Binance by 14 seconds. when both Binance and Coinbase move $50 in the same direction - Chainlink follows 94% of the time. imbalance above 1.8 in the 60-180 second window confirms direction"
two signals. that's the entire system
signal one: both exchanges moved $50. Chainlink hasn't updated. bot enters before it does
signal two: imbalance above 1.8 - buyers stacking. below 0.55 - sellers dominant. only valid 60-180 seconds after open. outside that - noise
both agree - enter. one quiet - skip
exit: shares hit 75c - sell. don't hold to resolution. on-chain settlement takes time. last 90 seconds you can't get out
85% of windows killed before the bot touches them.
week 1: +$1,400
week 2: +$2,800
week 3: +$4,100
week 4: +$3,100
1,847 markets. 71% win rate. avg win +$34. avg loss -$19. sharpe 2.84
my stack:
Claude Code - $20/mo
VPS Hetzner - $5/mo
polymarket-cli - free
poly_data - free
$2,000 seed. +$11,400. 30 days
he was quiet for a long time
"so you found a 14-second gap in a price feed"
yeah
"and built a bot around it in one weekend"
yeah
"i work at Grayscale. we have quant teams looking for edges like this"
i know
"how much did it cost"
$25 a month
He didn't say anything for a while
then: "i think i made a mistake"
i closed the terminal and went to sleep
You only need laptop + 1 hour/day.
Giving This Free for 24 hours. To get it:
1. Comment the word 'GrayScale'
2. Like and Retweet this post
3. Follow me
@ZayvenKnox
English
Dan Neu retweetledi

The market tells you the entire day's direction before 9:30 AM even opens
Not with indicators. Not with news. Not with "gut feeling"
With a single candle that printed 3 hours before you woke up
95% of retail traders show up at 9:30 blind. The 5% who check this one thing already know which way the market is going before the opening bell rings
Here's what nobody teaches you:
Every trading day has a script. And the script gets written between 2:00-6:00 AM while you're sleeping
It works like this:
The market moves in sessions. Asia. London. New York. Each session has a job. And if you understand the job of each session, you already know what the next one is going to do before it opens
The sequence:
If the previous session REVERSED - the next session CONTINUES
If Asia reversed? London continues. If London reversed? New York continues. If no session reversed? New York is the reversal
That's it. That's the entire daily script. The market rotates between reversal and continuation across sessions. It has done this every single day for decades
Here's how the script actually plays out:
SCENARIO 1: London reversal -> New York continuation
London opens at 2:00 AM. It pushes price into a key level - previous day's high or low, a fair value gap, a relevant swing. It sweeps the liquidity. It reverses. By 6:00 AM, London has already decided the direction
The 6:00 AM candle confirms it. If it swept a high and closed back below it - bearish day. If it swept a low and closed back above it — bullish day
Now New York opens at 9:30. The direction is already decided. NY's job is not to figure out where the market is going. NY's job is to CONTINUE what London started
This is why the 9:30-11:00 window is so powerful. You're not guessing. You're continuing a move that's already confirmed
Price opens. It pulls back into a fair value gap that London's expansion created. That gap is your entry. Stop behind the gap. Target the next liquidity pool. Done by 10:30
SCENARIO 2: No previous session reversed → New York reversal
Asia consolidated. London consolidated. No session made a move. No expansion. No gaps. No direction
This means New York has to do it. 9:30 is the reversal session
This is where the volume comes in. 8:30 news or 9:30 open - institutions use this to push price into a key level, grab liquidity, and reverse
You wait for the sweep. You wait for the displacement. You wait for the V-shape signature - aggressive move in, aggressive move out, gap forms. That's your reversal confirmation
SCENARIO 3: Asia reversal → London and New York continue
This is the highest probability day. Asia already put in the low or high of the day. Every session after just expands in the same direction
When Asia is the low of day, the 4-hour candles that form after will be expansion candles. Those expansion candles create gaps. Those gaps are your entries for London and New York continuation
You mark the gap within the previous 4-hour candle's range. You wait for price to pull back into it. You enter. Same direction all day. Multiple opportunities. Same setup repeating
The model behind all of this:
Price only does two things. It moves from internal liquidity to external liquidity. Then back. Forever
Internal = fair value gaps. Where orders didn't fill. Where price returns
External = swing highs and lows. Where stops sit. Where price sweeps
Price sweeps external -> fills internal -> targets opposite external
Every session. Every day. Every asset. Every time frame
The session just tells you WHEN the next leg of that cycle starts
How I use this every morning:
6:00 AM - Check the 4-hour chart. Did the previous session reverse or just consolidate? If London reversed, I'm trading New York continuation. If nobody reversed, I'm trading New York reversal
6:05 AM - Mark the 6 AM candle. Did it sweep a key level and close back inside the range? Reversal day. Did it expand through? Continuation day
9:15 AM - Mark the gap from London's expansion. That's my entry zone. Mark the next external liquidity. That's my target
9:30 AM - Watch for price to pull back into the gap. If I'm trading continuation, I want a shallow retracement. If I'm trading reversal, I want the V-shape
9:45 AM - Entry confirmed. Stop behind the gap. Target the next draw on liquidity
10:30 AM - Either in profit or stopped out. Done
11:00 AM - Laptop closed. Day is over
A trader I work with used to show up at 9:30 and "react to price action" for 6 hours. 43% win rate. Breaking even after fees
I told him one thing: check what the previous session did before you sit down
He started profiling sessions. London reversed? He only looked for continuation. Nobody reversed? He waited for the 9:30 sweep and reversal setup. No setup in the first 90 minutes? He closed the laptop
Same strategy. Same setups. Same risk. Added one filter
Win rate went from 43% to 64%. First funded account within 60 days. Now he's done trading by 10:30 every morning
He didn't learn a new strategy. He learned to read the script that the market writes every morning before he wakes up
The sessions tell you the direction. This model tells you the entry. The gap tells you where. The sweep tells you when
Most traders spend 6 hours searching for setups that the market already showed them at 6 AM
The script is free. It prints every single morning. You just have to learn to read it
Or keep showing up at 9:30 blind and wondering why you're not profitable
Your choice
(I teach session profiling and the model i use inside my free Discord. Live every morning before the open. Link in bio. DM me "SYSTEM" for 1-on-1 coaching)
English

Happy 1st birthday to @TradingLucid 🎉
🎂 Only 1 year old:
$100M paid out
200K happy traders
🚀 The fastest growing prop firms ever.
Why?
- No monthly fees.
- Instant funded activation.
- Payouts in minutes.
- Zero issues/denials
That’s how you win trust fast. ♥️
English
Dan Neu retweetledi

The reason you’re an unprofitable trader isn’t because you don’t have enough capital
It’s because you treat your current capital as if it is not enough
Even if you have $200 in your trading account - trade it like it’s $5M
That will give you a focus on capital preservation, risk management and you’ll avoid taking dumb trades because you don’t want to lose $50k (in this fictional scenario)
You will only become profitable when you start treating your current capital with respect and want to preserve it
Until then it doesn’t matter how much capital you have, you’ll keep losing
English
Dan Neu retweetledi
Dan Neu retweetledi
Dan Neu retweetledi
Dan Neu retweetledi

every time i feel myself going on a losing streak
i switch over to an excel sheet and journal. whenever emotions tend to come in i just take my time and make the journaling process even longer to create space in between trades
open up a simple excel sheet, write everything manually
entry price, stop price, exit price, all of the significant numbers.
sometimes its best to elongate this process as it helps me not rush into next trades
English
Dan Neu retweetledi
Dan Neu retweetledi
Dan Neu retweetledi

ICT's mentorship is The Best Trading Education on the internet. Free. 🔥 @I_Am_The_ICT
But with hundreds of videos, knowing where to start can be tough.
🔗 funded.now/ict-mentorship
So I built a Full Syllabus — every lesson organized from beginner to advanced so you can follow along step by step.
Bookmark this and share it with someone who needs it.
English
Dan Neu retweetledi

A trader I know blew 5 accounts in 2 years.
Not small accounts. $8k, $12k, $15k, $10k, $6k. Over $50,000 gone.
Same pattern every time: Build it up. Get confident. Size up. Blow up.
He knew what he was doing wrong. He just couldn't stop.
Then he tried something different. Here's the sequence:
DAY 1-30: The Tracking Phase
Instead of trading differently, he just tracked everything:
Every trade logged with:
- Screenshot of entry
- What he was feeling
- Whether it was planned or impulsive
- Grade: A+, B, or C setup
- Risk taken vs. risk planned
30 days. 34 trades. All documented.
DAY 31-45: The Audit
He reviewed the data. The patterns were brutal:
Planned trades: 62% win rate
Impulsive trades: 28% win rate
Trades under 2% risk: 59% win rate
Trades over 2% risk: 31% win rate
After a winning day: 67% win rate next trade
After 2+ winning days: 34% win rate (overconfidence)
The blowups weren't random. They were predictable.
DAY 46-75: The Rules Phase
He built rules from his own data:
1. Every trade must be written in pre-market plan
2. 1% risk max. No exceptions. Ever.
3. After 2 green days in a row, next day is half size
4. Stop trading after 2 losses (his data showed revenge cycles)
He followed these rules with zero flexibility.
Results: +$2,400 on a $5,000 account. No drawdown over 4%.
DAY 76-120: The Challenge Phase
Confidence backed by data. He bought a $50k prop firm challenge.
Same rules. Same patience. Same selectivity.
Passed in 22 days.
Bought a $100k challenge. Passed in 31 days.
DAY 120: The Result
$150k in funded capital.
Total cost: $600 in challenge fees.
The same guy who lost $50k+ in 2 years was now trading six figures.
What Actually Changed ↓
Not his strategy. He used the same setups.
Not his psychology. He still felt the same urges.
What changed: He had data that showed exactly when he screwed up. And rules built from that data.
The journal made the pattern undeniable.
The rules made the fix automatic.
The tracking made the improvement measurable.
He didn't become a better trader. He became a more aware one.
English

I'm so excited to share that we are acquiring the financial services app, @step
Nobody taught me about investing, building credit, or managing money when I was growing up. That's exactly why we’re joining forces with Step! I want to give millions of young people the financial foundation I never had. Lots to share soon :D
English
Dan Neu retweetledi

Tom Dante's execution webinar changed how I trade.
It's the most complete trading psychology lesson I've found—for free.
I rewatched it, took detailed notes, and extracted the 4 rules that separate pros from amateurs.
If you're serious about trading, read this:
All credits: @Trader_Dante

English







