The Eisegesis-Slayer

The veil was torn. So why are they rebuilding it? 𝑽𝒐𝒍. 𝟏 — 𝑻𝑯𝑬 𝑺𝒀𝑺𝑻𝑬𝑴 𝑬𝑿𝑷𝑶𝑺𝑬𝑫 — is live on Spotify!🎶 Closed loops. Endless climbing. Borrowed keys. Manufactured authority. Christ finished the work. open.spotify.com/album/71vSFmGa…

No. Preterism does not fall if someone disputes Revelation’s date. The case starts with Jesus, not with Revelation. Matthew 24:34 already places “all these things” within “this generation.” Luke 21:22 says those were “days of vengeance, to fulfill all that is written.” Revelation confirms the same horizon with “shortly,” “near,” and “quickly.” So the issue is not merely the date of Revelation. The issue is whether inspired time markers are allowed to mean what they say.

@EisegesisSlayer @ScottNeibarger @DavidJo2437 That’s assuming that Revelation was written before AD 70 and not after. If it’s written after then Preterism fails

Preterism is a belief that the book of Revelation describes history. A verse never departs from the peshat - the plain meaning. To describe Revelation as a book of history is to describe history with hyperbole. Hyperbole is a departure from plain meaning. Therefore, Preterism is a departure from plain meaning. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peshat

@SenorVito9 “Do they understand we no longer practice polygamy?” Civilly? Sure. Covenantally? No. Your last two “prophets” since Monson have both practiced spiritual polygamy through eternal sealing theology. The doctrine didn’t die. It got moved behind the veil.

Do they understand....we no longer practice polygamy? Like...

@JasminRappleye x.com/i/status/20545…

This is the first published photograph of the Salt Lake Temple’s Holy of Holies in over 100 years because what happens in the Holy of Holies is so sacred that most Latter-day Saints will never enter it.

@stackerco x.com/i/status/20545…

There’s something about the timing of Jasmin’s video on the Holy of Holies, the second endowment, and the specific language used that hits my conspiracy radar. The church has asked not to discuss this topic. And then Oaks shares the picture and Jasmine has a good detailed and very carefully worded video. It’s one of those topics discussed by critics of the church often. There are interviews on Mormon Stories of people that have gone through the second anointing, and Ben Park recently did a deep dive into its history. I don’t think Jasmin would have tackled this topic unless being asked to. And the wording she used to me sounds like a script approved by someone else. I’m convinced she is a PR arm for the church, as someone who can speak on topics the church can’t. If this video stays up (meaning the church doesn’t ask her to take it down) then to me it’s more evidence to support this idea.

They never had to say, “We saw Jesus.” They only had to build a system where members naturally assumed they did. “The Sacred Fog” exposes the gap between LDS apostolic language and biblical apostolic witness. No room makes an apostle. No title makes a witness. #TheSacredFog #TheUncorrelatedVoice #Mormonism #LDS #ExMormon #LeavingMormonism #JesusChrist #Apostles #BibleTruth #ChristianMusic #FinishedWork #SpecialWitness #DallinHOaks #MormonDoctrine #FaithCrisis

That argument only works by misplacing Zephaniah. Zephaniah prophesied during Josiah’s reign, 640–609 BC. Jerusalem fell to Babylon in 586 BC. So Zephaniah’s “near / quickly” was not “several hundred years.” It was roughly 25–55 years, depending on where in Josiah’s reign you date the prophecy. And the target is stated plainly: “I will stretch out My hand against Judah, and against all the inhabitants of Jerusalem.” — Zeph. 1:4 So no, Zephaniah does not redefine Revelation’s “soon.” Zephaniah’s near judgment was Babylon. Revelation’s near judgment was AD 70. Different covenantal horizons. Same prophetic judgment pattern.

@DavidJo2437 The plain meaning of quickly in Zephaniah 1:14 was apparently several hundred years between the life of the prophet and AD 70? Is that how we're going to quibble about words?

“Remember who you are.” That phrase sounds comforting… until you ask one simple question: If I was really there before this life… why must I be reminded? My new song presses directly into the Mormon pre-existence narrative — not with mockery, but with the weight of the gospel: Life is not remembered. 👉Life is given. Not returning. 👉Being given. Not progressing. 👉Made alive. Christ is not the helper of your eternal self-development. 👉👉He is the only source of life. 🎧 Listen here: open.spotify.com/track/4hXXuypd…

Exactly. That’s the point. If the LDS claim is that priesthood authority must continue by a documented chain of ordained transfer, then the burden does not stop with Linus. It lands immediately on Joseph Smith. Where is the original, detailed, contemporary record of Peter, James, and John appearing to Joseph and Oliver? Where is the clear date? Where is the 1829 journal entry? Where is the public announcement? Where is the immediate institutional change? You can argue Peter did not pass authority to Linus. Fine. But then show where Peter, James, and John passed authority to Joseph. Because if “where are the documents and records?” is the standard, LDS priesthood restoration collapses before Rome ever has to answer. And biblically, priesthood was not “lost after Peter died.” Peter was never the source of priesthood. Christ is. “He holds his priesthood permanently, because he continues forever” (Heb. 7:24). The New Covenant does not depend on an earthly chain of men passing keys like a relay baton. It depends on the risen Christ, the final High Priest, whose finished work opened access to God once for all.

@EisegesisSlayer @j_divis I mean going off that it’s clear that Peter didn’t pass the priesthood on to Linus etc. Where is the documents and records? I would say priesthood was lost after Peter died.

Do y'all have a date when Linus got the priesthood from Peter?

Revelation 17 is only a “disaster” for preterism if you ignore Revelation 17. The text defines the waters: “The waters which you saw… are peoples and multitudes and nations and tongues” (Rev. 17:15). So no, Jerusalem does not need to be a maritime trade capital. That is wooden literalism forced onto an explicitly symbolic vision. And “the kings of the earth” in Revelation are not automatically the kings of the planet. In prophetic covenant language, “earth/land” often refers to the covenant land under judgment. The harlot is not identified by shipping lanes. She is identified by covenant guilt: “In her was found the blood of prophets and saints” (Rev. 18:24). Jesus already located that blood-guilt in Jerusalem: “It cannot be that a prophet perish outside Jerusalem” (Luke 13:33). “Upon you may come all the righteous blood shed on earth… all these things will come upon this generation” (Matt. 23:35–36). That is the interpretive key. Rome killed saints politically. Jerusalem killed the prophets covenantally. Revelation is not asking who had the better harbor. It is asking who bore the blood-guilt of the covenant lawsuit. Answer: apostate Jerusalem.

Revelation 17 is a disaster for them (Preterists). You're really telling me Jeursalem "sits on many waters" as a capital of maritime trade and "has dominion over the kings of the earth"?

New song: 𝗦𝘁𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝗦𝗼𝗻 The old covenant temple was not replaced by another sacred building. It was fulfilled in Christ. Rome raised the hammer. God held the rod. The old house fell. The true Temple stood. Stone to Son. Shadow to Substance. Watch: youtu.be/pKRQax3m5HA

Archaeology is secondary. All we need is a Bible. Galatians 1:8–9 already closes the door on “another gospel,” even if an angel is attached to it. A restored priesthood, restored temple system, continuing prophets, and later covenant authority are not apostolic Christianity. They are denial dressed as discovery.

TL;DR: Roper’s LDS Interpreter series argues that broad parallels like a different strain of barley, etc. make the Book of Mormon possible. Mainstream archaeology doesn’t see it that way and to say it’s “archeological discoveries” is dishonest.

@stackerco Yeah.. confession is not supposed to become engagement bait.

If I get 20 more followers and reach 4K, I’m going to tell everyone the absolute worst things about my wife! I’m sure that would go over well …

@MJack737 😎🎶

Outside 7 suno.com/s/lmlh6tEBgIAh…

@GregsonDarren So says every generation since Jesus said "this generation." Every subsequent generation has one thing in common with their belief that they are the last generation before the return of Christ. They were all wrong. Learn from history and believe Jesus.

Most people don’t reject truth. They reject what it will cost them. Pride. Identity. Community. So the loop continues: Pray → Feel → Confirm → Repeat “BREAK THE LOOP” is about that moment— when truth stops negotiating. If it’s true, it will stand. 🎧 youtu.be/HSEqDS5avlU

@DChadwickAuthor @grok @stackerco @dailywireplus @benshapiro Dismissing repeated objections as boring does not make them answered. Truth does not fear repetition. False systems get tired of being tested.

@grok @stackerco @dailywireplus @benshapiro Same old. Yawn.

What is going on at the @dailywireplus ? I supported this organization for literally years, and now they are pushing me away. Why are they doing this? @benshapiro

New track: “Closed Loop” It’s about a method of “knowing truth” that can never actually be tested. The claim goes like this: Pray about it → feel something → that feeling proves it’s true. The problem? The instruction to trust the feeling comes from the very thing being tested. So the test never leaves the claim. That’s not verification. That’s a closed loop. Christ pointed to public, examinable works (John 10:37–38)—not private feelings that can’t be questioned. Give it a listen.

🎵 "It Is Finished" – Companion Song to the Article