Fundraiser.com

128 posts

Fundraiser.com

Fundraiser.com

@FundraiserTRW

Katılım Ağustos 2024
223 Takip Edilen9 Takipçiler
Fundraiser.com
Fundraiser.com@FundraiserTRW·
@samgeorgegh 1 peswa you wilt get I’m making 7000$ a Month from my sass and I pay my taxes but this bill my ass won’t work🫵
English
0
0
0
29
Sam 'Dzata' George 🦁🇬🇭
I have always reiterated that personally and officially, I am always open to informed and constructive criticism and opinions. Criticisms that jump on bandwagon trends and fail to be based on fact are treated with contempt because they are not only mischievous but intended to misinform. To all the 'IT Professionals' who all of a sudden are making all manner of spurious claims that the @MoCDTI through its Agency - @NITAGhana - is acting illegally, please read the National Information Technology Agency Act, 2008 (Act 771), Electronic Transactions Act, 2008 (Act 772), the Fees and Charges (Miscellaneous Provisions) Regulations, 2023 (L.I. 2481) and the Fees and Charges (Miscellaneous Provisions) (Amendments) Regulations 2025 (L.I. 2512). The Ministry is simply ENFORCING existing legislation that has been on our books since 2008, 2023 and 2025. The proposed new legislation has NOT even been laid before Parliament. I welcome anyone to point out which specific action of the Agency is NOT backed by a provision under the stated legislation. We have a Country to build, and we will ensure enforcement and sanity in our Technology space. Cheers.
Sam 'Dzata' George 🦁🇬🇭 tweet mediaSam 'Dzata' George 🦁🇬🇭 tweet mediaSam 'Dzata' George 🦁🇬🇭 tweet mediaSam 'Dzata' George 🦁🇬🇭 tweet media
English
386
112
513
295.6K
Fundraiser.com
Fundraiser.com@FundraiserTRW·
@samgeorgegh We don’t care you are criminal broad daylight And it won’t work we are ready to go to jail
English
0
0
0
31
Nii Commey
Nii Commey@niicommey01·
You are using Lorem Ipsum on your website, and you're trying to charge me 20k for "license"? A whole government website. Supposed ICT Authority. Scrap the whole organisation. What a flipping joke.
Nii Commey tweet mediaNii Commey tweet media
English
174
709
1.4K
145.4K
Hilla Doe
Hilla Doe@HillaDoe·
Ghana wants to be a regional techhub & at the same time @NITAGhana wants to regulate who is allowed to work in the tech sector and which tech products get operational licenses. This is a bad idea 👎. #NITAdropthebill, shoutout to @kwekutech for consistently pointing this out
English
6
100
178
2.5K
Fundraiser.com
Fundraiser.com@FundraiserTRW·
@DevCongress Those who are weak will accept else they have to take all engineers to prison
English
0
0
1
126
SIKAOFFICIAL🦍
SIKAOFFICIAL🦍@SIKAOFFICIAL1·
“We place all the Bibles and Qurans on the table. When you come and pick one, they are treated as instruments of work and used as such.” — Chairperson of the Public Accounts Committee, Hon. Abena Osei-Asare, responding to a request by the Headmistress of Islamic Girls’ Senior High School, Suhum, Mrs. Safia Salifu, for the Quran to be placed in a separate box, not mixed with any other books or documents and handled only by a Muslim during committee hearings. [🎥: GhanaTalkRadio]
English
583
365
3.4K
1.8M
Fundraiser.com
Fundraiser.com@FundraiserTRW·
@TheDumbTechGuy So all tech guys should send their data to them🤣🤣 Their twaaacedi We will all go to court Only the weak tech guys will accept
English
0
0
0
77
TheSophisticatedDumbTechGuy
TheSophisticatedDumbTechGuy@TheDumbTechGuy·
Highlights of the new proposal
TheSophisticatedDumbTechGuy tweet media
TheSophisticatedDumbTechGuy@TheDumbTechGuy

@NITAGhana I'm not sure why you're so intent on coming for the tech industry. Now you want to restrict private organizations from hiring us unless we get a government certification? What have we done to you? Seriously. You keep doing this. It simply cannot be accidental.

English
40
83
122
33.2K
TheSophisticatedDumbTechGuy
TheSophisticatedDumbTechGuy@TheDumbTechGuy·
@NITAGhana I'm not sure why you're so intent on coming for the tech industry. Now you want to restrict private organizations from hiring us unless we get a government certification? What have we done to you? Seriously. You keep doing this. It simply cannot be accidental.
English
38
89
180
61.5K
Fundraiser.com
Fundraiser.com@FundraiserTRW·
@MichaelAsiedu_ Only the weak tech guys will accept Man we will all go to court Their teaaaacedi
English
0
0
0
1
Michael Asiedu
Michael Asiedu@MichaelAsiedu_·
NITA sent me a DM. We had a short conversation. They say I’m “misunderstanding the Data Harmonisation Bill.” That the Hub won’t collect all citizen data but will only pull basic info like names or dates of birth from existing databases to make government services faster. Let’s unpack that. First, that’s their intent. But the Bill’s text defines the Hub as “the central national infrastructure for the provision and exchange of public-interest data.” And “public-interest data” means any data necessary or beneficial for public purposes. That’s extremely broad. They claim they “won’t store health or tax data.” But the bill nowhere forbids it. (I'm not sharing FULL screenshots for ethical purposes) There’s no clause limiting NITA’s access by data category. The only safeguard mentioned is to “ensure compliance with the Data Protection Act,” a general reminder, not a legal firewall. They told me, “If we breach, you can take us to court.” That’s the real problem. It means NITA can act first, and you challenge later. That’s reactive accountability and not preventive oversight. Clause 4(5) puts the Hub “under the policy direction of the Minister of Communications.” So whoever controls that ministry controls the data infrastructure. We will have political visibility baked into the system itself. Clauses 5–8 let NITA: • compel any public body to connect, • set technical standards and APIs, • inspect databases, and • sanction non-compliant institutions, all without court approval. Clause 39, the one they quoted in my conversation with them, doesn’t block those powers. It only says the Act should be read “together with” other laws. Clause 39(2) of the Bill says: “Where there is any conflict between this Act and any relevant enactment in respect of the standardisation and sharing of data, the provisions of this Act shall prevail.” Meaning: this law overrides the Data Protection Act wherever they disagree. So if NITA orders an agency to share data and the Data Protection Commission objects, NITA wins because this Bill gives itself supremacy on all data-sharing issues. Also. different agencies hold data separately by design.The NITA Bill removes that separation. It creates one entry point where access depends on policy, not court approval. This is the same design India, Kenya, and Uganda used, where each was sold as efficient. They later became a tool for surveillance or exclusion. So yes, NITA says, trust us. But in my learnings, power doesn’t abuse itself on day one. Abuse starts when no one is paying attention
Michael Asiedu tweet mediaMichael Asiedu tweet mediaMichael Asiedu tweet media
English
15
159
226
46.4K