🐐🛸Hayerjan.base.eth.ink 🐉(🦄,🦄)(✸,✸)🇦🇲 π²

yeah, probably wouldn't have happened ika's architecture doesn't use traditional bridges. assets stay on native chains with MPC coordination instead of wrapped tokens moving through verifiers the kelpdao exploit was possible because layerzero let them deploy with a 1/1 DVN config. single verifier = single point of failure. minted 116k fake rsETH and defi protocols accepted it as real collateral ika's model avoids that entirely. no bridge to compromise, no wrapped assets to fake, no single verifier approving transactions. decentralized key management instead of permissioned bridge operators the exploit extracted $200m+ because the security model relied on trusting one entity. ika's design doesn't have that dependency