HydraDom

160 posts

HydraDom banner
HydraDom

HydraDom

@Hydra_Dom

General markets and trading connoisseur

New York, NY Katılım Temmuz 2024
84 Takip Edilen20 Takipçiler
HydraDom
HydraDom@Hydra_Dom·
@0xgiyux To make it more clear you have to be a maker, you cannot put on any of this as a taker the fees eat way too much. But being a maker is an implied need for any sports market, hard to find something that’s good after fees
English
0
0
0
7
HydraDom
HydraDom@Hydra_Dom·
@0xgiyux Not sure what you mean by capping positions? The only cap is your capital. It was 4 cents of EV per contract before the goal, which you could derive by assuming the moneyline markets are fair
English
1
0
0
19
HydraDom
HydraDom@Hydra_Dom·
Fading Tottenham relegation on Kalshi has about 4 cents to it in expected value. Sorry if I’m spoiling and edge the networking EV is worth more to me
English
1
0
1
72
HydraDom
HydraDom@Hydra_Dom·
It’s so nice to be a trillion dollar market maker on Wall Street while eating quiche and watching soccer on peacock
English
0
0
0
8
HydraDom
HydraDom@Hydra_Dom·
This is only the arb fwiw
English
0
0
0
9
HydraDom
HydraDom@Hydra_Dom·
Pretty tight spread on Kalshi between the Tottenham Everton / West Ham Leeds / EPL Relegation markets. Even as a maker you’re earning under a quarter after fees per contract to put it on
English
1
0
0
181
Quant
Quant@quant_xbt·
Not a trader: You can’t beat the market. EMH. 1 year as a quant trader: EMH is the dumbest thing academia ever came up with. Markets are obviously inefficient. 3 years as a quant trader: JFC. Every edge is crowded, every signal decays, and the market is basically efficient the moment I try to trade it.
English
20
19
394
44.2K
HydraDom
HydraDom@Hydra_Dom·
@mattkalish First tweet I haven’t scrolled past of yours, love the work but can’t read so only watch videos
English
0
0
1
532
Matt Kalish
Matt Kalish@mattkalish·
I’ve said my piece on Kalshi and have nothing further on the topic. We must stop the Kalshi gaslighting of retail bettors. I’m calling on all nations to come together and stop these fake marketing and PR teams from lying to the normal gambler. Now watch me hit this drive.
English
60
2
129
36.5K
HydraDom
HydraDom@Hydra_Dom·
@AgustinLebron3 @bennpeifert We could learn a lot but even as a moderately experienced vol trader this is a wake up call when I’m trying to follow it all.
English
0
0
3
1K
HydraDom
HydraDom@Hydra_Dom·
The Benn Eifert thread is enough to make a grown man cry
English
0
0
0
87
HydraDom
HydraDom@Hydra_Dom·
Flopping is GTO in the current rule set. It’s not that deep, the rules need to be shaved
English
0
0
0
16
HydraDom
HydraDom@Hydra_Dom·
They aren’t parlays says the man who goes on to define a parlay.
Max@maxyatsuk

Polymarket may be building the biggest upgrade prediction markets have ever seen I’ve been digging through the new Polymarket v2 contracts and found something much bigger than “parlays are coming.” Under the hood, this looks like infrastructure for trading entire probabilistic scenarios. A new contract called Combinatorial Module was deployed and verified on Amoy testnet, and the deployer is linked to an address Polygonscan labels as Polymarket: Deployer 1. So this does not look theoretical anymore. The core idea is simple: instead of trading isolated events, traders could trade entire chains of outcomes as a single position. Right now prediction markets mostly work like this: 1. Trump wins 2. BTC above $150k 3. Fed cuts rates 4. Recession in 2026 Each market exists independently. But real traders rarely think in isolated events. They think in causal chains. For example: If Trump wins, crypto gets a regulatory tailwind, BTC rallies, risk-on returns, and capital rotates back into high-beta assets. The interesting part is that the new module allows this exact structure to become one position: 1.1 Trump wins 1.2 AND BTC > $150k 1.3 AND Fed cuts rates Not three separate bets. One asset, one payout, one expression of a worldview. And if all legs resolve correctly, the position pays out $1. That means traders can buy cheap convex exposure to an entire macro thesis. If the market prices the scenario at 8¢ and the full chain plays out, the position settles for $1. This is where prediction markets start looking less like betting apps and more like probability derivatives. What makes this even more interesting is that the module appears to work cross-category. Sports, politics, crypto, macro, geopolitics — anything represented as binary/negrisk conditions can theoretically be combined. The contract supports up to 50 legs in a single structure. And the positions are not static. The code includes mechanics for: – splitting positions – merging them – extracting legs – recombining scenarios – compressing resolved conditions – and wrapping existing binary markets into combinatorial positions. In other words: this is not just “build a parlay and wait.” It is closer to building dynamic scenario structures that evolve as the world changes. The NO-side is where things become especially interesting! There is a very important distinction here: NO(A AND B AND C) is NOT the same thing as: NO(A) AND NO(B) AND NO(C) The first one is the complement of the entire scenario: NOT(A AND B AND C) meaning the structure fails if any part of the chain breaks. That subtle difference is why these markets become much more sophisticated than standard YES/NO betting. The market is no longer pricing isolated outcomes. It is pricing the stability of an entire connected narrative. This opens the door to a completely different class of products. At that point, prediction markets stop being “Will X happen?” They become: “Which version of the future is currently mispriced?” There are still two massive open problems. The first is liquidity. Every scenario gets its own conditionId / positionId, but the contract itself does not imply that every combination will have its own standalone orderbook. And if liquidity fragments across millions of possible scenarios, the system breaks immediately. Which means the real unlock is probably synthetic pricing and routing: using liquidity from underlying markets to construct and price scenario positions dynamically. The second challenge is UX. Because probability algebra gets confusing very quickly. Most users will not intuitively understand the difference between: NO(A AND B) and: NO(A) AND NO(B) So the challenge is no longer just building markets. It is building interfaces that make complex probabilistic structures understandable to humans. If Polymarket solves liquidity and UX, v2 may become much more than a prediction market upgrade. It could become the first real probability trading layer for the internet. Bullish. Huge W @devjoshstevens @mustafap0ly @Polymarket @PolymarketDevs @SuhailKakar

English
0
0
0
45
ago
ago@Flaianovive·
@cafreiman Science and technology made milk affordable, not markets
English
1
0
4
260
Skely
Skely@123skely·
Best trading group chat composition: 90% racists-skizos. 5% quants. 5% idea guys. 0% women.
English
13
6
220
14.3K
HydraDom
HydraDom@Hydra_Dom·
@finn_hulse Horrible take Google can have all of my information and optimize my life for me
English
0
0
0
60
Finn Hulse
Finn Hulse@finn_hulse·
i would rather kill myself than let my girl see me using google maps
English
5
0
27
2.3K
HydraDom
HydraDom@Hydra_Dom·
@mattkalish It’s pretty clear that you’re right the issue is that once they get those 2-3 years under themselves and build a better user experience and build better liquidity, then what? How would a sportsbook compete then except on niche tickets if anything
English
0
0
0
676
Matt Kalish
Matt Kalish@mattkalish·
Idk what people are smoking, there’s not a single exchange product experience for normal people that is remotely close to the delivering the caliber of experience that regulated sportsbooks do. They are 2-3 years of development away (before regulatory touches the product at all)
English
67
10
181
245K
HydraDom
HydraDom@Hydra_Dom·
@TimTheMM I’ve learned to sniff out retardation but lack the why? The buzzwords are the first clue but what is he saying that is truly retarded?
English
0
0
1
377
Tim
Tim@TimTheMM·
this is what the spx dealer gamma bros have created absolutely heinous levels of mental retardation here
English
13
2
111
16.7K