
Malkster1
7.6K posts

Malkster1
@Malkster11
Naval Officer living in a world that continues to surprise.




We are making important and necessary changes to the initial training our officers receive This is about making sure they are ready for warfighting — the fundamental objective of the Royal Navy









You are a fantastic commentator who invariably hits the nail on the head, but the idea of combining all three UK services into a single entity would not work. You would end up with admirals leading Armoured Brigades. And colonels manning submarines. Both a recipe for disaster. Defence has become much more technical since the end of the Cold War and we need specialists with focused expertise across naval, land, and air domains.






The Iranian ship will not be where it was if we had not invited it to talk part in our Milan exercise. We were the hosts. I am told that as per protocol for this exercise ships cannot carry any ammunition. It was defenceless. The Iranian naval personnel had paraded before our president . The attack by the US submarine was premeditated as the US was aware of the Iranian ship’s presence in the exercise to which the US navy was invited but withdrew from participation at the last minute, presumably with this operation in mind. The US has ignored India’s sensitivities as the ship was in these waters because of India’s invitation. We are far from politically or militarily responsible for the US attack. Our“responsibility” is at a moral and human plane. A word of condolence by the Indian Navy ( after political clearance) at the loss of lives of those who were our invitees and saluted our president would be in order.







JUST IN — 🇺🇸🇬🇧 Marco Rubio : We have stopped sharing much of the intelligence with the British government because we no longer find them trustworthy.












