Hunter Boy

@cozwva Does this make sense to prioritise this when people in locations are swimming in sewage and drinking contaminated water?

THE government says it is set to construct nine interchanges in Harare at an estimated cost of US$250 million, with work on the first project at the intersection of Harare Drive and Airport Road already underway.

The Damsel puts everyone in Distress It's amazing how the male species get excited when a beautiful chick passes by.

@RoselineKace 🤣🤣🤣 Amazing poultry behavior indeed.

@dominictsz Great innovation coupled with financial support.

🇨🇳China tackled its waste problem by building over 1,000 waste-to-energy plants, using a 150-year-old technology on a massive scale. Now, some cities even import trash to keep the system running. Turning pollution into power has become a global model!

@advocatemahere @mamakaCleo 😁😁😁

🔸You get given an overpriced multi-million dollar contract to renovate hospital facilities without going to tender. You pack the hospital facilities with a swimming pool, tennis court and all sorts of uselessness while the hospital lacks basic equipment, medication and nurses are underpaid. Pedzezvo you dish out tumahamper twehupfu and food relief, expecting us to clap for you. You then cartoon the staff by making them dance for crumbs like toddlers. It’s an arrogant looting enterprise and we will not see it any other way. Shameless. We need new leaders.🇿🇼

@daddyhope This was long overdue. Beside the 67 farms we have 840 black owned farms stollen during the chaotic land reform program which must be returned. Then the looted goods & infrastructure on all farms. It's a fraud for tax payers who didn't get the land to finance such compensation

People are misunderstanding this issue completely. Zimbabwe is not reversing the entire land reform programme. These are specific farms protected under Bilateral Investment Promotion and Protection Agreements, BIPPAs, signed between Zimbabwe and foreign countries. Many of these farms were bought after independence, not during colonial rule, and their expropriation violated legally binding agreements that Zimbabwe itself had signed. What happened in 2000 was chaotic, violent, and deeply political. Mugabe had just lost the constitutional referendum in 2000 and his grip on power had weakened significantly. ZANUPF was facing growing opposition from a restless population, particularly people who supported the party and were angry that they still did not have land 20 years after independence. To regain political control, Mugabe latched onto the land issue and unleashed a fast-track land reform programme that was often violent and lawless. The tragedy is that while the principle of land reform itself was necessary because of colonial land imbalances, the implementation became corrupted. Productive farms were handed to political cronies, chefs, military elites, judges, and connected individuals, many of whom could not farm. Some received multiple farms while genuinely capable black farmers were sidelined. Even today, some of that land is being rented back to white commercial farmers because the beneficiaries failed to utilise it productively. Zimbabwe’s agriculture has never fully recovered from that chaos. The country destroyed an advanced agricultural system without putting in place a competent replacement system based on productivity, financing, skills, irrigation, and accountability. You cannot build agricultural success by simply handing land to politically connected people who have no farming capacity. So what the government is doing now is not a reversal of land reform. It is trying to correct a legal and economic mess it created 26 years ago by violating its own laws and international agreements. It was criminal for the Zimbabwean government to sign BIPPAs and then ignore them when it became politically convenient. The important question now is not whether the farms are being returned. The important question is who currently holds those farms, whether they were being used productively, and what happens going forward. I can guarantee you that many of those farms were not being fully utilised anyway. Land must be in the hands of people who can actually produce. That is why I always say to countries considering land reform that land cannot simply be taken and distributed randomly. Even in precolonial African kingdoms, land belonged to the king and was allocated to people who could use it productively. You did not automatically get land simply because you belonged to the kingdom. I always use my own example. I was the third biggest Boer goat breeder in Zimbabwe, operating from just two acres at my ancestral village, yet producing far more than all Zimbabwean farmers sitting on massive commercial farms except for only two. Had I been given access to proper farming land, which I would have bought, I would probably have become the number one goat breeder in Zimbabwe. But that opportunity never came because productive land was often allocated to the wrong people for political patronage rather than agricultural competence. Robert Mugabe and ZANUPF’s chaotic and violent land reform programme was not really designed to build a productive Zimbabwean agricultural society. It became a political patronage system. Of course, some ordinary Zimbabweans benefited from the land redistribution, but the system was structured in such a way that land ownership often depended on political loyalty to ZANUPF. If you spoke against the government, you risked losing that land. Many black Zimbabweans have lost farms over the years simply because they fell out of political favour. That alone tells you that this was never truly about empowering citizens equally under the law. It became a tool of political control. And as we saw during the divorce case involving Mugabe’s daughter, she was given 21 farms. One person with 21 farms in a country where millions were supposedly land hungry tells you everything about how chaotic, corrupt, and mismanaged the entire programme became. Land reform was supposed to correct colonial imbalances and create productive black commercial farmers. Instead, in many cases, productive land was captured by politically connected elites, multiple farm owners, and people without farming expertise, while genuinely capable farmers struggled to access land. The current leadership in Zimbabwe, the President, the Vice Presidents, and many men and women of the old guard will not be in power in ten to twenty years’ time. They will all be gone. A new generation will eventually take over, and a lot more will be done to restructure Zimbabwe’s agriculture and bring back sanity, productivity, professionalism, and proper land utilisation. No country can build a strong agricultural sector on political patronage, chaos, and fear. Eventually, competence and productivity will have to matter more than political connections. It is embarrassing that with all that productive commercial farming land not being put to proper use, Zimbabwe now has to import maize from South Africa. That alone tells you how badly the agricultural sector was damaged. And unfortunately, the Zimbabwean example is now making many South Africans fearful of land reform because they look across the border and see collapse instead of increased productivity. But Zimbabwe should never be used as the standard example of proper land reform because what happened there was not a properly planned agricultural transformation programme. It became a violent, chaotic, and corrupt political project driven largely by patronage and power retention rather than long-term agricultural productivity and economic sustainability. Real land reform should increase production, strengthen food security, empower capable farmers, and grow the economy. It should not destroy a country’s ability to feed itself. Zimbabwe has capable black farmers, those are the ones that should have been given access to land not these grifters who are renting out famers and running protection rackets.

Juat After Heavy Rainfal In Vryburg, North West 💔

Grandma’s plate was the sacrifice 😭

🇲🇿 AFRICA IS RISING 🚨 Mozambique just dropped a bold new Mining Law: • State gets minimum 15% stake in ALL mining projects • Total ban on exporting raw minerals — process them locally! • 10% of revenues for community development Parliament debating it TODAY. No more looting our resources while we stay poor. This is how you build real sovereignty. Who’s next? Ghana? Tanzania? Nigeria?

@SajeniMapuranga @LynneStactia @BlessedGeza @Jamwanda2 @mawarirej @Julius_S_Malema @SABCNews @MorningLiveSABC Cde, theft of other people's property which they paid is not a revolution but thuggery. The tax payer can't finance those who are benefiting in this crime. So the 67 farms, 840 black owned farms stollen must be returned. Improvements on all farms must be paid by occupants.

The Land Was Never a Programme It Was the Revolution Itself. Reports that Zimbabwe will return 67 farms to European nationals are not merely a policy reversal. They are a repudiation of what this nation's liberation war was fought to achieve. I have kept my silence on many things. I have watched, and I have waited, and I have given the benefit of the doubt where I could. But this I cannot ignore. This I will not ignore. Reports are now circulating and no official voice in Harare has moved to deny them that the government of Mnangagwa intends to return 67 farms seized from European nationals under Zimbabwe's land reform programme. The reason given is the familiar one to repair ties with Western nations and to unlock debt relief after more than two decades of economic isolation. I understand the weight of debt. I understand the pressure of isolation. I spent my career serving a country that was sanctioned, vilified, and economically strangled by those same Western capitals. I know what that costs a nation and its people. But what is being proposed here is not a pragmatic concession. It is a surrender of the foundational principle upon which this Republic was built. "We did not carry weapons into the bush so that sixty years later a Zimbabwean president would hand back the land to the people we went to war to reclaim it from." Let us be precise about what the land reform programme was, and what it was not. It was not a government scheme. It was not a development initiative. It was not a poverty alleviation programme, though it served those ends. The land was the central grievance of the liberation war. It was the reason our mothers sent their sons into the bush. It was the reason those sons did not come back. When the Lancaster House Agreement was signed in 1979, the question of land was deferred suppressed under the weight of political compromise. For twenty years, Zimbabwe watched white commercial farmers retain vast fertile acreages while black Zimbabweans worked as labourers on land their grandfathers had been removed from by colonial force. The land redistribution that began formally in 2000 was not a whim. It was a reckoning that had been delayed for two decades too long. To reverse that now to hand those farms back to European nationals in exchange for Western goodwill and debt relief is to concede that the original seizure was wrong. It is to accept the Western narrative that the land reform was theft, rather than restitution. That is not a trade I believe this country should be willing to make. Not at any price. "You cannot mortgage the revolution. Once you sell it, there is nothing left to govern in the name of." I do not raise this matter in isolation. Those who have followed my previous writing will know that I have been deeply troubled by the trajectory of this government over recent years. I raised my voice when Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3 was introduced a bill designed to extend one man's hold on power beyond the limits the people themselves enshrined in the 2013 Constitution. I was told that CAB3 was about stability. I was told it was about continuity of vision. I was told to trust the process. Now I am being asked to accept that the land the one irreversible achievement of the liberation struggle is being quietly reversed, also in the name of pragmatism. These are not unrelated events. They form a pattern. And the pattern is this: the principles of the liberation majority rule, land sovereignty, constitutional fidelity are being traded away one by one, not in broad daylight where the people can debate them, but through quiet executive decisions made in the corridors of power and presented as faits accomplis.

No thinking person can fail to recognise this truth. To overlook it requires a deliberate dimming of one’s own sight — or the comfort of rewards that make blindness profitable. #DrG #ConstitutionalFidelity #BoughtToBeBlind #AmendmentBill3

@jahman_adamski The current legal situation highlights a critical gap between his "street-smart" operational style& the formal legal compliance required to protect large-scale assets. His lack of institutional foresight has left his wealth vulnerable to aggressive judicial interventions.

🚨‼️ BREAKING The recent court documents reveal that the legal situation has reached a critical boiling point. Wicknell Chivayo has officially filed an Urgent Court Application in the High Court of Zimbabwe to dismiss the claim of a marriage existence, which he states is the foundation of the freezing of his assets. The application admits that the anti-dissipation order issued by the South African High Court is having a devastating impact on his operations The order has "crippled" his entities, leaving them unable to pay basic daily operations, including salaries, rent, and taxes. The documents confirm that a private jet owned by his companies has been grounded as part of the South African court order. Chivayo claims the freeze makes it "impossible" to pay his court-ordered monthly financial obligations for his children, placing him at risk of falling in contempt of court. Wicknell is asking the Zimbabwean court to dismiss the respondent's claims as "frivolous and vexatious". By doing this, he hopes to remove the legal "predicate" that the South African courts used to freeze his accounts. This urgent filing proves that the Financial Intelligence Centre (FIC) report leaked by @ZimLive isn't just "noise"—it is the source of the pressure. The fact that he is filing this today, May 6, 2026, shows that he is desperate to regain access to his funds before his businesses—and his reputation—collapse entirely.

Let’s just assume The VP either does not now endorse The presidency of ED or he just doesn’t like him now,he doesn’t wear that scarf yekwa ndunge

@Savheya_Happie His tenure as VP has failed to deliver promised reforms. We relies on these same citizens for a record US$2.75 billion in remittances projected in2026. We have created a cycle where we denounces the exodus of professionals while their foreign currency stabilize a fragile economy

VP Chiwenga is very correct , all those who went to Diaspora, they are somehow slaves especially those who went to middle east countries 🙃 Modern day slavery. We need to improve our country instead of running away 😕

Respect people at every level.. you never know when tables turn. life can go from 0-100 really fast and vice versa push out your ego and stay humble you don't know who's gonna help you in the future when the table turns.

@ProfJNMoyo The arguments provided tandamount to a "constitutional coup" and a fundamental conflict of interest. Using past electoral instability as a pretext for a direct beneficiary to change the constitution is a manipulation of democratic norms to entrench personal power & corruption

BEYOND THE FIVE-YEAR HORIZON: RETHINKING ZIMBABWE’S ELECTORAL CYCLE by Karabo Ngoepe, iol.co.za "Zimbabwe’s current debate around constitutional reform, particularly the proposal to move toward a seven-year parliamentary presidency under Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3 (CA3), is not emerging in a vacuum. It is rooted in a long and often turbulent electoral history, where cycles of contestation, instability, and economic disruption have shaped the country’s political trajectory". iol.co.za/sundayindepend…

The Justice Uchena Commission of Inquiry into the Matter of Sale of State Land in and Around Urban Areas Since 2005 summary presentation has been released and its findings are shocking! The report is yet to be released after a court ordered its immediate release. The summary presentation says the Zimbabwean State lost almost US$3 billion through unpaid intrinsic land value, with the exact prejudice put at US$2,977,072,819 according to the report. The twenty two page summary also says many people were settled on urban state land without basic services like clean water, sewer systems and roads. Some houses were built on wetlands, under power lines, over sewer lines, and on land meant for schools, clinics and public facilities. The summary also points to political abuse, land barons, illegal sales of state land, weak government controls, poor record keeping, undervaluation of land, corruption, and politically connected individuals using names of top ruling party leaders to influence government processes. Another major hazardous issue is the public health risk. Pit latrines were built close to water sources, creating a danger of underground water pollution and outbreaks of cholera and typhoid. The summary shows massive corruption, political interference, institutional failure, illegal land sales, poor urban planning, and a huge financial loss to the State and people of Zimbabwe. It took a High Court application and years of pressure before President Emmerson Mnangagwa was ordered to release the Uchena Report into the looting of state land. It is yet to be released. The fact that citizens had to go to court to force the publication of a report commissioned by the President himself says everything about how politically sensitive the findings were. Please find the twenty two page summary via my Telegram link👉🏿 t.me/informationhub…

@CrimeWatchZW @JayJayTeamTruth The brain drain of these so called educated technicians remains a "ticking time bomb". Unless government prioritises a decent living wage&restores hospital resources rather than simply "criminalising" the exit—the exodus of professionals will continue despite the "red list" bans

WATCH | VP Chiwenga strongly criticises foreign recruitment, saying it is worsening brain drain and putting more pressure on Zimbabwe’s struggling health sector.

This might be the first robbery I actually want to succeed 😭🙂 hahahaha

@snowballOfficia A "normal person" might oppose #CAB3 not because they oppose stability. China's success is a product of internal discipline, hard on corruption and innovation, whereas #CAB3 appears to change legal rules without the accompanying industrial and anti-corruption performance.

Upon my arrival in China, I have learned their governance system. In 2018, China amended its constitution to remove the two‑term limit for the presidency. This means the presidency no longer has a maximum number of terms. I don’t know why any normal person can oppose #CAB3?