Simphiwe S. Ntshingila

@ThembaSizani @Sentletse The people whom are given flats don’t have land. The EFF doesn’t have land.

@NtshingilaSS @Sentletse We have land ufuna ukuthini?

No party does more for South Africans than the EFF

@KastroSol @EdibleBloke @MlulamiTeddy @Enghumbhini I'm not thinking. There are court judgments supporting this. I don't just say things based on feeling. Check Economic Freedom Fighters v Speaker of the National Assembly and Others… Democratic Alliance v Minister of Finance… Economic Freedom Fighters v Minister of Finance

@NtshingilaSS @EdibleBloke @MlulamiTeddy @Enghumbhini Imagine thinking a person who’s friends with Generals and Cartels members 😫😂

The shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth in that party once the name of the MP is mentioned.

@EdibleBloke @MlulamiTeddy @Enghumbhini For the reasons I gave you, whether you like it or not he is important to YOU. His victories affect your wallet, your vote, your voice regardless of whether you acknowledge it or not.

@NtshingilaSS @MlulamiTeddy @Enghumbhini Lol, I don't 'think' he isn't important to me, I KNOW that he's not important to me 🙃

@BloseNombulelo @011Shiesty No she could focus her energy on helping the EFF’s calls for historical student debt to be scrapped instead of calling for the party’s death.

@011Shiesty Madness! So you want her to vote for EFF for personal gain? That's what's wrong with you. You only think about yourselves.

Looooooooooooooooooool it makes sense now. You've been beating on EFF hoping patriots and Mashaba would pay your fees. But it is EFF who has been fighting against withholding academic results. See how hating the EFF is really hating policies that would save you

@ThembaSizani @Sentletse Who has land??

@Sentletse There’s land why should people be given flats 😡

@Hector26009 @Sentletse Demand that work from the people YOU voted for.

@Sentletse So when people say they want work , you give them house's? We want work that is stollen by foreigners so we can build house's we want , we don't want house's but work and small business and capital

@EdibleBloke @MlulamiTeddy @Enghumbhini Imagine thinking a person who won cases holding a president accountable for corruption, declaring unilateral VAT hikes unconstitutional, challenging fuel levy increases, and defending political expression from hate speech labels, is not important to you when these things affect u

@MlulamiTeddy @NtshingilaSS @Enghumbhini You're correct. He's important, he's just not important to me the same way milk is important but NOT IMPORTANT to people who don't consume dairy. It's called AUTONOMY 🙃

@EdibleBloke @Enghumbhini 🥂

@NtshingilaSS @Enghumbhini Lol, not even yazi. Izimpawo nje, Julius is not that important to me as a person or politician 🤷‍♂️

@EdibleBloke @Enghumbhini 😂 You want it to be him.

@Enghumbhini I have a feeling that it's Julius but we shall wait and see.

@SiyabongaM_RSA @LeviKriel You can’t engage and persuade fools mahn. It’s just a waste of time. These people have made up their minds

@LeviKriel That how u view the situation right now then what stopping leaders on engaging the masses and persuade them rather then insulting. I’m against insulting the people just because u differ with them. We need leaders who understand the power of persuasion.

When these fools are done marching they will still vote for the ANC because they think immigration is controlled by Julius Malema. Thats how foolish they are 🤣🤣🤣

ASTON VILLA HAVE WON THE EUROPA LEAGUE!!!!! 🏆

@BKganya68300 @Sentletse Nah people just choose to focus on what they disagree with him on.

@Sentletse Your leader fails to articulate these positions. He opens his mouth and what comes out leaves a lot to be desired.

No party works for South Africans like the EFF

A few months back, I published this guide on how to remember everything you read. Re-sharing it here for anyone who finds these protocols useful. (1/11)

I don't think we appreciate Pedro's enough just for R500 you get this..... 🔥🔥

@Ndlovu318Themba @LungsJaca You are correct. We are very scared of Orbit Collage. They play like PSG and can easily give us 10.

@LungsJaca It's called the Durban city effect It brought them down to earth and they don't want to jinx it.

😂🤣 This new thing from Buccaneers is dusting me. They are not fighting anyone. They just agree and even justify (with reason) what the people who are rage baiting are saying 😂 I love it 😂🤣

@Ron_YNWA @VillageGuluva You were right. You are still right.

@VillageGuluva I said i have never seen him

You're right, Mofokeng is such a small and unknown player who never signed the autographs. 👍

@Lebogang2022 @tumisole @Julius_S_Malema Too many South African are too stupid, they take lies such people say about him as the truth and spread it. He must litigate until they know not to lie about him.

@tumisole @Julius_S_Malema Julius is slowly becoming a vexatious litigant. You guys need to talk to him, the struggle is bigger than this, the work that needs to be done for the people of South Africa is too much. He must now develop a thick skin and just move on sometimes. No need to fight every battle!

This was earlier and he still got a final order confirmed by the High Court

@MutsongaMavuta1 @MightiJamie I’ll wait even if it’s forever. What I won’t do is degenerate to insults.

@NtshingilaSS @MightiJamie Domkop

It seems everyone is ignoring the elephant in the room‼️ 1. That being the Section89 report does not have errors in law and in addition is an interlocutory report itself. a. Constitutional court chief justice Sandile Ngcobo, justice Thokozile Masipa and Adv Mahlape Sello SC did not make legal, logical or factual errors. Everyone must read the report themselves and triple check. Those are legal minds of the highest pedigree. 2. Interlocutory reports and reviews - Courts have generally not allowed for reviews of interim reports. That’s because it is not a final report, it’s a step in a series of steps. 3. Jacob Zuma was criticised for Stalingrad. A use of legal manoeuvres to simply delay a process to stay in power. The same critics are now eager to support what is in effect a delaying tactic with an inevitable outcome. 4. It is in the exigent public interest to understand, how did $800 000 of American money end up being banked for years in a sofa? Why was Joshua Door banking used? Where did the money come from? Was it gold mafia money, was it cartel money, was it wildlife hunting money? 5. Justice delayed the say is justice denied. A process designed to keep parliament from doing its work ultimately denies the public accountability at a time when they can make informed decisions to bring accountability to the actors implicated by voting. This is what the constitutional court emphasised.

@SizweLo No politician in power can uplift the poor if we follow this argument. Don't confuse being of the poor with fighting for the poor. Leadership needs access to power, which brings comfort. A deliberately poor leader lacks resources, networks, and security to challenge the system.

During the Frank Dialogue Roundtable discussion with Prof JJ Tabane 2 days ago, Julius Malema fielded a bad-faith question from Mike Sham, a known reactionary agitator, who accuses the EFF of being "committed to killing farmers". Malema responded eloquently, making two critical points: 1. There is no such policy in the EFF. 2. The "Kill the Boer" chant is a struggle song and was never meant to be taken literally. The Constitutional Court and lower courts have affirmed this. But then, Malema doesn't stop talking, and this is where it falls apart. Instead of being brief, Malema moves to reassure Sham that he's not interested in killing anyone because he (Malema) is just like White people: "If you want to kill a farmer, start with me. I've got more cows than you. And more cows than many Whites. So don't think when we talk farmer, we talk White person. So you want to kill a farmer, start with me. The EFF will have to start with me. I'm a farmer myself. And therefore, why would I want to kill myself? Why would I want to commit suicide?" This is a rhetorical tool that Malema uses frequently, as we saw in the now-infamous interview with Jacaranda FM in 2014 (x.com/SizweLo/status…). Now, there's a common understanding by those in the know that the rich and powerful have more in common with each other than they do with ordinary people. In the context of political leaders, powerful people like Malema have more in common with the oppressor than with the people they purport to lead. This is just the nature of class relations. It appears that Malema doesn't want to miss an opportunity to remind White people of this. Once again, in this segment, we see a leader who champions the majority Black poor and marginalised, yet uses his own elite socio-economic status as a shield. The problem with this is that when Malema flexes his asset wealth to argue that he couldn't possibly support killing farmers because he himself is a major farmer, he is affirming his solidarity with the upper class. In case anyone thinks I'm stretching this, consider that by bragging about his massive cattle ownership, Malema is placing himself on the same side of the fence as the wealthy White landowners he frequently castigates. He is saying, "Don't worry, I am a member of the landed gentry now too. I have too much capital skin in the game to burn the system down". Malema goes even further when he says, "If I'm going to kill Whites, I will have to start with the friends of my kids..." This exposes the dissonance in his political messaging. When you read this alongside his "more cows than many Whites" flex, you see a masterclass in a political leader speaking out of both sides of his mouth. First, his followers hear a Black leader who refuses to be intimidated by White anxiety. He presents his personal integration into elite spaces, with his children attending elite schools with White friends and his massive farm ownership, as aspirational proof that the historically oppressed can conquer the spaces previously reserved for the White minority. But, second, when you strip away the aggressive posture and look at the actual substance of what he is saying, you see that it is deeply reassuring to the status quo. By invoking his own children's social reality through "the friends of my kids", Malema admits that his daily life is profoundly intertwined with the very demographic his base believes he politically targets. He is weaponising his elitist proximity to White people to neutralise accusations of radical intent. He is saying to what he frequently refers to as "Whiteness": "Relax. I am a wealthy father with capital assets and deep social ties inside your world. I am not a threat to your lives or your system because my own family's comfortable existence depends on the stability of this exact societal fabric". My point is that to maintain political power, Malema must continue to do two things: On one hand, he must continuously stoke radical, anti-systemic rhetoric. But then, on the other hand, to maintain his material status as part of the country's ultra-elite, he cannot afford to actually break the system. He can talk about it for sure, but that's a different thing altogether. So, by constantly reminding White people of his cows, his life in the suburbs, his farming prowess, and his children's White friends, he is working hard to balance on a tightrope by convincing the poor he is going to war for them, while reassuring the wealthy that he is far too heavily invested in the bourgeois lifestyle to ever pull that trigger. A majestic win-win for the CIC.

@SizweLo Che Guevara was a doctor, not a patient. Engels owned factories. Having wealth or privilege doesn't invalidate fighting for the oppressed. Malema can own cows AND lead land reform. The issue is policy, not his bank balance. His wealth rhetoric doesn’t weakens his credibility