PB Man

4.2K posts

PB Man banner
PB Man

PB Man

@PBMan9

Football index trader

London, England Katılım Eylül 2018
133 Takip Edilen3.9K Takipçiler
PB Man
PB Man@PBMan9·
@FIJapaneseMess1 Yeah Caan was right unfortunately. Hopefully he’s not happy about it.
English
1
0
2
0
Songs of the year podcast
Songs of the year podcast@songsoftheyear_·
@PBMan9 Mate can I just say fair play for actually coming out and saying that you have got stuff wrong, to be fair a lot of us have. Caan Berry laughing his cock off right now
English
2
0
1
0
PB Man
PB Man@PBMan9·
That’s actually disgraceful. I was obviously wrong about a lot of stuff. I really hope everybody is ok.
English
5
1
115
0
PB Man
PB Man@PBMan9·
One thing I have learned is I’m very comfortable with losing my own money but I feel sick at the thought of my enthusiasm/optimism for something having a negative impact on others. Again hopefully nobody is overextended.
English
7
0
46
0
PB Man retweetledi
Rubeus Hagrid
Rubeus Hagrid@proff_hagrid·
I'm in the market for a dragon egg, anyone know where I can get hooked up?
English
3
3
14
0
PB Man
PB Man@PBMan9·
@Jonatha68610525 Agreed. It’s not on they didn’t fulfil their promise to pay them out until the end of the season at all.
English
0
0
3
0
Mr Market
Mr Market@MrMarketFI·
@PBMan9 Yes it's the case. They haven't added 30 days recently it has always been there. They should remove or extend the time limit of that clause to regain confidence.
English
1
0
2
0
Mr Market
Mr Market@MrMarketFI·
The big issue of the IPD removal by #footballindex is not the loss of IPD. This will be replaced with something. The value lost is much bigger than IPD's ever provided. FI has shown they're willing to enforce the 30 day rule in their T&C's. That's a huge loss of value. ❤️+🚀
English
6
4
19
0
PB Man
PB Man@PBMan9·
@Jonatha68610525 Is that the case? Regardless the ability to change bets has always been in the ts&cs it was just immediate before. They actually added the 30 days because Akash thought traders would like it (yes they year are a joke)
English
1
0
0
0
Mr Market
Mr Market@MrMarketFI·
@PBMan9 Not true. The 30 day rule applies specifically to negatively impacting people's bets. It's the first time they have envoked it with specific reference to 30 days. They can announce positive changes without any notice.
English
1
0
0
0
PB Man
PB Man@PBMan9·
@FTI_emperor @Jonatha68610525 For instant sell/lack of liquidity I think UKGC are chasing issues. Only reason I can think of why they wouldn’t be putting walls in.
English
0
0
1
0
PB Man
PB Man@PBMan9·
@FTI_emperor @Jonatha68610525 Yes fair points regarding media opening up and matrix (although they increased divs to compensate both). Adding value to other players doesn’t remove value from a bet in terms of payouts so would dispute that point. They can’t increase divs unless they have the money set aside.
English
1
0
1
0
PB Man
PB Man@PBMan9·
@indexshutch7 @FootballIndex The instigator is ipd>commission and prices not looking like rising to sustainable levels. Plenty of other traders who have looked at the figures came to the same conclusion not surprising FI did too. Let’s see if they come up with a suitable replacement.
English
0
0
0
0
Sam
Sam@indexshutch7·
@PBMan9 @FootballIndex Are u not one of the main instigators behind all this chap? Sure you got the ball rolling.
English
1
0
0
0
Allen Cooper
Allen Cooper@FootieIndexAl·
Agreed. Bought a few goalkeepers recently and many of them now have no sell price. May be the right move but as PB Man says, all players to be given added value elsewhere.
PB Man@PBMan9

It's very delicate situation FI have put themselves in, no idea why they didn't announce the changes immediately. They absolutely cannot screw over anyone's holds. To have a football stock market Goalscorers need to be some of the highest dividend earners, nonsensical otherwise.

English
2
0
6
0
PB Man
PB Man@PBMan9·
@GingerPirlo_FI @ifoundthates @FootieIndexAl SMDP if done correctly would greatly help cheaper players. Not sure how they help strikers without changing the matrix to make it more suitable for that kind of payout. I hope they’ve thought this through properly.
English
0
0
3
0
PB Man
PB Man@PBMan9·
@GingerPirlo_FI @ifoundthates @FootieIndexAl FI should want as many players as possible to be tradeable. PB currently too random for the value to be reflected in prices and see significant trading under this system. In their interests to make sure players aren’t harmed.
English
1
0
2
0
PB Man
PB Man@PBMan9·
@ifoundthates @FootieIndexAl Baffling they didn’t announce the replacement! Might well be that the players people are selling gain the most. In fact I think that’s most likely.
English
5
0
7
0
Jay 🌻
Jay 🌻@ifoundthates·
@FootieIndexAl It’s plausible the replacement for keeper div anyhow is more valuable than the IPD it replaces. Of course, it’s also possible it isn’t 😂😂
English
2
0
2
0
PB Man
PB Man@PBMan9·
So I hope this is much, much better planned than what we have seen over the last 12 months.
English
1
0
13
0
PB Man
PB Man@PBMan9·
It's very delicate situation FI have put themselves in, no idea why they didn't announce the changes immediately. They absolutely cannot screw over anyone's holds. To have a football stock market Goalscorers need to be some of the highest dividend earners, nonsensical otherwise.
English
4
0
29
0
PB Man
PB Man@PBMan9·
@fozziebear_fi @FootballIndex You can't have a football stock market where goalscorers don't win a significant chunk of the dividends. I'm sure they are aware of that.
English
1
0
1
0
Fozziebear
Fozziebear@fozziebear_27·
@PBMan9 @FootballIndex I won’t sell. See what they do. Failing that I’ve just got to hope Michael Antonio scores 20 g/a in the next 6 games I guess...
English
1
0
1
0