P

@Catos_cat @not_our_guy @CBHeresy No.

@not_our_guy @CBHeresy The Church of England. He is ordained.

If I wanted your opinion, foreigner, I’d ask for it in a birthday message.

Christian political tent big enough to include every random internet hitlerian skitzo and sex pest comedian but not big enough to include your lifelong faithful Christian boomer parents because they happen to think it would be wrong to nuke Tel Aviv.

The "new christian right" conference headlined by jewish speaker who "believes in God but not organized religion"

@Lexy_Sauve Key Lime

“I don’t care what happens to my body after I die. Do whatever you want.” While I sorta-kinda-but-don’t-really get the sentiment of this idea, it’s not a Christian way of thinking about the body or your legacy. Joseph wanted his bones settled in the Promise Land.

@SophiscNews @not_our_guy Glad you shared this too. The hypocrisy is palpable.

@not_our_guy This is even funnier

Listen I'm not gonna dox anyone here but if you know you know and this is hilarious

@HilaireNereus Is this not the most effeminate backpedaling ever?

Jolly Brawler ruthlessly takes out one of his own by accident.

@JohnPittmanHey @not_our_guy The apostles were talking about eternity not “in this world” according to “DefiantBaptist”. The chief prerequisite for being a manly Christian is to know all Westeros trivia and video game slang. Keep up.

@not_our_guy Since Jesus was in the game and was put to death, why did the apostles and Martyrs denounce the rulers as murderers, wicked men, and traitors? Is it because they hadn't been schooled by Game of Thrones?

I mean come on he was in the game

@beh2jam @not_our_guy @DefiantBaptist This doesn’t apply at all. Just = “fair, right, or morally correct”. How can it be morally wrong in eternity but correct “in this world”? Morality does not work like that. Would you be willing to say Jesus execution was just because it was “in this world” following the law?

@not_our_guy @DefiantBaptist

In the context of eternity, yes. In the context of this world, no. I explained my position fully and didn't stutter. I'm sorry not sorry that you suck at understanding proper categories. I can't help you.

@nateking5oh @BayouKirkman @not_our_guy If you want evidence of what these people consider “slander”, look at HHC’s most recent heavily evidenced article. You’ll see that these accusations of slander are hollow and worthlessy and should be disregarded.

@BayouKirkman @not_our_guy Has he actually slandered a specific person? I'm new to this whole thing & still trying to learn who to trust. If you have specific evidence of slander, that would be very helpful for me.

You are being played, goy

@nateking5oh @BayouKirkman @not_our_guy He has slandered no one, and despite the womanly hysterics of the other guy, no evidence will be provided of such slander. HHC calls out, with evidence, men who affirm the sinful hatred of these men, thus they feel obligated to defend them by actually slandering HHC.

@Ben_Dennis_ @not_our_guy >No counter evidence >Resorts to medieval violence (pure LARP) Genuinely retarded

@not_our_guy @PI097856 "Debate me bro". I have repeatedly told you that at your request we can make the square and let God settle it with finality.

@AngloEight @not_our_guy Perhaps God does not allow us to hate because we cannot, in our current state, hate with perfect hatred, a hatred that does not involve sin. God alone seems to be able to do so. Thus, we obey the command to love and do not go further than what we have been commanded.

@not_our_guy There's no ambiguity about God's will for you to appeal to. God say that He hates the wicked (Psa 5:5). You say Christ's command to love enemies forbids me hating anyone, even the wicked, & that simultaneous love/hate isn't possible. So God commands me to love people He doesn't.

@NathanBozeman2 @OpStCyprian @iam_shwa …? The length of punishment doesn’t have to be infinite because the sufferer is a being of infinite dignity, thus making His suffering of infinite worth. PSA is perfectly fine with this.

@OpStCyprian @iam_shwa This is like when hell debates happen and both sides go, "Well, if PSA is true, how can ECT/CI be correct? Jesus wasn't eternally tormented or annihilated." They're both correct. It is their affirmation of PSA that is the true problem.

Sedevacantism is retarded

@ptomer Only malakoi here is the guy who won’t say what he means with his chest. Be a man. Say it.

Eli McGowan really is the malakoi boi of the year. Would be great if our churches and government gave the malakoi what they ought to get.

@benny_bangbang @paleochristcon @Pastor_Gabe @Rach4Patriarchy He was “trolling” him, which anyone who has watched him expected. Regenerate conduct is Andrew’s forte.

@paleochristcon @Pastor_Gabe @Rach4Patriarchy yo @paleochristcon you forgot to reply. big fan. just not familiar if you've done what this guy's asking

Does anyone know if there’s video of Andrew @paleochristcon or Rachel Wilson @Rach4Patriarchy sharing the gospel? With the people they debate against? Or with Joe Rogan or something like that?

@I_Choose_Wisdom @SlowToWrite No, there is no bigger problem in the world than sinners stubbornly rejecting salvation. In fact, it’s the only eternal problem in the end. All others will perish in eternity, wars and rumors of war, but that one problem is eternal.

@SlowToWrite The world has FAR bigger problems than whether Jews become Christians.

God, please save Ben Shapiro’s soul.

@megbasham @SophiscNews @BMcGrewvy You’ve already said you don’t watch his videos, so this might be pointless, but did you see his response video to James Talarico? His video arguing accepting homosexuality is a first rank issue, i.e., heresy? Disagreeing on days of creation is not enough for “progressive”.

OK, let me be clear, I have found him a dishonest personality and someone who will try to accommodate progressivism or treat with kid gloves while being disdainful and deceitful about those he considers fundamentalists. So if I know someone does not handle truth carefully in one area, why am I going to listen to them in another? No, thank you, I’m not interested in him.

Can anyone recommend a Protestant podcaster who offers an apologia of our theology against Catholic theology who is a clear creationist—six days, global flood? I know there are some who do this who are local flood, symbolic creation type of people and I’m not interested in them. If it’s someone, for example, who would promote Biologos and Francis Collins or work with Biologos, I don’t want that guy. Is there anyone like this?

For when one says, “I follow Paul,” and another, “Over time, it happened that Thomas's auctoritas became supreme in my intellectual experience,” are you not being merely carnal?