T. Przeczek🛸(✸,✸)

1.1K posts

T. Przeczek🛸(✸,✸) banner
T. Przeczek🛸(✸,✸)

T. Przeczek🛸(✸,✸)

@PrzeczekT

BTC

Gdansk, Poland Katılım Mayıs 2016
1.5K Takip Edilen220 Takipçiler
T. Przeczek🛸(✸,✸) retweetledi
vijn
vijn@vijn_crypto·
I’m earning +4-5% per day with almost zero risk on Polymarket And this strategy is stupidly simple I only trade markets that meet these strict filters: > Probability >95% > Spread <5¢ > Liquidity >$10k > Ends in <1 day I also exclude sports and crypto events because they can still reverse even at 97-99% This leaves me with high-certainty setups where I can safely grab 4-5% in 24h or less My filters are listed below ⬇️
vijn tweet media
vijn@vijn_crypto

This trader turned $700 into $6,000 with just ONE trade And that looks really strange Here’s what makes it suspicious: He has only 23 trades total on Polymarket His biggest win came from the market "Gemini 3.5 released by May 31?" He aggressively Yes bought at just 7.9 cents per share, now it’s trading at 92 cents I’m starting to track this wallet closely with Parity Terminal so I don’t miss his next move

English
36
21
269
40.2K
T. Przeczek🛸(✸,✸) retweetledi
T. Przeczek🛸(✸,✸) retweetledi
Oracle Boar
Oracle Boar@bored2boar·
🚨 FOR $POLY AIRDROP FARMERS Nobody is talking about how airdrop should actually be structured. Here is my honest take and why it matters for every active Polymarket user right now: The platforms that got airdrops right, had one thing in common. (Hyperliquid for example) They rewarded real usage. Not farming behavior designed specifically to game the criteria. Here is what a fair $POLY distribution should look like in my opinion: Core criteria should be three things only. Total volume traded. Total trade count. Number of days active on the platform. These three metrics together accurately reflect a genuine long-term Polymarket user. Hard to fake. Hard to game quickly. Directly tied to what the platform is actually built for. LP farming and market sponsorships should be multipliers on top of the base allocation. Not core criteria. Something like 1.2x or 1.3x for consistent LP providers. The platform is a prediction market, not a liquidity farming protocol. Making LP a core criteria incentivizes behavior that has nothing to do with the actual product. Plenty of LP farmers already made serious money from daily rewards anyway. The allocation percentage matters too. 20% minimum with no vesting would send a clear signal that Polymarket is serious about rewarding its community. Hyperliquid did this and the token pumped hard because holders trusted the distribution was genuine. $POLY has the same potential if the structure is clean and user-first. Drag it out with vesting schedules and complex criteria and the narrative shifts fast. Ship it clean. Reward real users. Watch the token react the same way HYPE did. The formula is not complicated, just requires the right priorities. What you think about this airdrop structure? Full guide on how to farm it right is quoted below.
Oracle Boar@bored2boar

x.com/i/article/2040…

English
28
5
121
14.5K
T. Przeczek🛸(✸,✸)
T. Przeczek🛸(✸,✸)@PrzeczekT·
@ArmadaCR Generálové se fotí u předraženého šrotu a vojáci si musí kupovat trenky a batohy v decathlonu. ... To je dnešní AČR
Čeština
1
0
0
62
Armáda ČR
Armáda ČR@ArmadaCR·
Jednou provždy: tanky nejsou stroje minulosti a nepatří do starého železa. Naopak. Zvyšují bojovou hodnotu každé armády. Odstrašují protivníka. Jejich ochrana, palebná síla, mobilita a význam na bojišti z nich dělají nepostradatelné stroje současnosti. Zajímá vás více? Sledujte nás. Začíná tankový týden.
Čeština
33
13
222
10K
T. Przeczek🛸(✸,✸) retweetledi
Hombre Imparable
Hombre Imparable@Hombrelmparable·
Probablemente la he visto más de 100 veces y el final todavía me mata cada vez 😂😅
Español
1.1K
8.6K
120K
4.2M
T. Przeczek🛸(✸,✸) retweetledi
Didi
Didi@DidiTrading·
Day 501: $POLY is coming sooner than most people think. This will likely be one of the biggest airdrops ever, and it’s honestly not that hard to become a top wallet. > $3000+ profit → TOP 1.23% > $300K all-time volume → TOP 1.73% > $100 in LP rewards → TOP 0.29% If you haven’t yet, I would focus on reaching $100 in LP rewards. Takes a few days and some skill, but it’s still one of the best R/R plays in crypto right now.
Didi tweet media
English
47
7
283
22.5K
T. Przeczek🛸(✸,✸) retweetledi
Lirratø
Lirratø@itslirrato·
Thread of "risk-free" Polymarkets where you can park your capital right now I handpicked the safest options from arguably the most profitable bond whale on the platform (from least APY to highest):
Lirratø tweet media
English
16
1
126
15K
T. Przeczek🛸(✸,✸) retweetledi
Domer❤️‍🔥
Domer❤️‍🔥@Domahhhh·
The Mis-Anthropic World. A shocking discovery, but scientists now consider it likely: the prediction market Kalshi operates on - and originates from - a totally different planet than our own. In a new research paper published in February's issue of Nature, scientists have announced Planet K. Planet K is invisible to the human eye, and yet it exists close enough to access our world wide web. They've used that access to create a site called Kalshi. Scientists have demonstrated its likely existence through an instrument that detects the radiowaves of a series of inexplicable, unbelievable, and incredibly stupid rule cuck particles colliding with Earth. Some readings of these cuck particles, according to Table 2.8 in the paper, are "off the fucking charts." I reached out to one of the coauthors, and he said to me only one thing, "Listen son, there's no other scientific explanation for all this bullshit." NOW, I should responsibly mention that the other competing theory (one that I don't subscribe to anymore) is that Kalshi is okay with jerking their own customers around with fine print nonsense over and over again, costing their users millions of dollars for no reason, while generating fees in the process. That is possible! But it's not the likely scenario anymore. It's too far-fetched. Why would a company do that over and over again? No, the likely, science-based scenario is that there's a hidden, alien world called Planet K that uses our internet. Time and again, Kalshi has ruled against our perception of reality and in favor of made-up nonsense from their bonkers home world. Let's go over the newest example: The AI company Anthropic bought a Super Bowl ad. Unfortunately, as you'll find out, the ad only airs on Earth. Anthropic's ad buy made major headlines across the world (not only because of the ad itself, but also the content of the ad punches ChatGPT in the face). If you google Anthropic super bowl ad, you will probably get 1000+ news stories about this. In a straight forward, alternative prediction market on the exact same event, the odds of an Anthropic ad went from 60% chance to a high 90s chance that they would advertise in the Super Bowl after the news was released. The odds sit at 99% rn, and there's no hint of drama. In the Kalshi market, Anthropic went from a 60% chance that they would advertise in the Super Bowl to >90% chance after the news...............and then down to sub-10% after Kalshi brought down their Planet K-forged hammer. So, what happened here? (It trades at 16% rn, but we'll get back to that) Strap in for some esoteric, annoying nonsense from another world. Here are the rules under the contract: "If Anthropic airs a qualifying advertisement during the official national 2026 Big Game broadcast, then the market resolves to Yes." OK, perfect, so it's definitely YES! Very straight forward! Wait! But hang on, we're extra diligent and see if the word "qualifying" has a catch. Let's delve into the fine print PDF rules that we're going to download: "The Underlying for this Contract is whether BRAND [Anthropic] purchases and airs an advertisement during the YEAR [2026] Super Bowl broadcast." OK, perfect! It's definitely YES there, too! Anthropic bought and is going to air an advertisement! Straight forward. Thanks Kalshi! But hang on again...if you stopped reading there, you're screwed. Because lurking in the bowels of the fine print (a lengthy PDF) is another rule further defining their term "BRAND" with the following clause: "Parent company advertisements that do not specifically feature or mention BRAND do not qualify." The ad is about Anthropic's AI model Claude, Anthropic's only product-line (or, at least, Claude represents 99.99% of Anthropic's products). The ad does not use Anthropic's logo or use the word Anthropic. It instead talks about Claude, Anthropic's product. Therefore, according to a Kalshi ruling made yesterday afternoon -- in line with the bowels of their fine print -- the ad that will allegedly air (released in full already) will resolve in a NO. You had to have a PhD in Prediction Markets in order to go that far down into the rules looking for 'cucks' and then be able to put 2 and 2 together. [I should mention that your author could see the clarification train coming down the tracks and profited off of it to around $8k, but your author also yelled at them for hours to pause the contract and contain the Chernobyl-esque radioactivity that has now turned into a meltdown event]. So what is the net effect of this? Few bucks lost? Just a small ad market on Kalshi? A dumb and cute rule fight that we can dress up in colorful doll clothes? Nahhhhhhhhhhhhh. This market has seen its volume explode as new player after new player continues to board the roller coaster to hell, sometimes incinerating $10k+ in single clicks. It's a never-ending cycle of money incineration: new players are seeing news stories that Anthropic is advertising in the Super Bowl, clicking onto Kalshi, and buying tons of shares over and over again. Many veteran players, who saw Kalshi's ruling and realizing its a nearly-guaranteed win, are trying to buy as much No as they can, but they can't keep up with the demand. So the price keeps rising. From 6c after the clarification, to 8c, to 10c, to 12, to 14c, to 16c, etc. This market is almost 50% bigger than the rest of their Super Bowl ad markets combined. It's reached $10m in volume, with $2.7m in open interest. And rising. Fees generated are in the hundreds of thousands. Based on the average purchase price of yes shares, it's likely that 'new' traders will lose north of $1m because of this market. Could be $2m by the end. Plus in another sad twist, EVEN IF new players knew that a clarification existed, it's unclear if they would be able to parse Kalshi's vertigo-inducing announcement which they posted in all-caps yesterday underneath the market: "THIS MARKET RESOLVES BASED ON THE PARTICULAR BRAND, COMPANY, PRODUCT OR SERVICE LISTED BEING SPECIFICALLY ADVERTISED. IT DOES NOT RESOLVE BASED ON WHETHER THERE ARE ADVERTISEMENTS FOR BRANDS, COMPANIES, PRODUCTS, OR SERVICES THAT ARE ASSOCIATED WITH, OR OWNED BY, THE TARGETED STRIKE. IT IS TITLED, "WHICH BRANDS WILL ADVERTISE DURING THE BIG GAME?" TO BE CLEAR, IF THE LISTED MARKET IS A PARENT COMPANY (E.G. "ANTHROPIC") AND ONE OF THEIR BRANDS OR PRODUCTS IS IDENTIFIED IN AN OTHERWISE QUALIFYING ADVERTISEMENT (E.G. "CLAUDE"), BUT THE ADVERTISEMENT DOES NOT CONTAIN ANY SPECIFICALLY LISTED STRIKE, THE MARKET WILL RESOLVE TO NO." You can say that the paragraph contains words that are in the english language, but I think that's about it. It's unreadable to a normal person! I can barely understand it, and I know what they're trying to say. But forget all of that. What is the point of all of this?Why does this market exist in the first place at all? Because prediction markets are about predicting the future. Is Anthropic going to advertise in the Super Bowl is a straight forward question!!! And the answer does not need to be that complicated. So when users predict an event like Anthropic advertising in the Super Bowl, and then Anthropic advertises in the Super Bowl, there should be an extremely, extremely, extremely good reason to totally rip asunder that relationship between a market and reality. Was it a good reason? No. Kalshi created a trap market here: Anthropic was unlikely to advertise "Anthropic"! They were always going to advertise their only real product line: Claude! It was a bad strike, exarcebated by the fact that Kalshi was very slow to clarify after the ad came out. So users who didn't understand the fight continued to bet money on yes as it traded in the 60s, 70s, and 80s before the clarification hammer came down and rendered their shares nearly-worthless. And even still, right this second, many traders probably don't know that the clarification exists -- even after it was made! -- because how or why would they know that...? It's a large-scale money incineration event where Kalshi receives fees, and money rolls uphill from noobs to veterans. That is bad on any planet. (In the next post, I'll briefly highlight another few examples of this fine print alternate reality that Kalshi has cultivated.)
Domer❤️‍🔥 tweet mediaDomer❤️‍🔥 tweet mediaDomer❤️‍🔥 tweet mediaDomer❤️‍🔥 tweet media
English
36
14
222
32K
T. Przeczek🛸(✸,✸) retweetledi
Lirratø
Lirratø@itslirrato·
Free money alert on Polymarket 🚨 This market is already resolved with 100% voting NO, claim in 4 hours You can get a guaranteed +0.5% return on ANY SIZE 0.5% in 4h = 1,095% APR
Lirratø tweet media
English
13
1
38
3.5K
Car
Car@CarOnPolymarket·
Meanwhile on Polymarket, there's a big dispute over whether Clavicular is actually expecting a baby. It's at 82% based on this clip
Car tweet media
English
20
6
74
22.5K
T. Przeczek🛸(✸,✸) retweetledi
T. Przeczek🛸(✸,✸) retweetledi
Sid
Sid@Trending_Sid·
@amtvmedia 🚨 Oh my god. They really just staged a shooting so Trump can get his ballroom. Overheard- When a clown walks into the White Castle 🏰 he doesn’t become a king but entire White Castle turns into circus 🎪 Few things never change
Sid@Trending_Sid

@RShivshankar 🚨 So how are they going to explain the security failure of an armed person getting past what is supposed to be one of the best security team in the world?🌎

English
10
19
97
43.7K
T. Przeczek🛸(✸,✸) retweetledi
Cameron Heinz
Cameron Heinz@itsCameronHeinz·
It seems Car is trying to Manipulate this market while simultaneously buying the other side he is arguing against on an alt-account. Not a good look 😬 Take the loss and move on.
Cameron Heinz tweet media
English
4
3
52
5K
T. Przeczek🛸(✸,✸) retweetledi
PolymarketHistory
PolymarketHistory@PolymarketStory·
SUSPICIOUS WALLETS 🚨 8 fresh Polymarket accounts just place over $100,000 combined that MegaETH will launch by April 30 Brand new wallets First bet ever Potential profit: $150,000+
PolymarketHistory tweet media
rb (prediction arc)@rb_tweets

.@megaETH TGE in 2 weeks??? 7 fresh polymarket accounts bought 100k shares on Megaeth token launch by April 30. pumping the price from 9c to 53c in a matter of few days (profile links below)

English
20
2
85
38.1K
T. Przeczek🛸(✸,✸) retweetledi
karcharodon
karcharodon@kar4arodon·
Polymarket airdrop is coming? $POLY I'm ready, my stats: > joined march 2023 > 192 predictions > all-time pnl $4246.83 > total volume $625,328 > sponsored 8 markets > tipped 3 traders > earned holding yield( 4% APR) > earned trading fee rebate > earned more than $40 daily rewards(LP) > merged > split > 1 referral > holding positions more that 2 months > more that 10 categories traded Are you ready?
karcharodon@kar4arodon

Do you think I'm eligible for the $POLY airdrop?

English
30
4
98
19.6K
T. Przeczek🛸(✸,✸) retweetledi
Papo Econômico
Papo Econômico@opapoeconomico·
Você alavanca 10x achando que vai ficar rico mais rápido. Matematicamente, está fazendo o oposto. Em 1956, um engenheiro da Bell Labs chamado John Kelly Jr. resolveu um problema que ninguém tinha formalizado: qual é o tamanho ÓTIMO de uma aposta? A resposta mudou cassinos, hedge funds e mercados de previsão. 🧵
Papo Econômico tweet media
Português
61
491
3.9K
772.3K
T. Przeczek🛸(✸,✸) retweetledi
Yarchi
Yarchi@undefinedKi·
Found a wallet that belongs to someone on the polymarket team Profile link > #mlyqlj1" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">polymarket.com/profile/0xd4aa… He buys shares at 0 cents in any size and just prints risk-free This is the real alpha But seriously i have no idea what this is Never seen anything like it Probably just a bug Any ideas?
English
36
2
64
18.3K
Sonix
Sonix@sonixtrader·
Manchester City vs. Arsenal is going to be INSANE! I have 500$ on Arsenal, not winning. What about you? Market - #0jTKjYL" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">polymarket.com/event/epl-mac-…
Sonix tweet media
English
4
0
25
1.4K
T. Przeczek🛸(✸,✸) retweetledi
Yarchi
Yarchi@undefinedKi·
You've been trading a Polymarket that doesn't exist. LMSR was retired. If you're still pricing trades with bonding curve math, you're solving last year's exam. Polymarket runs on CLOB. Off-chain matching, on-chain settlement. Price is not calculated by a formula. Price is what sits between best bid and best ask. Slippage is how deep the book is at each level. Read depth before you click. A market at 0.45 with $200 stacked on the ask is not the same market as 0.45 with $20. Same price, different beast. Limit orders earn, market orders pay. Every market buy you place funds someone else's edge. Takers cross the spread and pay fees. Makers sit in the book and collect. Maker quotes near midpoint on eligible markets also earn LP rewards. That program only exists because CLOB needs makers. Quick example. Bid 0.42, ask 0.45, you think fair is 0.48. A market buy crosses the ask and shrinks your edge immediately. A limit at 0.43 might wait, but if it fills you got in under midpoint and earned rewards while waiting. Stop reading LMSR threads. Start reading the book. Save it.
Yarchi tweet media
English
17
2
48
2K