Psychological Spite

4.4K posts

Psychological Spite banner
Psychological Spite

Psychological Spite

@Psycho_spite

Couldn't afford to give a fuck if it was financed

Katılım Ağustos 2022
767 Takip Edilen363 Takipçiler
Psychological Spite
Psychological Spite@Psycho_spite·
@camhigby Is it too much to ask for the police to something more persuasive against these turds
English
0
0
2
66
Cam Higby 🇺🇸
Cam Higby 🇺🇸@camhigby·
🚨 Massive amounts of teargas and flashbacks deployed by NJ state police as chaos continues outside Newark ICE facility
English
37
119
565
12.7K
Iris Seraphina 
Iris Seraphina @iris_seraphina·
$300 solid carbide cutter gets away from the CNC!! 😳
English
37
89
1.6K
181.7K
Amalgamyte 🐺♨️
Amalgamyte 🐺♨️@Amalgamyte_VT·
Suicidal empathy. If everyone presses the blue button, everyone survives. Versus taking the chance that by pressing the red, you were the one that tipped the favor, and all the blue button pushers die. You would survive no matter what by pressing red, but would you be able to carry the guilt of mass murder for the rest of your life? Even if 1% of the global population pressed blue, that's still a lot of people dead, partially by your own hand
vittorio@IterIntellectus

why would anyone even press blue?!?

English
447
27
607
48.8K
Ken
Ken@Sir_Kentine·
@lporiginalg Low IQ rightoids who have recently woken up to taking your own side now thinking that "taking your own side" means total unabated selfishness in all situations imaginable. If you were married with children you would know the obvious choice is blue.
English
1
0
3
179
Traddoc (Tdoc)
Traddoc (Tdoc)@Jclearfield2·
Ok, I'm convinced. I want someone like @MrBeast to do this experiment in one of his competitions for like 5 million bucks. If you hit red you stay in, if you hit blue you only stay if half the people also pick blue. What do people do with real stakes on the line beyond virtue signaling for the internet?
Covfefe Anon@CovfefeAnon

This twitter classic "red button / blue button" [everyone who picks blue dies unless more than 50% do; everyone who picks red lives] question is cursed but we've learned a lot about people since it went around on the timeline the last time First to get this out of the way - there is zero actual reason to push blue - none - there is no "payoff to cooperation" being modeled since the payoff on offer - not dying - is the same for both choices. The only rational reason to pick blue is that you *hope* less than 50% of people pick blue so you can end your life and escape the person who is putting you in contrived hypotheticals for his own amusement With that out of the way - what we've learned in the 2 years since this hit the timeline the first time is that many, many people are simply next token predictors and when they see this example they say they will pick the "cooperative" choice (which isn't actually that!) We have also learned that when confronted with the stupidity of this position, they will simply costlessly double down and "argue" about it forever rather than admit error Really, the question is extremely revealing

English
96
8
230
30.8K
Psychological Spite
Psychological Spite@Psycho_spite·
@elramith @timsoret We survived as a society because natural selection exists. Society collapses when there are too many stupid people making stupid decisions.
English
0
0
0
12
Elramith
Elramith@elramith·
@timsoret Red and blue are two paths in the woods, red is safe, blue has a tiger. If enough people coordinate they can kill the tiger, and blue will be accessible again, protecting any child or elderly who might wander down it. We survived as a species by picking blue.
English
1
0
0
431
Tim Soret
Tim Soret@timsoret·
Assuming no possible coordination: If everybody was rational, we would all individually pick red & be safe without needing coordination, trusting that the sum of individual interests would lead to the most optimized outcome. Except that many humans are irrational & dogmatic, and driven by idealistic / empathetic concerns, would pick blue, even if that requires coordination which is not guaranteed & which puts them as risk. Knowing this, even if you’re initially inclined to vote red, the actual moral choice, to avoid the death of those willingly putting their lives at risk, is to vote blue to maximize the chances of saving everybody. In short, if you know that others are not perfectly rational agents, to save them you have to go along with their irrationality, which is counter intuitive.
Tim Urban@waitbutwhy

Everyone in the world has to take a private vote by pressing a red or blue button. If more than 50% of people press the blue button, everyone survives. If less than 50% of people press the blue button, only people who pressed the red button survive. Which button would you press?

English
506
50
1.1K
91.3K
The Fat Electrician
The Fat Electrician@Fat_Electrician·
This is fascinating. Logically the answer is red button: If you push the red button, you survive guaranteed. That applies to everyone. Just press red and go home, everyone lives, the end. The only reason you’d press the blue button is: A. You’re a fucking moron. B. You want to die. C. You’re willing to risk your life to save A&B from the consequences of their own decisions. It’s the perfect embodiment of the mentality that society constantly needs to deprioritize itself to cater to the lowest common denominator. To save them from themselves. Now the question is: is that suicidal empathy that will bring about the end of society, or is it a remarkable display of humanity that sets us apart from the rest of the animal kingdom?
Tim Urban@waitbutwhy

Everyone in the world has to take a private vote by pressing a red or blue button. If more than 50% of people press the blue button, everyone survives. If less than 50% of people press the blue button, only people who pressed the red button survive. Which button would you press?

English
302
344
5.1K
200.9K
Psychological Spite
Psychological Spite@Psycho_spite·
Not at, pressing red does nothing to anyone. By pressing blue you decided to gamble that your decision wont end you. You making a bad choice and then convincing enough people to join your bad choice so you wont have to face the consequences is a dick move. If you really care about people you encourage and help them to make good choices.
English
1
1
1
39
Jenni
Jenni@hashjenni·
I'm BEGGING women to PLEASE be careful around any man who's defending Donald Trump. You are not safe with them.
English
3.5K
6.5K
50.7K
767.6K
Harry Sisson
Harry Sisson@harryjsisson·
So Trump basically gave Iran everything they wanted and we got the Strait of Hormuz opening… which was already open before the war started. ART OF THE DEAL EVERYONE!
English
1.1K
3.4K
29.6K
494.1K
Psychological Spite
Psychological Spite@Psycho_spite·
@0hour1 I wonder which country would really hate to not see get attacked. Its so strange they would suddenly get attacked after Iran agreed to a cease fire...... Maybe the ceasefire wasnt real, maybe it was and someone didnt want it to be. Who really knows...
English
0
0
4
950
Jake Shields
Jake Shields@jakeshieldsajj·
I'm very thankful is ending the war but we attacked Iran unprovoked just to end up worse off
English
170
132
1.8K
34.1K
Retard Finder
Retard Finder@IfindRetards·
Why are the retards angry that Trump negotiated a 2 week ceasefire?
English
1.1K
240
7.9K
196.6K
Liam Nissan™
Liam Nissan™@theliamnissan·
🎶Guess who's back Back again Nissan's back Tell your friends
English
2.6K
3.7K
35K
355.1K
Psychological Spite
Psychological Spite@Psycho_spite·
@JesseBWatters Seems awfully convenient that after a cease fire happens with Iran, something that would make a certain country upset, suddenly that certain country is "attacked"..... Im sure its just a coincidence....
English
0
0
29
3.4K
Jesse Watters
Jesse Watters@JesseBWatters·
🚨 HOLY SMOKES: MISSILES ARE RAINING DOWN TEL-AVIV… LESS THAN TWO HOURS AFTER THE CEASEFIRE AGREEMENT 🚨
English
5.8K
8.7K
54.5K
8.3M
Jay Bee
Jay Bee@TheJayBee·
A easy tutorial on how to remove the membrane off your ribs before cooking.
English
46
5
73
7.1K