Raphael Cordeiro
744 posts

Raphael Cordeiro
@RCordeiro_Trade
Community Strategy Lead @ M7 | Fintech Growth Specialist | Crypto Analyst | Trader



When tracking the institutional adoption of digital assets, it is easy to lose sight of the true scale of the global market. The logarithmic radar chart we made reveals exactly where we stand today in the transition to an onchain economy. The inner ring represents the current market cap of tokenized Real-World Assets (RWAs). The outer ring? The total global market cap of those exact same asset classes in the legacy economy. Here is what the data actually tells us about the current state of the market: 1. Fiat Currencies: A $100 Trillion global footprint, yet only $160 Billion currently runs onchain via stablecoins. 2. Sovereign Debt: A $100 Trillion market, with a mere $11.5 Billion tokenized to date. 3. Equities & Real Estate: Combined, residential real estate and global stocks represent $395 Trillion in traditional wealth. Their onchain penetration today? A near-invisible fraction at $1.5 Billion and $150 Million, respectively. At M7, we don't view the massive void between these two rings as empty space. It represents the largest Total Addressable Market (TAM) expansion in the history of capital markets. The sandbox phase is over. As we have covered over the last few weeks with moves from @EuroclearGroup, @Mastercard, and ICE, legacy infrastructure is no longer fighting decentralized rails; they are actively absorbing them. Traditional finance has recognized that onchain capital efficiency, instant T+0 settlement, and 24/7 liquidity are fundamentally superior to siloed legacy systems. The race is no longer about building the base infrastructure rails. The challenge now is to leverage this new interoperability to capture migrating institutional liquidity, seamlessly merging TradFi and DeFi. As we are saying; Market structure doesn't evolve by arguing with the past. It evolves by building a superior future that makes the old ways simply obsolete. Let’s accelerate outcomes.

The $7.3B Agentic AI Market Just Hit an Inflection Point. But Infrastructure, Not Agents, Will Decide the Winners It’s a market structure shift, exactly like the ones we’ve seen before in finance. Here are 5 historical analogs that show precisely how these transitions play out and who captures the real value. 1. Telegraph → Telephone (1844–1920) Real-time communication replaced mail-based banking. Winners: Western Union, AT&T, and the exchanges. Losers: Post Office and local operators. Outcome: Centralized players that owned the communication layer captured the monopoly value. 2. Stock Ticker → Electronic Trading (1887–2006) Open outcry gave way to computerized matching. Winners: Technology providers and the first HFT firms. Losers: Floor traders and traditional brokerages. Outcome: Speed was the initial edge, until regulation and transparency became the new moat. 3. ATM Networks → Branch Banking (1965–2010) 24/7 self-service replaced branch-dependent models. Winners: Banks that invested in infrastructure. Losers: Traditional teller roles (shifted to sales). Outcome: Branches became cost centers instead of revenue centers. 4. Credit Cards → Checks (1950–2000) Paper clearing moved to electronic networks. Winners: Visa and Mastercard duopoly. Losers: Small retailers forced into the system. Outcome: Interchange fees and network effects locked in structural power. 5. Online Banking → Neobanks (1995–2025) Branch-first models lost to digital-first players. Winners: Tech-native fintechs. Losers: Slow-moving incumbents. Outcome: Brazil’s Pix processed 428 billion transactions in 2023 alone, speed and convenience won. The pattern is always the same: Speed creates the first wave → backlash and friction follow → infrastructure + governance win the long game.




















