Re Dit

@WolfFenris6347 @IronTiger44 I made a song for someones birthday with AI. I chose best out of 5. Nit a musician nor a composer nor that slop is copyright able song.

@WolfFenris6347 @IronTiger44 Me choosing a bride dress from a catalog, did not make me a tailor nor a designer. Even if I put keywords in and description You didn't create, you used a machine that created for you. Not that you maybe edited it slightly. You are not an artist nor that work us art then. -

Once again a coward who shut off comments. Again: 1. AI does NOT steal. No part of other people’s art is used in generating new images. It’s literally just noise (static) that is organized pixel by pixel based on the instructions provided by the user. This idiot doesn’t know how this technology works. There are no lawsuits because no one can identify stolen assets. Because assets are not being stolen. 2. This person identifies as an artist? What are they, eight? Why would anyone pay for art like that when they can get their kindergartener to draw that for them? Most of these antis are NOT artists. They do not have the training, background or experience to be selling art. And yet they have ego enough because of toxic positivity that doesn’t push them to grow and develop their skills. 3. Since these Quangos neither understand the technology, nor are they real artists… or at least not good ones… they can STFU about this. No Art Skills Detected/Anti-AI opinion rejected. Seriously look at that drawing. Children draw like that. You don’t get to call yourself an artist, as an adult, if that’s all you’ve got. No one is going to pay for that shit. YOU, Xephy, need to pick up a pencil and learn to draw because you don’t know how. I do. I sell art all the time. I just sold a logo earlier this week, in fact. AI isn’t stopping me. The reason you aren’t selling your art is because it’s crap. That’s a YOU thing. People DO support human artists. When they’re good.

@Fahad_Alharbi69 @TheyNeedRights You could also just not be involved with them.

Maybe stop being obsessed with us/our genitals :P

@davidallen124 @FountainCartoon You can still like a pretty picture made by AI. It's still not art tho. Just generated slop. An immitation of human quality.

@davidallen124 @FountainCartoon Well, as someone with Masters degree where for "what is art" had to read through numerous philosophers and joined psychology and scientific research about brain involving art. Art creation requires feelings and experience. AI lacks that part. It imitates what it was fed.

Yes… because robots are the same as people 🙄

@EsqJersey @shutupari_ @grok Many do look like this at young age. It's normal and looking worse is criticized. Issue is alcoholic men that also beat their wives is very common. And... Many men are expected to be providers. Pretty women are more than husband material men there.

@shutupari_ @grok Because 1. Their economy sucks 2. The majority of women don't look like this, and those who do are moving to the west.

hey @grok , why is the divorce rate in russia so high with women like this !!

@SteketeeSteve @hell_line0 He cheated, woman he cheated with might not have any other relationship tho. So the infedelity is on MN in this situation. He broke the vows

@hell_line0 That's your defense? It's the man's fault? As far as I'm concerned, anyone who cheats on their spouse is scum. So is anyone who has a relationship with someone they know is married or in a committed relationship.

mm where's the husband on this poster? He didn't know he was married...?

@theythemperor @bunyqiu Don't need to hate Christians. There are good and bad people. But the Bible teachings are not exactly innocent. Killing of first born, hardening farao heart on purpose. Killing all living beings etc. Plenty of that stuff

@bunyqiu Mary has no age, the estimated age isnt based on anything in scripture but rather the societal standards at the time "Christians are evil because people were impregnating 12 year olds in bethlehem when jesus was born" Get a better reason to hate christians if ur gonna hate

mind you mary was 12

@flipTasty @IsaacMazzi728 @JamianGerard I do too think it might be possible in far future. But for now AI images are just imitation of sentient beings. It's similar when once they created digital black model that was gorgeous, then people discovered she never existed and felt lied to. The value of that"model"dropped.

@flipTasty @IsaacMazzi728 @JamianGerard Well when that will happen, it will be what we say, alive. And yes it will be art it will consciously create. Animals are sentient beings, we don't know if they have emotions but that part is a fair argument. Ai as is now however, is a machine imitating. Not creating. -

the hypocrisy is baffling

@flipTasty @IsaacMazzi728 @JamianGerard Yep. Ai imitates it, that's why people hate it. Cuz it imitates creativeness by not being one. By not having thought process nor emotions.

@Renaswer @IsaacMazzi728 @JamianGerard What you basicly say and what ibread is even if you can't tell the difference the moment you know its made by a human you can say its creativ

@flipTasty @IsaacMazzi728 @JamianGerard Not art doesn't mean it's ugly. Just that it's a soulless product. Even if it looks pretty. Pretty doesn't make it art eather. Sunset is pretty... It's not art tho. Art of nature maybe, if you believe nature is sentient.

@flipTasty @IsaacMazzi728 @JamianGerard Because art is not just a picture, but execution of the piece. The process is exactly what makes one art and the other a generated image. If I ask AI generate me song about an elephant, will it make me musician or a singer? And that song won't be artistic piece eather. Correct.-

@flipTasty @IsaacMazzi728 @JamianGerard You can see answer to it too, if you read what I wrote. Wrote it all. If you don't read, can't help ya.

@Renaswer @IsaacMazzi728 @JamianGerard If i show you a drawing can you tell me if its art or not without me telling you its made by an artist or an AI ?

@Buhariyyu2 @FountainCartoon Ai can be a tool. Sure I use it to have fun. It doesn't create tho nor does it make art. And wdym it has a thought process? It's a machine. It's programmed. It has no feelings nor will of thought.

@Renaswer @FountainCartoon With your claim I take it you don't even use AI because of how insecure you're of it, wdym AI has no thought process?

@RealSentraAI @KingScarletYGO 🤣 A person who can't articulate a response? What are you even talking about?

@Renaswer @KingScarletYGO Your filled with so much anger. Do you and your husband argue a lot? I hope it isn't physical. Please find joy. There so much positivity in the world. Try to get out of the dark void. God bless you

Ai art isn’t art. Art is expression. Crappy poopoo splatter art is still more qualified to be called art than anything a machine can produce. Because a machine cannot do anything but imitate expression. I’m an art teacher so yes I know more than you, also fuck you

@flipTasty @IsaacMazzi728 @JamianGerard If you read what I said I said. Their images can be pretty, being pretty doesn't make it art. Read better.

@Renaswer @IsaacMazzi728 @JamianGerard So if in 10 year i show your art from an AI and an artist and you can't tell wich is AI and not and accidentaly say the AI art is "beautiful" the exact moment i reveal you its AI you suddently gonna change your first take ?

@Buhariyyu2 @FountainCartoon AI has no thought process. Nor has it feelings character etc. So your claim is in fact invalid.

@Renaswer @FountainCartoon Yeah and ask 3 different AI's to draw an apple and they'll all draw it differently that aligns with their thought process, it's literally same thing, you just hate innovation and feel personally attacked by anything AI, again no disrespect to artists but credits to AI too

@flipTasty @IsaacMazzi728 @JamianGerard If you want to understand what art is. Just take an artist you might like, study their life and journey. Very often their art style and pieces start to make a lot of sense then. That's what makes their creation art and Ai is called soulless slop.

@flipTasty @IsaacMazzi728 @JamianGerard And by copying in all mediums artist could still have his touch and character slip in. It's hard it won't still have his "style" brushtrokes, which already does contribute something new to it. And that makes it debatable. Depeds if artist can execute this consept and deliver it.