sade

4.4K posts

sade

sade

@SaadaAman

WHAT IS THE AGGREGATED AUDITED SHARE COUNT MMTLP!!

Rockville, MD Katılım Kasım 2021
563 Takip Edilen277 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
sade
sade@SaadaAman·
KKep@kimkep4796

$MMAT / $TRCH / $MMTLP 🦋 Case: In re Meta Materials Inc., Bankruptcy Court, District of Nevada DOC: 2806 Date Entered: May 19, 2026 ⚠️ Not Legal Advice What happened in plain English: 🎣 Rule 2004 = Bankruptcy’s “fishing expedition” (yes, the judge basically says that) The judge reiterated what he’s hinted at before: Rule 2004 discovery is VERY broad. Translation: A bankruptcy trustee gets wide latitude to investigate: ✅ what happened to the debtor ✅ possible wrongdoing ✅ transactions involving third parties ✅ whether there are claims worth bringing for the estate This is not normal narrow civil discovery. It’s intentionally broad. ⸻ 📉 Nasdaq’s argument: “This is too burdensome” Nasdaq argued: 🛑 The trustee wants too much data 🛑 It would require custom/expert work 🛑 About 4 years of data is too much 🛑 Producing “order type” information would require creating special work product 🛑 Rule 2004 is being used as a pre-lawsuit litigation weapon ⸻ 👨‍⚖️ Judge’s response: Not buying most of it The judge was blunt. Big takeaway quote: “The court is not persuaded that in modern times, producing roughly fifteen gigabytes of data in spreadsheet form is unduly burdensome for any entity, let alone one as sophisticated as Nasdaq.” That’s a pretty direct rejection. 💥 Translation: “Nasdaq, you’re a major market operator. Don’t tell me 15GB is impossible.” ⸻ 📂 Trustee’s clarification mattered Judge noted trustee said: ❌ She is NOT asking Nasdaq to create a brand new custom “order type” field ✅ She IS asking Nasdaq to produce existing trade data and identify how order type can be determined from existing fields That distinction appears to have helped. ⸻ 🧱 Nasdaq’s Rule 45 procedural argument failed Nasdaq argued the subpoena process was improper. Judge said essentially: ❌ Nope. Nevada bankruptcy local rules explicitly allow Rule 45 subpoenas in this context. So that argument went nowhere. ⸻ 🎯 Standing / scope argument also failed Nasdaq argued: “Third-party stock trades aren’t Meta’s property.” Judge’s answer: The trustee presented evidence Meta was issuing stock during the relevant time. AND… The trustee identified possible estate claims like: 💰 breach of fiduciary duty 💰 unjust enrichment 💰 professional malpractice Meaning: This isn’t just curiosity—it could directly affect the estate. That makes Rule 2004 discovery appropriate. ⸻ 🧠 Pre-litigation concern (Nasdaq had one valid point) The judge acknowledged Nasdaq’s concern: Rule 2004 cannot be abused just to get a free head start in litigation. BUT… He ultimately deferred to the trustee’s business judgment. That’s important. Translation: “Yes, I see the concern—but I’m not stepping in here.” ⸻ 👀 Prior production hurt Nasdaq’s credibility This is a sneaky but important line. Judge notes Nasdaq already produced 6 months of data previously. Translation: “If you already produced similar data, it’s harder to argue further production is impossible.” 💥 That undercuts Nasdaq’s burden argument significantly. ⸻ THE ACTUAL ORDER 📜 NASDAQ MUST PRODUCE BY JUNE 9, 2026 ⏰ Nasdaq must produce transaction data for: ✅ MMAT ✅ TRCH Date range: 📅 September 21, 2020 → August 21, 2024 Including: 📊 RASH data /CORE data 📊 data dictionaries / all orders 📊 executions / cancellations 📊 replacements / order type modifiers 📊 order attributes BUT: ❌ Nasdaq does NOT have to create a custom new “order type” field ⸻ Denied? “All other requests” in the subpoena package were denied w/out prejudice. That means: 🚪 not necessarily dead forever 🚪 trustee may potentially narrow/repackage later ⸻ Practical takeaway 🦋 This is a meaningful trustee win. Nasdaq fought production. Nasdaq lost the core fight. The trustee gets a multi-year transactional dataset—exactly the kind of raw market data that can be used for forensic analysis. The judge imposed guardrails, but the headline is clear: Nasdaq must produce. 📈⚖️🦋

ZXX
0
0
0
5
sade
sade@SaadaAman·
JunkSavvy@JunkSavvy

"WE HAVE IT ALL"... ⁉️Have THEY been here the entire time? ⁉️Did Epstein's purchase of TRCH in 2011-2014 draw THEIR attention??? ⁉️ Was Epstein using TRCH to launder money for child trafficking and political influence??? ⁉️ Did THEY watch as the @SECGov, @FINRA and other regulatory agencies were weaponized against TRCH MMAT MMTLP NBH investors??? ⁉️ Were we just collateral damage in pursuit of THEIR "something bigger"??? ⁉️ How many more retail investors need to be defrauded before THEY put an end to it??? ⁉️For all the #FA, is MMTLP how they #FO??? ⁉️ Do you wonder why the "temperature" has been turned up in the last few weeks??? #Desperate Let them ALL squirm. Every last one of them. Because THEY know everything... THEY CANNOT STOP WHAT IS COMING!!!

ZXX
0
0
0
3
sade
sade@SaadaAman·
Ann Vandersteel™️@annvandersteel

Dear @POTUS @realDonaldTrump Over 100K men and women and military veterans have lost billions in a Wall Street scam of naked short selling #MMTLP. Same thing they did to $DJT You may want to sign a letter floating around your admin instructing the @secgov Chair to give the accurate share count. $NBH is waiting on the number to make the MMTLP shareholders whole. It’s been since 3 1/1 long years. Time to move. Thank you for your attention to this matter.

ZXX
0
6
7
84
sade
sade@SaadaAman·
Ann Vandersteel™️@annvandersteel

Dear @POTUS @realDonaldTrump Over 100K men and women and military veterans have lost billions in a Wall Street scam of naked short selling #MMTLP. Same thing they did to $DJT You may want to sign a letter floating around your admin instructing the @secgov Chair to give the accurate share count. $NBH is waiting on the number to make the MMTLP shareholders whole. It’s been since 3 1/1 long years. Time to move. Thank you for your attention to this matter.

ZXX
0
0
0
18
sade
sade@SaadaAman·
🧬Craig Brockie@CraigBrockie

1 in 10 Americans now has an autoimmune disease. Lupus. Crohn's. Hashimoto's. Type 1 diabetes. Multiple sclerosis. Rheumatoid arthritis. Your doctor will tell you it's genetic. Or bad luck. Or that your immune system just "turned on itself." Harvard researchers disagree. A pediatric gastroenterologist at Mass General (Dr. Alessio Fasano) spent 20 years tracking down the missing piece. What he found changed the conversation. Every autoimmune disease he studied shared the same three ingredients: - A specific environmental trigger - Genetic predisposition - A leaky gut Take any one of those away, and the disease doesn't start. The gut isn't just where food gets digested. It's a one-cell-thick wall - The only thing standing between your bloodstream and everything you eat, drink, and swallow. When that wall is tight, your immune system stays calm. When it's leaky, Undigested food particles and bacterial fragments slip through into your blood. Your immune system sees invaders and attacks. But the particles look a lot like your own tissue. Attack the gluten fragments → attack the thyroid (Hashimoto's) Attack the bacterial fragments → attack the joints (rheumatoid arthritis) Attack them over and over → attack the nerves (MS), the gut (Crohn's), the pancreas (Type 1) This is called molecular mimicry. Here's what people report when they heal the gut wall: Skin clearing up Brain fog clearing up Digestion finally working Joint pain fading within weeks Autoimmune flares slowing down Energy returning after years of fatigue The things that punch holes in the gut wall: Gluten (yes, even if you don't have celiac) Glyphosate on conventional crops NSAIDs (ibuprofen, aspirin) Ultra-processed food Chronic stress Antibiotics Poor sleep None of these are rare. Most people have all seven running on autopilot. I've been saying for 30 years: almost every chronic disease traces back to a broken gut. The science keeps catching up. The good news? Unlike your genes, the gut wall is something you can actually rebuild. Comment RESTORE and I'll send you a free guide on how to heal the gut and calm the immune system naturally. P.S. MUST Follow for me to DM you.

ZXX
0
0
0
6
sade
sade@SaadaAman·
JunkSavvy@JunkSavvy

If there is a winning argument to deny TRANSPARENCY to tens of thousands of defrauded investors, don't you think the best attorneys money can buy would be making it??? They tried, THEY FAILED!!! 1 Down, 4 to go.... #Discovery "And why do they want to know whether our client caused a spike? Because they want to name us as a defendant in the lawsuit." ~Peter Fountain, Counsel for Citadel, VIRTU, Anson Funds NONE of you can stop what is coming... MMAT MMTLP TRCH NBH

ZXX
1
12
13
364