Scott A Boykin

862 posts

Scott A Boykin banner
Scott A Boykin

Scott A Boykin

@ScottABoykin

Katılım Ocak 2026
105 Takip Edilen215 Takipçiler
Angela McArdle
Angela McArdle@RealAngelaMc·
22 bylaws proposals at the Libertarian National Convention. Six scheduled hours of debating bylaws proposals. No interest in advancing Libertarian federal policy.
English
43
11
194
16.6K
Scott A Boykin
Scott A Boykin@ScottABoykin·
@RealAngelaMc The Libertarian Party is about debating rules and platform proposals. It's loaded with people there to strike a pose as a "real libertarian." I'm so glad I left.
English
0
0
1
7
Bryce Jackson
Bryce Jackson@brycejacksoncvt·
MAGA to independents/libertarians: FALL IN LINE OR GET OUT! Independents/libertarians: ok, we’ll vote for someone else or not at all. Also MAGA: nooooooooooooooo you’re helping the Dem’s you asshole 😭
English
95
128
899
13K
Bruce Fenton
Bruce Fenton@brucefenton·
Just unenrolled from the Republican Party. Enjoy the mid terms.
Bruce Fenton tweet media
English
3.7K
1.5K
14.4K
1.1M
America First
America First@Suzette_L·
@brucefenton If democrats win, THERE IS NO COMING BACK. Do you really want to see the country ruined?
English
175
2
8
67.9K
Libertarian Taft
Libertarian Taft@Libertyman24245·
Can we please for the love of god have normal people run the LP, can we just get rid of the left and right faction completely too
English
17
1
36
1.4K
Jason Rink
Jason Rink@JasonRink·
Name this band. Wrong answers only.
Jason Rink tweet media
English
93
4
72
6.8K
Scott A Boykin retweetledi
Stan R. Mitchell
Stan R. Mitchell@StanRMitchell·
If this kind of video is already circulating in May, the campaign ads heading into November are going to be absolutely brutal.
English
323
3K
6.9K
228.8K
Zuzu Petals
Zuzu Petals@ZuzuPetals20·
@ScottABoykin @ML3democrats Really?? Data from 2022-2026 shows a notable trend of voters and some officials moving from the Democratic Party to the Republican Party or unaffiliated status, driven by ideological shifts, frustration with party direction, and local political alignments.
English
1
0
0
6
TheFrenchie
TheFrenchie@ML3democrats·
Are Trump supporters misinformed, ignorant or just plain stupid?
TheFrenchie tweet media
English
5.4K
967
4.3K
125.7K
Scott A Boykin
Scott A Boykin@ScottABoykin·
@MeanwhileInUA No, it was because NATO expansion posed a threat. This is a rehash of the "they hate us for our freedom" garbage line neocons use to clamor for war in the middle east.
English
1
0
0
681
Meanwhile in Ukraine
Meanwhile in Ukraine@MeanwhileInUA·
Putin didn't invade Ukraine because of NATO. He invaded because Ukrainians were proving democracy works. Historian and Pulitzer Prize winner Anne Applebaum puts it plainly: Putin looked at Ukraine's democratic movement and thought, "If they can do it in Ukraine, then people could do it in Russia. So I need to crush this." That's the real threat Ukraine posed. Not missiles. Not borders. A working democracy next door. Applebaum frames the war as a fault line between the democratic and autocratic worlds. Russia isn't just trying to take territory. It's trying to erase Ukraine as a nation, reduce it to a colony, and send a message to every country that the post-1945 rules of Europe no longer apply. Those rules were simple: no invasions, no wars, borders don't change by force. Russia understood exactly what it was breaking when it crossed into Ukraine.
English
1.6K
5.5K
15.4K
494.1K
Richard
Richard@ricwe123·
"We are becoming a country that is so rich, so powerful,with the kind of growth we have now, the debt is very low, relatively speaking, you grow yourself out of that debt"
Richard tweet media
English
21
8
22
1.1K
Scott A Boykin
Scott A Boykin@ScottABoykin·
@raefejenkins Not a political party. The electoral system is designed to defeat third parties, and any mass party will wind up being controlled by big donors and multinational corporate interests.
English
1
0
4
107
NeverWokeX
NeverWokeX@raefejenkins·
Democrats suck Republicans suck So now what?
English
219
23
375
7.9K
Scott A Boykin retweetledi
Joe Kent
Joe Kent@joekent16jan19·
This is why Israel's primary goal prior to the war was to get us onboard. They simply can't fight Iran w/out U.S. combat power. This is also why Israel will spend 100s of millions or more, buying influence in DC, it is a core pillar of their national defense. All of this is well known in DC but not discussed freely.
John Hudson@John_Hudson

As the war drags on, tensions have grown between US and Israeli officials, particularly as Netanyahu exerts pressure for the US to restart the war. “Israel is not capable of fighting and winning wars on its own, but nobody actually knows this, because they never see the back end,” said a US official

English
573
3.8K
15.1K
608.6K
Being Libertarian
Being Libertarian@beinlibertarian·
@harryjsisson It would be cool if yall were interested in holding corrupt Democrats accountable too. Lib Inc is no different than Con Inc
English
11
54
1.8K
10.9K
Harry Sisson
Harry Sisson@harryjsisson·
Can’t wait for Democrats to take back the house so we can Subpoena all of these people in the Trump regime on Epstein, Iran, insider trading, and more. Hope they have good lawyers!
English
668
576
3.9K
62.5K
Axiomatic Enemy of the State
Axiomatic Enemy of the State@DeTocqueville14·
If you didn't vote for the Libertarian Party ticket of Jo Jorgensen & Spike Cohen in the 2020 presidential election then you are a sexist antisemite.
English
33
5
124
1.9K
Scott A Boykin retweetledi
Rudy Havenstein, Senior Markets Commentator.
“This is a completely unconstitutional, illegal, aggressive war. We had no right to start it against a country that we’re in the middle of negotiations with on behalf of a third nation and based on a lie. This is a completely treacherous Pearl Harbor style attack." Great summary from Scott Horton. @scotthortonshow
English
19
129
644
47.9K