Smugler N.o.1
829 posts
Smugler N.o.1 retweetledi
It’s patently absurd that Apple isn’t smart enough to make their own AI, yet is somehow capable of ensuring that OpenAI will protect your security & privacy!
Apple has no clue what’s actually going on once they hand your data over to OpenAI. They’re selling you down the river.
English
Smugler N.o.1 retweetledi
NEW MILESTONE, NEW TICKET GRAB 🎫🪽
We heard you GOATS🐐. It's time to grab 200 Lottery tickets at once 🏆
Increase your Jackpot win rate by reaching the new milestone in "Get more GOATS" journey everyday! 💸📈
💳 Grab new tickets today, the $TON Jackpot awaits: t.me/realgoats_bot
$GOATS $TON
English
@okx @realDogsHouse okx, the FUTURE is CLAYTON. let’s do this.
English
📢 #NewListing
#OKX will list $DOGS @realDogsHouse!
🟢 $DOGS/USDT Spot trading begins at 12:00 PM on August 20th (UTC)
More: bit.ly/3SMwIGi
English
@PrimordialAA Where is the final sybil list fucking asshole?
English
Moving $31m on-chain for near 0 cost? Must be an OFT.
(It is)
English
Several other teams are working towards their own version of the chain-of-chains concept. Below are recent results from an AMM TPS test for ZKsync Era, Polygon zkEVM, and OP Mainnet:
Source: github.com/bogatyy/rollup…
English
The ZK Gateway combines proofs from the ZK chains into a single proof that can verify the entire network on Ethereum. The ZK chain states will also be concatenated, deduplicated, and re-compressed into blobs. This will dramatically reduce the verification costs for all users.
ZK Chains are not required to use the ZK Gateway; they can switch between using the ZK Gateway and directly settling to Ethereum at any time without affecting the security of their chains. But using ZK Gateway is more cost-efficient, thanks to its data compression service.
The ZK Gateway will be operated by a decentralized, trustless set of validators, to ensure resilience and reliability of the network. The participation in this decentralized validation process requires a ERC20 token, designated by ZKsync network governance.
The validators will charge a fee to facilitate bridging, as well as a fee for every byte of state diff data posted to the ZK Gateway. This means that the revenue of the ZK Gateway validators can grow exponentially over time, as more and more of the value transactions move onchain.
English
The new class of blockchain networks is emereging, with @zksync quietly leading the way.
The difference between the "chain-of-chains" vision and the previous generation of rollups is the emphasis on transparent interoperability. These networks are meant to feel like one chain.
ZKsync@zksync
Several other teams are working towards their own version of the chain-of-chains concept. Below are recent results from an AMM TPS test for ZKsync Era, Polygon zkEVM, and OP Mainnet: Source: github.com/bogatyy/rollup…
English
@zkSyncDevs Zk Sync - Zk Shit, move out all my assets of u chain
English
🎉 Node Pruning Arrives on ZKsync 🎉
Introducing periodic data pruning for ZKsync nodes: Configure your node to automatically delete batch data older than a set threshold, optimizing storage without impacting performance.
English
English
Nederlands
English
@mochimongo @LayerZero_Labs Will be roughly 1m ZRO paid out to hunters I believe by final numbers
English
English
@TheNFTMoney Sybil list #3 was not and is not final
English
I swapped all my $ZRO airdrop money into $ZK.
Rekt or moon?
English
@PrimordialAA Hello Bryan
You had several versions of Sybil list In the first version some wallets were unfairly included after your review they excluded from final list Despite being excluded from final version wallets still aint receive ZRO distribution (Not eligible) Could you check issue?
English
I think this + unit bias have been 2 of the most interesting things. Total supply @ 100B and everyone celebrating ;p. The anchoring of the human mind if fascinating
Bryan Pellegrino (臭企鹅)@PrimordialAA
Why is it so hard to get a distribution perfect and what makes @LayerZero_Labs's case so difficult. First is just expectation vs reality. The size of that divide will always directly correlate to the amount of angst in a distribution. The number of people who have said to me. I did 50 transactions, how could I possibly only qualify for 60 ZRO? Reality: 50 transactions is 0.0000375% of overall transactions on LZ. If it was DIRECTLY tied to # of tx and it was a full 15% of overall supply being distributed you would only be eligible for 56.25 ZRO The number of users who did > 50 tx: 957,640 The number who did > 100 tx: 227,410 The number who interacted with 15+ chains: 1,075,590 Think about that, if you did 50 transactions AND hit 15+ chains and we distributed to 1M addresses you would be in the bottom 5% of addresses. Now on top of this you layer in the protocol RFP, 225 protocol submissions which I believe is even more than Arbitrum STIP! A huge amount of developers and protocol built on top of LayerZero. Ultimately devs are the core user of LZ, everyone else is using one of their apps not using LayerZero directly. Every one of these protocols is massively different. What @StargateFinance wants to distribute for is completely different than what @Angle_Finance, @MIM_Spell, @TraderJoe_xyz and @PancakeSwap may want to, which is massively different than what @gh0stlygh0sts @KanpaiPandas @pudgypenguins and @tinydinos_eth may want to. Controlling for this factor is incredibly hard. Do it by $ transferred? All NFTs or anything based on state/data/etc. get completely excluded. Vice versa? The other group is completely excluded. The only normalizing factor here is protocol fees, if everything is an agnostic packet to LayerZero than it should treat it as that. There is a reason sending $5 via an OFT does not cost any more than sending $500,000,000 on LZ if you're interacting directly. The protocol doesn't care what it is, a message is a message. Expand this to 70+ chains and almost 2.5 years of transactions... not easy! Will write up more on this when we have a full day to sit down and do it properly. Back to prepping for tomorrow!
English