....

301 posts

....

....

@Sourlemur

Kingston, Ontario, Canada Katılım Ekim 2014
288 Takip Edilen26 Takipçiler
....
....@Sourlemur·
@JohnCleese I think these folks do this on purpose to increase engagement.
English
0
0
0
2
....
....@Sourlemur·
@tonydunsttv Super interesting read that actually shifted my opinion. Thanks for that.
English
1
0
1
80
TonyDunstTV
TonyDunstTV@tonydunsttv·
I was teaching at a school in Kenya 17 years ago when the head-boy collapsed one day during recess. We couldn’t resuscitate him, so a teacher scooped him up and brought him to his mom’s house…but she refused to take him to a hospital because she couldn’t afford it. The teacher took him, and the doctors said he collapsed from hunger. He’d been barely eating so his mom and sister could have enough to eat. I guess the recent studies say UBI doesn’t impact people much in first world countries. But if they ever wanna spend our tax dollars on places like these, do it.
Rutger Bregman@rcbregman

AMAZING result from a 10-year study: a one-time $1,000 cash transfer to households in rural Kenya cut infant mortality by 48%. One of the biggest gains EVER seen in global health. “The best way to save a child’s life is to give a mother money when she needs it most.”

English
11
1
82
24.1K
Wolvie
Wolvie@wolviebets·
@jaredgriener Did Trump personally write this provision and slip it in the senate bill?
English
3
0
5
1.2K
Jared Griener
Jared Griener@jaredgriener·
Shout out to all the poker players who only voted for Trump because they thought it would benefit them financially 🤡
Phil Galfond@PhilGalfond

Yikes. Senate Amendment to the Big Beautiful Bill = You get taxed on more than you earned from gambling, even if you netted $0 (or less!). Here's how it works and what you can do... The change If it passes in this form, starting in 2026, gambling losses (and expenses) will only be 90% deductible (and still only up to your total winnings). What this means in plain English If you win $100k and lose $100k – You’ll owe tax on $10k of “phantom” income. If you win $100k and lose $50k – You actually profited $50k, but you’ll owe tax on $55k. If you win $100k and lose $150k – No tax owed (your deduction is capped at $100k, which is more than 90% of $150k ($135k)). (Editing in from my post below because it's important: A pro who earns $200k/year might have $3m in winnings and $2.8m in losses. This means earning $200k and being taxed as if they earned $480k.) This applies to both recreational and professional gamblers. For pros, your travel, coaching, software, etc. are lumped into the “loss” bucket and still subject to the 90% cap. What to do Pulling from @russcfox's post: "If you don't like this (and I don't), and if you have a GOP Congressman, let them know. (You can find your House representative at house.gov/representative…) Be respectful in your message, and, yes, they are looked at." Thank you for breaking the news and keeping poker players posted, Russ! --

English
46
64
1.2K
123.8K
....
....@Sourlemur·
@DougPolkVids This bill is going to result in the premature deaths of thousands of folks kicked of Medicaid. Millions of kids will go hungry because of cuts to SNAP. But please, won't someone think of the poor professional poker players? So many Trump voters finding out.
English
1
0
3
153
....
....@Sourlemur·
@SciarappaD61111 @RetroAgent12 Sir, that is not how crime rates work. It isn't that less crimes are committed by the undocumented, it's that the undocumented have lower rates of criminal activity (fewer crimes per person). Hope that clears thing up. Have a great day!
English
0
0
1
24
....
....@Sourlemur·
@CryptoPoor2024 @MaFrt1 @atrupar In case you wanted a serious answer, the Oregon Treaty of 1846 established the 49th parallel as the border from Lake of the Woods (at the Minnesota, Ontario, and Manitoba border) and the Pacific Ocean.
English
0
0
6
105
Aaron Rupar
Aaron Rupar@atrupar·
DOOCY: Are you concerned that if Canada became the 51st state, it would be a very very blue state? TRUMP: You have that artificial line that looks like it was drawn by a ruler. I don't mean a ruler like a king, I mean a ruler like a ruler. It's just an artificial line ... is it liberal? Maybe.
English
1.3K
649
4.8K
1.2M
....
....@Sourlemur·
@atrupar Every time he goes off like this on Canada, it gives Carney a bump in the polls. 2 months ago, the Liberals were dead in the water, CPC majority a lock. Today, it's a horse race. Silver lining to the stupidity.
English
0
0
0
18
Aaron Rupar
Aaron Rupar@atrupar·
Trump: "Canada doesn't pay for military. They give us nothing. And they are the worst people to negotiate with of everybody ... they cheat."
English
3K
1.4K
7.6K
1.7M
Fuji
Fuji@criken14·
@HiddenYorkshire Never read the book so I don’t get the joke. Is this real or no?
English
2
0
0
405
....
....@Sourlemur·
@Evolutionistrue Jerry, I used to devour your blog when I was a grad student. I'm saddened at the direction that you've taken these past few years. So much punching down, in service of....? You really can't see why "sex worker" is an improvement over "whore"? Jesus, man.
English
0
0
0
16
....
....@Sourlemur·
@Jake35919084691 @SonnyBunch But the point is that he agreed to those tariffs. They are part of a trade deal. That he signed. Also, those are over-quota tariffs that are rarely triggered.
English
0
0
0
7
Jake - ジェイコブ
Jake - ジェイコブ@Jake35919084691·
@Sourlemur @SonnyBunch As he says about everything he does. that doesn’t change that I think it’s ridiculous to charge tariffs as high 270% to your Nextdoor neighbor and largest trade partner. I don’t think trumps a genius, at all. I’m sick of the globe looking at America as daddy who’ll pay the bills
English
2
0
0
22
Sonny Bunch
Sonny Bunch@SonnyBunch·
If you support a trade war against Canada on the grounds of stopping the flow of drugs into America you are either one of the stupidest people on the planet or a lying hack. It’s a fascinatingly idiotic argument on virtually every level.
English
97
367
2.9K
94.7K
....
....@Sourlemur·
@woodifitweretru @SonnyBunch But your president is starting a trade war against Canada. The trade war is specifically the policy that Trudeau said was dumb.
English
0
0
0
3
....
....@Sourlemur·
@JFFredrick2 @SonnyBunch Less than 1% of Fentanyl coming into the US comes through the border with Canada.
English
0
0
0
7
JFFredrick
JFFredrick@JFFredrick2·
@SonnyBunch So Canada won't get off it's rear end and stop the drug trafficking? Unless someone forces then to.
English
2
0
1
87
....
....@Sourlemur·
@BJCCrew @SonnyBunch Hi friend. The tariffs you mention are specifically allowed under the current trade agreement, which was negotiated and signed by Trump during his first term. At the time, he called it "one of the greatest deals ever".
English
0
0
0
6
BrewsCrew
BrewsCrew@BJCCrew·
@SonnyBunch Do you support Canada’s tariffs on America that proceeded the current ones? Or are you just a blow hard?
English
1
0
0
21
TR
TR@_LQCincinnatus·
@SonnyBunch agree a trade war is disproportionate but I think it’s a very serious mistake to dismiss the amount of narcotics entering the country thru northern border
English
1
0
0
64
....
....@Sourlemur·
@Jake35919084691 @SonnyBunch Unfortunately Jake, those tariffs are allowed under the current trade agreement between our countries, which was negotiated by the previous Trump admin and signed by him. At the time he called it "one of the greatest trade deals ever".
English
1
0
0
12
Jake - ジェイコブ
Jake - ジェイコブ@Jake35919084691·
@SonnyBunch I can support a match of tariffs that Canada applies to us over the past few decades, or the equivalent of their major exports to us
English
1
0
0
21
....
....@Sourlemur·
@JBradshaw01 I live in a city where Lib won by a huge margin, but I teach in a town where PC got more than half the vote. Rural folks are freaked out by immigration. They are seeing people who look different, and they are scared. I think that's a huge part of why the PCs are hanging on.
English
1
0
0
64
....
....@Sourlemur·
@TomDwan @JDVance I really thought you were smarter than this, Tom. You think Trump doesn't know he's lying about the favorability (and everything else)? He's a liar. He lies. All the time. More verified lies than anyone, ever. What you really mean: "ask him to make his lies less obvious."
English
0
0
0
102
Tom Dwan
Tom Dwan@TomDwan·
@JDVance This is a good tweet. Can you gently nudge trump and others to realize their 4% favorability thing is wrong 🙏🏻🙏🏻. Not saying Zelenskyy is great, sure there’s a buncha nonpublic stuff u guys know… but at least until that comes out he’s a bunch more popular than 4%
English
30
0
42
17.9K
JD Vance
JD Vance@JDVance·
This is moralistic garbage, which is unfortunately the rhetorical currency of the globalists because they have nothing else to say. For three years, President Trump and I have made two simple arguments: first, the war wouldn't have started if President Trump was in office; second, that neither Europe, nor the Biden administration, nor the Ukrainians had any pathway to victory. This was true three years ago, it was true two years ago, it was true last year, and it is true today. And for three years, the concerns of people who were obviously right were ignored. What is Niall's actual plan for Ukraine? Another aid package? Is he aware of the reality on the ground, of the numerical advantage of the Russians, of the depleted stock of the Europeans or their even more depleted industrial base? Instead, he quotes from a book about George HW Bush from a different historical period and a different conflict. That's another currency of these people: reliance on irrelevant history. President Trump is dealing with reality, which means dealing with facts. And here are some facts: Number one, while our Western European allies' security has benefitted greatly from the generosity of the United States, they pursue domestic policies (on migration and censorship) that offend the sensibilities of most Americans and defense policies that assume continued over-reliance. Number two, Russians have a massive numerical advantage in manpower and weapons in Ukraine, and that advantage will persist regardless of further Western aid packages. Again, the aid is *currently* flowing. Number three, the United States retains substantial leverage over both parties to the conflict. Number four, ending the conflict requires talking to the people involved in starting it and maintaining it. Number five, the conflict has placed--and continues to place--stress on tools of American statecraft, from military stockpiles to sanctions (and so much else). We believe the continued conflict is bad for Russia, bad for Ukraine, and bad for Europe. But most importantly, it is bad for the United States. Given the above facts, we must pursue peace, and we must pursue it now. President Trump ran on this, he won on this, and he is right about this. It is lazy, ahistorical nonsense to attack as "appeasement" every acknowledgment that America's interest must account for the realities of the conflict. That interest--not moralisms or historical illiteracy--will guide President Trump's policy in the weeks to come. And thank God for that.
Niall Ferguson@nfergus

"This will not stand. This will not stand, this aggression against Kuwait."--George H.W. Bush on August 5, 1990. Full quote from Jon Meacham's biography. Future history students will be asked why this stopped being the reaction of a Republican president to the invasion of a sovereign state by a dictator.

English
18.8K
30.7K
161.2K
39.6M
.... retweetledi
Cory Doctorow NO LONGER ON TWIT TER
In 2013, Thomas Piketty had an unexpected bestseller (a 750 page economics book translated from French!) *Capital in the 21st Century*. 1/
Cory Doctorow NO LONGER ON TWIT TER tweet media
English
11
258
768
90.9K
....
....@Sourlemur·
@randyshackelfor @RichardDawkins Your tweet is an absolute masterclass in broadcasting your own ignorance, given that Dawkins has long spoken out AGAINST trans folk. Bravo sir.
English
0
0
15
252
Richard Dawkins
Richard Dawkins@RichardDawkins·
America’s elected senators have demonstrated their ignorant contempt for science by confirming an anti-vaccination loonie as Health Secretary.
English
2K
1.2K
9.3K
698.5K