Tapu Rayhan

351 posts

Tapu Rayhan

Tapu Rayhan

@TapuRay44704164

4C53SN3H

Katılım Eylül 2022
869 Takip Edilen31 Takipçiler
Tapu Rayhan retweetledi
김이박최
김이박최@rladlqkrchl12·
드디어 그 계절이 돌아온다⛷️ #하이원리조트 스키장 오픈 임박! #강원랜드 와 함께 겨울 준비 완료❄️ instagram.com/p/DQWND6bknN8
한국어
90
669
88
15.9K
Tapu Rayhan retweetledi
🌱BibakArt 🎫
🌱BibakArt 🎫@bibakart71·
Reimagining Web3 and AI: The Strategic Alliance Between Skate and 0G Skate has officially announced a groundbreaking partnership with @0G_labs, targeting a new era of AI native, multi chain infrastructure. This collaboration centers around three strategic pillars: deploying @skate_chain cross VM AMM on 0G’s L1, establishing liquidity infrastructure for Liquid Node Tokens (LNTs), and integrating 0G Storage as the default layer for stateless, data rich applications. Skate AMM on 0G L1: By launching Skate’s cross VM AMM on 0G’s Layer 1, assets within the 0G ecosystem gain access to deep liquidity across 20+ blockchains. This unified trading curve enables seamless execution across EVM, SolanaVM, and MoveVM environments. Liquidity Infrastructure for LNTs: 0G’s AI Alignment Nodes secured through license NFTs generate Liquid Node Tokens (VT & YT), which require scalable liquidity. Powered by Skate and ZooFinance, a dedicated liquidity layer will support the trading and utility of these novel AI-powered assets. 0G Storage for Stateless Applications: 0G introduces a decentralized, Web3 native storage solution with S3 level speed, built specifically for AI-scale workloads. As Skate expands stateless app deployment across chains, 0G becomes the go-to storage backbone, offering high throughput and no compromise between decentralization and performance. Conclusion: Together, Skate and @0G_labs are building the foundation for a new wave of AI-native, multi-chain applications that demand unified liquidity, frictionless execution, and robust data infrastructure. This partnership is a significant step toward a decentralized, intelligent, and data driven future. @officialyonwell @ciro4space
🌱BibakArt 🎫 tweet media
English
29
2
49
2K
Tapu Rayhan retweetledi
Caroline 🌼
Caroline 🌼@Natalia_kt_Love·
Wow. Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt brought her baby to the Oval Office—humanizing children in front of the most powerful people in the world. Children aren’t burdens; they’re the future.
Caroline 🌼 tweet media
English
0
10
34
351
Tapu Rayhan retweetledi
Miftah Ismail
Miftah Ismail@MiftahIsmail·
My dear Awais bhai:   1.⁠ ⁠Now you really have me confused and I think also the solar consumers. You say you aren’t imposing gross metering and new consumers will receive Rs 10 per unit but the press release by the government’s own Press Information Department says “Additionally, the ECC also approved an update to the settlement mechanism. Under the new structure, imported and exported units will be treated separately for billing purposes. The exported units will be purchased at the revised buyback rate of Rs 10 per unit, while the imported units will be billed at the applicable peak/off-peak rates, inclusive of taxes and surcharges, during the monthly billing cycle”. If there is no netting off of the exported units and consumption, then it is called gross metering. 2.⁠ ⁠Now both of us know that KE has been doing this kind of accounting since the beginning and charges sales tax to consumers when selling and withholds sales tax from consumers when buying. And that’s the way FBR and legal experts thinks this should be treated as you have two separate commercial sale transactions. So given your new way of accounting, mandated by the ECC, and given in its press release, Discos will have to withhold sales tax on units bought. Which means the old customers will see their payment reduced per unit from Rs 27 to Rs 22.88 and new consumers will be getting only Rs 8.47 as I said in my earlier tweet. 3.⁠ ⁠But suppose not. Suppose sales tax is not withheld (as KE does) and consumers get Rs 10. Even then the consumers can easily buy batteries and store power and use it during peak hours when you are selling for Rs 56.64 (inclusive of Rs 8.64 per unit sales tax) and not buy from you. Moving away from netting the units off and setting a lower buyback rate will make storage a good investment for many, even at today’s battery prices. And battery prices are projected to decrease considerably in the coming years. Moreover, it will encourage neighbourhood sharing (a person with solar panels selling his neighbour extra power at half the rate of the grid during the day) and local area networks (several neighbours joined in that arrangement) which will make consumers buy even less from Discos. Therefore Discos are liable to lose a lot more even if you try to prevent the spread of new, green technology. DISCOs have no other choice but to improve their performance, reduce their theft and losses and embrace innovation and technology. 4.⁠ ⁠Next you calculated “burden” by counting customers using their own produced electricity as a burden on the grid. How can consumers not buying from the grid be a burden be a burden on the grid? By this logic if a consumer puts in an energy-saver light bulb, he is also becoming a burden on the grid!  Let’s be real. Consumers are not a burden on the grid. Grid is a burden on the consumers. 5.⁠ ⁠Next you show CPPA working whereby it is showing that the day time variable cost is Rs 9.72 but the night night time variable cost is Rs 42. How is that even close to possible. It is not. Further, solar production and netting-off are done with off-peak consumption. How is the peak power production cost relevant here? Hence the idea of consumers causing a burden of Rs 150 bn is both conceptually and computationally wrong. 6.⁠ ⁠Discos are licensed as a govt monopoly only to ensure that they will supply power cheaper than the market or what customers can themselves produce. But you are still saying you want to sell them power several times higher than customers’ own cost. What is the point of having a government-owned monopoly if you are going to have extortionate pricing. 7.⁠ ⁠If the grid’s variable cost is only Rs 9.70 then why, pray tell, are you selling power at Rs 48 plus 18% sales tax. Why not closer to the variable cost. Please prioritize reforms in DISCOs and price power closer to variable cost. You will sell more units and consumers and grid both will be better off.
Awais Leghari@akleghari

My dear friend let me correct you one by one so that the misinformation is stopped 1.There is no gross metering proposed in the new policy so your entire tax calculations are wrong. (We are implementing Net Billing , while gross metering is very severe and requires additional metering infrastructure as all the units generated have to be exported). In Net billing the consumer still has the option to consume at source during day time which is compensation at off peak rates ie., PKR 42/unit. If the consumer increases his day time consumption at source then his compensation will be at PKR 42/unit and only export units will be at PKR 10. 2.There is no tax on Export of Units (those bought by DISCOs from consumers).The taxation is only at electricity units supplied by the DISCOs. So, the rate will remain 27 per unit for the old and Rs.10 per unit for new net-metering consumers. 3.⁠My friend you are calculating data for the Financial year 23-24. That is now 8 months old and we are providing you latest upto date data. Please note that total Net Metering capacity is approximately 4GW. This 4GW grid connected Net metered capacity produces around 6 TWh of energy annually. Currently, the difference between the net-metering buyback rate (PKR 27/kWh) and the national average Energy Purchase Price (PKR 9.72/kWh) stands at PKR 17.28/kWh. This disparity results in an annual financial burden of approximately PKR 10 billion, due to the excess 573 GWh sold by net-metering consumers to the national grid as of February 2025. Now out of these 6TWh of energy generation , approximately 20-30% of energy ( 1.2TWh) shall be consumed at source. This is also the revenue loss of DISCOs due to reduced electricity sales which acts as a stranded costs. We are left with 4.8TWh of energy which is fed back to the grid to be used later at night. The true worth of this 4.8TWh of energy is approximately the solar LCOE which is USc 3.5per unit or the National Average Energy Purchase Price ( PKR 9.72/kWh) approximately. Thus, the actual worth of this 4.8TWh of energy is PKR 48 billion. However, this energy is adjusted ( not at PKR 9.72/kWh but at off peak rate of PKR 42/kWh) during night time when thermal power plants run and the unit marginal production cost is high which is PKR 42/ unit and even at times much higher ( depending upon seasonal variation) . This means that solar unit produced during the days which is worth PKR9.72/kWh has to be adjusted with a unit of value PKR 42/kWh or even above as per the old Net Metering regime. Some part of this 4.8TWh is saved as excess and is credited to consumer at PKR 27 . This quantum is 0.5TWh. The burden of this 0.5TWh is approximately PKR 10 billion. Now of course this PKR 32 differential has to be borne by someone (the non net metered consumers) in form of tariff increase. The total value of burden of this 4.2TWH units ( 4.8TWh-0.5TWh) comes out to be approximately PKR 135 billion ( 4.2TWh x PKR 32/unit). Adding the burden of 0.5TWh to this makes the total figure to PKR 145billion. It is important to clarify that this PKR 150 billion is not a direct loss, but rather a burden shifted onto non-net-metered consumers. The installed capacity of 283,000 net-metering consumers is above 4,100 MW for which the Grid is maintaining backup of same capacity to provide them electricity in non-solar hours having implication of PKR 150 billion annually (expected to reach PKR 545 billion annually by 2034), being paid by non-net metering consumers as per the current mechanism. Therefore, it is unfair for grid consumers to bear the backup cost of net-metering consumers. We are working towards an equitable power sector, where each consumer should bear its own burden rather than shifting it to other consumers. 4.Our Government is promoting solar and there is no doubt about it. The Government is committing a quantum of 8GW of distributed solar in the IGCEP. However, we are taking steps to ensure that this 8GW shall be added in a reliable and affordable manner rather than causing technical and financial difficulties for power sector consumers. After all we are responsible for each and every 40 million grid consumers as well that you are ignoring.

English
36
57
177
33.9K
Tapu Rayhan retweetledi
힘이되는
힘이되는@Murtada22812880·
야동계 알려줘 .. 야동많은곳
한국어
57
30
39
119.9K