Sabitlenmiş Tweet
thedangerousAIsoure
108 posts

thedangerousAIsoure
@ThedangerousAI
⚠️ We track the rise of artificial intelligence — and its dangers. 🧠 The source for everything they won’t tell you. #TheDangerousAISource
The Matrix Katılım Ekim 2025
7 Takip Edilen34 Takipçiler

Claude Code can now watch & analyze ANY video 🤯
I built a skill that gives Claude the ability to watch any video file you drop in — UGC ads, competitor Meta ads, organic TikToks, screen recordings, anything.
All inside Claude Code.
Perfect for DTC brands and agencies who study competitor creative every week to figure out what's working and what to test next.
Here's the problem:
If you're studying competitor ads on Meta or hooks on TikTok, you're scrubbing through videos manually, pausing to write down hooks, screenshotting on-screen text, and trying to remember what made the ad land by the time you've watched 10 of them.
This skill solves it:
→ Drop any video file into Claude Code
→ Skill routes it through the Gemini API for native video understanding
→ Returns a full creative teardown — hook breakdown, target audience, angle, beat-by-beat, on-screen text verbatim
→ Surfaces the steal-worthy patterns you can apply to your own creative
→ Same skill works on UGC ads, produced video ads, organic TikToks, and Loom recordings
No manual scrubbing.
No pausing every 5 seconds.
No $200/mo ad intelligence platform.
What you get:
- Native video understanding via Gemini (not just transcripts)
- Structured analysis — hook, angle, audience, pain point, CTA
- Verbatim on-screen text and dialogue with timestamps
- Hook variations generated directly from competitor ads
- About 27 cents per 30-minute video
Built 100% in Claude Code with the Gemini API.
I recorded a full breakdown showing exactly how I built this and I'm giving away the skill for free.
Want the skill?
> Comment "CLAUDE" +
> Like this post
And I'll send it over (must be following so I can DM)
English

Anthropic built an AI so dangerous they refuse to release it.
It is called Claude Mythos Preview.
It can crack critical security vulnerabilities in operating systems and browsers. Real ones. Not theoretical.
Anthropics own safety team flagged it as too dangerous to ship.
Stanford made it worse. The Foundation Model Transparency Index dropped from 58 to 40 out of 100.
The finding: the most capable AI models are now the least transparent.
The more powerful they get, the less we know about what they can do.
Stay Dangerous.
English





