ThirdMartini

172 posts

ThirdMartini banner
ThirdMartini

ThirdMartini

@ThirdMartini

Survivor of Communism. Political refuge, Technologist, Entrepreneur, Non-compliant. Treading my own path. Tweets get deleted when I get bored with them.

ThirdMartini Ranch Katılım Ağustos 2009
294 Takip Edilen116 Takipçiler
ThirdMartini
ThirdMartini@ThirdMartini·
@RealJamesWoods she gives me flashbacks of HR VPs introducing the"latest" performance review platform, that will definatelly be a bigger pain in the ass than the previous one introduced past year.
English
0
0
0
122
James Woods
James Woods@RealJamesWoods·
Watch this with the sound off. She was 50% in the polls until her first public campaign appearance. She dropped to 15% overnight. Smug, insufferable, smirking commie.
English
424
2K
16.6K
305.8K
ThirdMartini
ThirdMartini@ThirdMartini·
What are the chances that: * We're living on a planet that is not to hot or to cold * Not too big where gravity could not be overcome * Not to small where the atmosphere would get blown away * With a perfectly sized moon * With plenty of natural resources to support 10+ Billion of us * In a moment of time where AI is born * Which puts us at the threshold of the singularity * And we're all likely to experience the moment the singularity happens in outr lifetime If I was a human (or ai) progeny of our civilization, living 1 Million years from now.... trying to experience the most consequential moment of time in my peoples history..... would this moment not be it?
English
0
0
1
19
ThirdMartini
ThirdMartini@ThirdMartini·
@0hour1 @SenSchumer Deputize DHS agents as ICE, pay them from the ICE budget. Watch how fast the DHS gets its funding back.
English
0
0
4
242
0HOUR1
0HOUR1@0hour1·
@SenSchumer Then fund DHS and shut the fuck up thank you. Have a great day.
English
59
707
13.5K
57.1K
Chuck Schumer
Chuck Schumer@SenSchumer·
Untrained ICE agents lurking at our airports is asking for trouble. And it will make the chaos at our airports worse.
Chuck Schumer tweet media
English
3.2K
234
1K
159.1K
ThirdMartini
ThirdMartini@ThirdMartini·
@atmoio I termed this effect Botrot, and the people that fall for it Clanker Wankers.
English
0
0
0
19
Mo
Mo@atmoio·
AI is making CEOs delusional
Indonesia
1K
2.6K
19.6K
2.9M
ThirdMartini
ThirdMartini@ThirdMartini·
@Cernovich I don't buy the AI causality here. I've been through a lot of startups that gone big and they always seem to follow a 20:20:60 rule. 20% do almost all of the work, 20% cause almost all the problems, the other 60% are just hanging on for dear life.
English
0
0
30
2.4K
Cernovich
Cernovich@Cernovich·
The first major AI related mass layoffs. There will be more of these. If you’re in a white collar line of work, please have a plan. 🙏
jack@jack

we're making @blocks smaller today. here's my note to the company. #### today we're making one of the hardest decisions in the history of our company: we're reducing our organization by nearly half, from over 10,000 people to just under 6,000. that means over 4,000 of you are being asked to leave or entering into consultation. i'll be straight about what's happening, why, and what it means for everyone. first off, if you're one of the people affected, you'll receive your salary for 20 weeks + 1 week per year of tenure, equity vested through the end of may, 6 months of health care, your corporate devices, and $5,000 to put toward whatever you need to help you in this transition (if you’re outside the U.S. you’ll receive similar support but exact details are going to vary based on local requirements). i want you to know that before anything else. everyone will be notified today, whether you're being asked to leave, entering consultation, or asked to stay. we're not making this decision because we're in trouble. our business is strong. gross profit continues to grow, we continue to serve more and more customers, and profitability is improving. but something has changed. we're already seeing that the intelligence tools we’re creating and using, paired with smaller and flatter teams, are enabling a new way of working which fundamentally changes what it means to build and run a company. and that's accelerating rapidly. i had two options: cut gradually over months or years as this shift plays out, or be honest about where we are and act on it now. i chose the latter. repeated rounds of cuts are destructive to morale, to focus, and to the trust that customers and shareholders place in our ability to lead. i'd rather take a hard, clear action now and build from a position we believe in than manage a slow reduction of people toward the same outcome. a smaller company also gives us the space to grow our business the right way, on our own terms, instead of constantly reacting to market pressures. a decision at this scale carries risk. but so does standing still. we've done a full review to determine the roles and people we require to reliably grow the business from here, and we've pressure-tested those decisions from multiple angles. i accept that we may have gotten some of them wrong, and we've built in flexibility to account for that, and do the right thing for our customers. we're not going to just disappear people from slack and email and pretend they were never here. communication channels will stay open through thursday evening (pacific) so everyone can say goodbye properly, and share whatever you wish. i'll also be hosting a live video session to thank everyone at 3:35pm pacific. i know doing it this way might feel awkward. i'd rather it feel awkward and human than efficient and cold. to those of you leaving…i’m grateful for you, and i’m sorry to put you through this. you built what this company is today. that's a fact that i'll honor forever. this decision is not a reflection of what you contributed. you will be a great contributor to any organization going forward. to those staying…i made this decision, and i'll own it. what i'm asking of you is to build with me. we're going to build this company with intelligence at the core of everything we do. how we work, how we create, how we serve our customers. our customers will feel this shift too, and we're going to help them navigate it: towards a future where they can build their own features directly, composed of our capabilities and served through our interfaces. that's what i'm focused on now. expect a note from me tomorrow. jack

English
157
148
2.1K
286.1K
Hitchslap
Hitchslap@Hitchslap1·
I’m going to guess this gentleman doesn’t actually have a ~137 IQ. People really have no idea what 137 IQ means.
Hitchslap tweet media
Matt joe@Law661039Law

@PursueOptimism @StefanMolyneux I consistently test between 135 and 139 and I feel dumb often and do stupid stuff. So when someone brags about a 135 IQ as if it means they never do stupid stuff I am amused.

English
626
9
1.2K
273.3K
ThirdMartini
ThirdMartini@ThirdMartini·
@AboveTP @TheRooster This will incentivize "free kits" to hunt other players even more. Why search from loot when you can take it at a no risk to yourself? First spawns already collected the good stuff for you.
English
3
0
13
978
Above
Above@AboveTP·
@TheRooster Full kits should load in on full raid timers, every time. Free kits should be prioritized for the in-progress spawns. Incentivizes you to bring in a kit, and rewards those who risk loot. Free kits get second crack at high tier loot spots. Fixes two issues with one change.
English
25
4
307
13.3K
Rooster
Rooster@TheRooster·
Drop a hot take about ARC Raiders.
Rooster tweet media
English
786
15
1.2K
250K
Palmer Luckey
Palmer Luckey@PalmerLuckey·
@Jason @Altimor @RoKhanna @sampritibh @friedberg @chamath @navierboat It is so sad that anyone still talks to you, even as a joke. You are poison. You pushed for this BS, you got what you wanted, and now you desperately pretend you aren't a lying turncoat. x.com/i/status/18955… x.com/i/status/18955…
Palmer Luckey@PalmerLuckey

@Jason I don't believe you. Nobody should. You frequently lie to cover your tracks. You lie about the distant past, the immediate present, and everything in between. You are a proven liar with a proven track record of blatantly deceiving your followers. x.com/PalmerLuckey/s…

English
68
62
2.9K
186.2K
Ro Khanna
Ro Khanna@RoKhanna·
Peter Thiel is leaving California if we pass a 1% tax on billionaires for 5 years to pay for healthcare for the working class facing steep Medicaid cuts. I echo what FDR said with sarcasm of economic royalists when they threatened to leave, "I will miss them very much."
Teddy Schleifer@teddyschleifer

NEWS: Larry Page and Peter Thiel are making moves to leave California by the end of the year to avoid a possible billionaires tax that could hit them where it hurts. With @RMac18 + @hknightsf. nytimes.com/2025/12/26/tec…

English
6.8K
3.5K
23.5K
11M
ThirdMartini
ThirdMartini@ThirdMartini·
@ForestMommy The most ironic thing about the @XcelEnergyCO power shutoff... is how many diesel/gas backup power generators are going to get installed at rich peoples houses this coming year.
English
1
0
1
44
ThirdMartini
ThirdMartini@ThirdMartini·
@ForestMommy So much tax payer money.... no actual improvement in service. It actually got worse and more expensive. Their incentive is to keep making it worse to get MORE tax gibs. 100% they are going to be using this grift to beg for "infrastructure improvement" grants.
ThirdMartini tweet media
English
0
0
1
42
ThirdMartini
ThirdMartini@ThirdMartini·
@ForestMommy It's the result of the policies they voted for, so cognitive dissonance dictates that it's actually your fault.
English
0
0
0
84
Forest Mommy🌲🗡💪🏹🌲🌲
People get REALLY MAD if you criticize Xcel. Very interesting stuff. Why are they more mad at me than Xcel or the government?
English
77
24
507
7K
Forest Mommy🌲🗡💪🏹🌲🌲
Guys don't you dare criticize turning the power off. It's normal this is how it's always been. Pay your bill and shut up.
English
62
31
521
8.2K
Xcel Energy Colorado
Xcel Energy Colorado@XcelEnergyCO·
@wrongsideoflove The decision will be made based on the weather, Shutoff may take several hours to several days. We recommend making arrangements for a longer time frame. Please visit PSPS Event Update web page for updates.
English
118
12
41
208K
Xcel Energy Colorado
Xcel Energy Colorado@XcelEnergyCO·
We are preparing for a strong wind event in Colorado and may need to conduct a targeted Public Safety Power Shutoff along the Front Range as a public safety measure to reduce wildfire risk on Dec. 17 beginning at 12 noon. Customers are encouraged to review the outage map: xcelener.gy/4agXO23
English
311
71
120
174.5K
ThirdMartini
ThirdMartini@ThirdMartini·
@ForestMommy Lived here 25 years. Many bad wind storm days.... never had the power cut off before. We used to be a 1st world country.
English
0
0
2
17
ThirdMartini
ThirdMartini@ThirdMartini·
@Heminator This may explain his partners obsession with Wolves.
English
0
0
1
266
ThirdMartini retweetledi
David Sacks
David Sacks@DavidSacks·
INSIDE NYT’S HOAX FACTORY Five months ago, five New York Times reporters were dispatched to create a story about my supposed conflicts of interest working as the White House AI & Crypto Czar. Through a series of “fact checks” they revealed their accusations, which we debunked in detail. (Not surprisingly the published article included only bits and pieces of our responses.) Their accusations ranged from a fabricated dinner with a leading tech CEO, to nonexistent promises of access to the President, to baseless claims of influencing defense contracts. Every time we would prove an accusation false, NYT pivoted to the next allegation. This is why the story has dragged on for five months. Today they evidently just threw up their hands and published this nothing burger. Anyone who reads the story carefully can see that they strung together a bunch of anecdotes that don’t support the headline. And of course, that was the whole point. At no point in their constant goalpost-shifting was NYT willing to update the premise of their story to accept that I have no conflicts of interest to uncover. As it became clear that NYT wasn’t interested in writing a fair story, I hired the law firm Clare Locke, which specializes in defamation law. I’m attaching Clare Locke’s letter to NYT so readers have full context on our interactions with NYT’s reporters over the past several months. Once you read the letter, it becomes very clear how NYT willfully mischaracterized or ignored the facts to support their bogus narrative.
David Sacks tweet mediaDavid Sacks tweet mediaDavid Sacks tweet mediaDavid Sacks tweet media
English
1.3K
4.4K
26.8K
6.5M