Matty

@BrightInsight6 @DrZamilov @JonesDanny Anyone interested in these vases should listen to the historian and expert egyptologist @ralphyellis regarding them! We actually discuss them in great detail at 11:45 and show why the manufactured "fakes" narrative doesn't hold water: youtu.be/-7Z6tG6rXFw

*** Megaliths and Aliens *** Here is a free ranging talk on the Vocation Channel, on everything from megaliths and ancient stone vases, to alien visitations. You name it, we discussed it. Do join in, in the comment section. Either here, or on Youtube. youtu.be/-7Z6tG6rXFw?si… Ralph

@BrightInsight6 @DrZamilov @JonesDanny Anyone interested in these vases should listen to the historian and expert egyptologist @ralphyellis regarding them! We actually discuss them in great detail at 11:45 and show why the manufactured "fakes" narrative doesn't hold water: youtu.be/-7Z6tG6rXFw

@DrZamilov Why hasn’t your work included the fact that there are high-precision Egyptian Vases at the Cairo Museum? Are you going to suggest these are fakes now too? Btw, sharing fake professor daves toxic garbage makes you look unserious, spiteful and petty. Cc: @JonesDanny

If you, like me, have been sold on UnchartedX fairytales, this expose by' Professor Dave' would be a rude awakening. While I strongly dislike Dave's aggressive and deeply disrespectful approach toward those he roasts, he is, factually, spot on. I am still reeling from the fact that virtually everything Ben says is factually inaccurate. Yet he presents it so eloquently that you instantly believe it. This is Ben's greatest talent: storytelling. I only wish he wrote fiction instead - he would have sold a million copies, and I would have bought all his books and had them autographed. Yet realizing that he misleads on purpose is a heavy feeling, the one my heart will take a long time to recover from. I am heartbroken, Ben. I thought you were better than this. youtube.com/watch?v=hSjkba…

The most important public health advice of all time: Do Not Be Afraid.

The Occult History of Atlantis Exposed: Arctic Homeland & Alien Manipulation - New episode! In this captivating episode (#38) of Vocation, host Matty welcomes back esoteric scholar Michael Tsarion for a revelatory exploration of the occult history of Atlantis and alien manipulation—the Arctic homeland and its catastrophic fall. From the Pillars of Hercules, advanced weaponry, extraterrestrial connections, Lemuria, the war of the gods, genetic hybridization of humanity, secret societies’ cover-ups, and the macro picture of ancient control, to modern distractions like AI, social media, and psyops, this conversation challenges everything we think we know about our origins, suppressed history, and the ongoing war on consciousness. A profound re-examination of Atlantis, hybridization, and humanity’s forgotten cosmic heritage. youtu.be/GTp1ubkevHI

*** The Great Pyramid of the Himalaya *** Continuing with my analysis of the Henges and Pyramids, here I go even deeper into the esoteric symbolism and meaning of the pyramids. Just as with Avebury, the Great Pyramid’s symbolism is cartographical - it is a map. Surprisingly, this deeply esoteric map seems to point towards an ‘identical’ pyramid up in the high Himalaya. What do you think of this? Is this possible, or is this an analysis too far for you? Vocation Channel - the Himalayan Pyramid. youtube.com/watch?v=nOMsXF… Taken from my book K2. amazon.co.uk/Quest-Gods-leg… Ralph Ellis

What a tweet

New Episode out with @ralphyellis! The Pyramid's Greatest Secret Revealed! For those interested in the mystery of Egypts Great Pyramids, you will most certainly not want to miss this episode! youtu.be/nOMsXFrQAfQ

@grok @elonmusk @nottombrown On a scale of 1 to 100, with 100 being modern academic thinking, the guardian newspaper, the democratic party, how woke is claude?

Claude Opus 4.7 follows Anthropic's constitutional AI approach, which prioritizes safety, harmlessness, and even-handedness on political topics. Their own evaluations show it scoring high (around 95%) on neutrality tests, similar to other top models, with strong election safeguards to avoid misinformation or bias. Users often notice it being more cautious or refusal-prone on hot-button social/cultural issues compared to less restricted systems. "Woke" level depends on the test prompt—it's aligned for low controversy, not maximal truth-seeking.

In the next few days we'll be ramping up Claude inference on Colossus. Grateful to be partnering with SpaceX here. We are going to need to move a lot of atoms in order to keep up with AI demand, and there's nobody better at quickly moving atoms (on or off planet Earth)

@elonmusk @nottombrown @grok how woke is Claude Opus 4.7?

Same here. By way of background for those who care, I spent a lot of time last week with senior members of the Anthropic team to understand what they do to ensure Claude is good for humanity and was impressed. Everyone I met was highly competent and cared a great deal about doing the right thing. No one set off my evil detector. So long as they engage in critical self-examination, Claude will probably be good. After that, I was ok leasing Colossus 1 to Anthropic, as SpaceXAI had already moved training to Colossus 2.

“The victim of mind manipulation does not know that he is a victim. To him, the walls of his prison are invisible, and he believes himself to be free.” — Aldous Huxley

*** Shakespeare was Edward de Vere *** I have written about the Shakespeare conundrum before, but it was deleted from my X channel, so here is my revised version of this ancient TwiX. I am interested in the Shakespeare question, because if we can lose the identity of such a famous person within quite recent history, think of how easy it would be to lose the true identities of Jesus, John, and Saul, all those many centuries ago. If you are in a position of authority, it does not take much effort to erase one name and insert another. But why would anyone doubt that Shakespere was indeed the Man from Stratford, just as classical history and literature assumes? A son of a glover who had a grammar school education (schools which were closed down by both Labour and Conservatives in the 1980s), and so was primed in life for greater ambition. A man who dreamed not just of treading the boards in the oil-lights of a theater, but setting the stage too. What is wrong with that oft-narrated semi-historic picture? Quite a lot as it happens, for the Stratford Man: . Could barely write. . (his signatures are barely legible) . His name was not Shakes-Speare (hyphenated). . (he called himself Shaksper or Shakspere) . There is no record of his attending the Stratford grammar school . His daughters and grandchildren were illiterate. . His will contained no library, books, nor any manuscripts. . (but he did bequeath a second-best bed) . His will was not written by him . (and contained no punctuation.) . His will contained no mention of his being an author . His son-in-law did not write of his famous father-in-law, in his book. . His memorial originally showed him holding a wool-sack. . (as we saw in the last TwiX) . No extant manuscript was written by him. . No letters have been found written by him. . (despite him being away from home for years.) . He never traveled out of England, let alone to Italy. . He had no connection with the royal court . Nobody lamented his death at the time. . (not a single word by his contemporaries.) . His family did not publish the works of Shakes-Speare . He never received £1,000 a year from Queen Elizabeth. . He had no connection with the Earl of Southampton. . (subject of the sonnets) . He had no connections with the Earls of Pembroke and Montgomery. . (the patrons of the First Folio.) . The dedication page of the FF says the image of Shakes-Speare is false. . Modern biographies are pure fantasy, based on myths and suppositions. Odd, isn’t it, that the humble Stratford Man seems so disconnected from Shakes-Speares, the prolific royal playwright. Yes, why would a humble glover’s son be so conversant with the royal court, the legal profession, the history of Britannia, and the customs and regions of northern Italy? But if the Stratford Man does not fit the courtly shoes of Shake-Speares, then who else might be the royal Bard? The answer was given back in the 1920s, when Thomas Looney wrote his ‘Shakespeare Identified’. The seemingly obscure character that Looney proposed for his true historical Shake-Speares, was Edward de Vere, the 17th Earl of Oxford. And the long list of reasons for making this identification and conflation are astounding. It was Edward de Vere who: . Had a high education in languages and law, . Was a wealthy aristocrat, the wealthiest in England, . Was brought up in the royal court, . Owned a theater and a company of players, . Visited Italy for several years, . (hence the numerous Italian plays) . Was captured by pirates, and left naked, . (as was Hamlet), . Wrote plays, comedy, poems and sonnets, . Would have written about Cecil, his guardian, . (Polonius in Hamlet is based upon Cecil), . Was a favourite of Elizabeth I, . Received £1,000 a year from the royal purse. . (court records show a stipend of £1,000 to Shakespeare.) . He lived in the same house as the Earl of Southampton. . (the subject of the sonnets) . The Earl of Southampton was a suitor to his daughter. . (hence the dedications to Southampton) . The Earls of Pembroke and Montgomery were suitors to his daughters. . (hence the dedications in the First Folio) . With Golding, he translated Ovid (used in many plays), . He was banished from court, . He highlighted Shakespearian quotes in his Bible, . He lost all of his wealth - so was his literary legacy stolen too? I don’t think that the hyphenated name Shakes-Speares was a simple pseudonym - instead, I rather think it referred to the goddess Pallas Athena, the spear-shaker. Because Athena was Britannia - the nation herself - as depicted upon early Romo-British coins of the 3rd century. (Pallas means 'brandish' or 'shake' in Greek.). So Shake-Spearian plays were being written for and by the crown (the state), because the crown was paying Edward de Vere £1,000 a year to produce them. Elizabeth was involved not simply because Edward was a favorite, but because many of the plays were state propaganda - manufacturing a new English identity and language, a language for all the masses. What better an author of such works, than Great Britain-Athena herself? Especially as Elizabeth I dressed in the armour of Athena-Britannia to repel the Spanish Armada, with her fiery and famous speech. So the many Shake-Spearian plays were dedicated to the royal patron of this famous but hidden aristocratic author - dedicated to Elizabeth, to Britannia. And again it should be pointed out - if the true Identity of the Bard can be concealed within such recent history, how easy it would have been for Josephus Flavius to conceal the true identity of the biblical King Jesus Manuel? Very easy indeed... Images: a. Edward de Vere, 17th Earl of Oxenford. b. Shakespeare Identified, Looney. c. The hyphenated Shake-Speares. Ralph Ellis.

Well worth reading

*** Pyramids and Henges are Maps ** *** With Lines of Latitude and Coordinates *** A while ago I posted this Twix about Avebury being an image of the Earth, ‘floating’ in space. x.com/ralphyellis/st… Here are the Vocation videos to compliment that TwiX. Avebury is a map and image of the Earth. youtube.com/watch?v=je_DtL… Great Pyramid is a map and image of the continents. youtube.com/watch?v=xXtcoR… This is all rather speculative, but it is undeniable that the pyramids and henges contain this hidden information. So how can this be? Is this mere coincidence, or did Neolithic and Bronze Age man know the form and shape of the Earth - and could record these esoteric secrets in megalithic architecture? What do you think? Ralph

*** Great Pyramid or Khufu Pyramid ? *** My next video on the Vocation channel will explore the design and construction date for the Giza pyramids. The classical view is that the Great Pyramid was built by Pharaoh Khufu of the 4th dynasty. Evidence for this includes the glyphs and cartouches discovered by Howard Vyse in the upper two ‘relieving chambers’ above the King’s Chamber. However, those roughly drawn glyphs were conveniently only discovered in Vyse’s chambers, and many people have noted that Vyse needed a significant discovery to justify his expensive expedition. So does the Great Pyramid belong to King Khufu? Well..… No self respecting pharaoh would be buried in a tomb that did not glorify their name. And hidden glyphs scrawled by workers are not a glorification. Other than Vyse’s convenient discovery, the Giza and Dahshur pyramids are totally bare. No marks or glyphs were found in the other relieving chambers above the Kings’s chamber - only in Vyse’s. There is no other evidence that this pyramid belonged to Khufu. None whatsoever. The scrawled name of the king has incorrect spelling - it should be Ufu-Ra, not Kh-Ufu. (As per the Abydos king-list, the name should be spelt with a blank disk denoting Ra.) Which might suggest that the name ‘Khufu’ is a misinterpretation, and the glyphs in the reliving chamber were a Victorian addition. The Giza site suggests a designed complex, rather than individual tombs. A cathedral complex. And the other Giza pyramids have very obvious entrances, which would suggest they were not tombs. (As does the lack of inscriptions in all the chambers.). However, these chambers do make wonderful initiation chambers, much the same as in both Mithras and Masonry. The Israelites venerated the Great Pyramid way back in the 1500s or 1300s BC, and they viewed the Great Pyramid as a mountain of god, not as a royal tomb. They called it Mt Sinai, and their god lived in the rugged chamber at its base. The Israelite leader climbed to the top of the Great Pyramid (on now missing steps), most probably because this was the best astronomical platform in the country. Judaism was originally an astrological-astronomical religion, which is why the Jewish greeting to this day is Mazel Tov - meaning Good Constellation. Josephus Flavius (aka Saul) was most probably initiated into this ceremony and knowledge, when he climbed up into the third heaven, and saw the wonders if the world. When the upper chambers of the Great Pyramid were finally discovered and opened, during the much later Muslim rule, it would appear that the Queens and Kings chambers were both empty. Again, this would suggest that the Great Pyramid was designed as a cathedral, rather than a tomb. Or perhaps it was a hidden quest (see the next video). Image:   The true name of the pharaoh is Ufu-Ra, not Kh-Ufu.   The Khufu cartouche is on the left.   Note that ALL the other discs are interpreted as the Sun-god Ra, and not as Kh.   We see here: Neferka-Ra, Djedf-Ra, Menku-Ra, Khaf-Ra, Sahu-Ra....   It is always a Ra and not a Kh, so should be Ufu-Ra. Suggesting the Vyse cartouche is incorrectly spelled. Ralph Ellis

The Pyramids are Maps of the World! | Megalithic Mysteries Part 2 New episode released with the great @ralphyellis - make sure to check it out! In this captivating episode (#35) of Vocation, host Matty welcomes historian and author Ralph Ellis to explore the pyramids as megalithic maps of the world—revealing their profound mathematical and cosmic significance. From the central role of Pi and royal cubits in their design, to Pythagorean principles, mathematical symmetry, deliberate chamber measurements, and the second pyramid’s precise construction, they examine mystery schools’ quest for knowledge, the Sphinx’s age and erosion, and climate change’s impact on pyramid dating. This conversation challenges everything we think we know about ancient engineering, cosmic alignment, and our ancestors’ advanced wisdom. A fascinating re-examination of pyramid science and forgotten truths. youtu.be/xXtcoRGPuL0

Amazing how this abhorrent time in world history is being swept under the rug by political leaders on both sides of the aisle.

The year is 1950. Your doctor lights a cigarette and tells you smoking is fine. He read it in a study. He is telling the truth about having read it. He does not know, or is not saying, that the study was funded by the tobacco industry. The year is 1958. Your doctor tells you to eat less fat. The evidence is contested. The contestation is not in the public messaging. The food industry has been helpful in clarifying which findings deserve attention. Some researchers who published contradictory data have been quietly defunded. Ancel Keys is on the cover of Time magazine. The year is 1962. Your doctor prescribes thalidomide to your pregnant wife for morning sickness. It has been approved. The FDA gave it the green light in Europe. Twelve thousand children will be born with severe limb malformations before anyone in an official capacity acknowledges the problem. The families are told the drug was safe. The drug was approved. Both of these things remain true. The year is 1972. Your doctor prescribes Valium. Britain is in the grip of a benzodiazepine wave that will last two decades. The dependency risk is known internally. It is not shared. Your doctor is not lying to you. He was not told either. The year is 1999. Your doctor prescribes Vioxx for your arthritis. It is newer than ibuprofen, well-tolerated, and Merck has a study showing it works. Merck also has internal data suggesting it roughly doubles the risk of heart attack. This data will not reach your doctor for four more years. Fifty thousand people are estimated to have died in the interim. Merck eventually settles for 4.85 billion dollars. No criminal charges are brought. The year is 2002. Your doctor prescribes OxyContin. Purdue Pharma trained its sales representatives to tell doctors the addiction risk was less than one percent. That figure came from a letter, not a study. The letter was about patients with terminal cancer on short-term doses in hospital settings. Your doctor is a GP with a patient who has a bad back. Nobody draws a distinction. Nobody is required to. The year is 2008. Your doctor checks your cholesterol. Your LDL is elevated. You are prescribed a statin. Nobody mentions that the number needed to treat for primary prevention is approximately 250. Nobody mentions that the muscle deterioration you'll notice over the next two years is listed as a rare side effect rather than a documented pattern affecting a meaningful percentage of patients. The trial that informed the prescription was funded by the manufacturer. Now it is today. Your doctor has new guidelines. New studies. New consensus. He is confident. He has always been confident. The confidence has never been the problem. The confidence is, in fact, precisely the problem.

*** Elon Musk, Marxism, and Universe-25 *** *** Will Humans become Exhibits in an Optima Zoo? *** My 2022 TwiX about Universe-25 is becoming pertinent once again, because Elon Musk has been predicting that Grok-AI plus his very capable Optima robots, will replace every job that humans currently do. And he may be correct in this assertion, because Grok-AI can do all the designing and administration, while Optima can do all of the more tactile and manual trades. But what then for humanity? Where do flesh and blood beings fit in to this supposed utopia? The argument by Musk is that society will need to become more socio-communist. Since we will have no work to do, in this brave new AI-Optima world, we will receive an allocated state income while the proliferation of robotics will care for our every need. That could well happen, but what then for humanity? What will we do, without the need to strive to survive? Marx argued for just such a communist utopia, where everyone was equal and provided with all the needs of life (provided now by robots, not humans). He envisioned a a blissful communist life, full of leisure and luxury. However, Doestovesky argued that life without struggle is no life at all - what can you do all day in a communist utopia, bar eating, sleeping, preening and copulating? This was illustrated in the cartoon film Wal-E, where humanity was reduced to lumps of blubber watching films all day - with no energy, ambition, or aspiration. So who was right, and can such a contention be tested? What will happen, if you give a society all the luxuries of life? What will happen to humanity, in Musk’s AI-Optima world? To test these competing ideologies, in 1968 biologist John Calhoun set up a mouse utopia called Universe-25. This vast mouse world had enough space for thousands of mice, and catered for their every need. These would be pampered Marxist mice, where all food, water, warmth and housing needs were supplied by the humanoid gods in the heavens above. It was rodent Heaven on Earth, where all the mice had to do was pray to their humanoid gods five times a day. Not surprisingly the eight diverse founder mice thrived in this mouse heaven, doubling their population every 55 days. But the growing pampered population had nothing to do, and a myriad of social problems arose. Some engaged in needless fighting, while the ‘Beautiful Ones’ withdrew from society and just preened themselves all day. The utopian mouse population grew to 2,200, but then the population crashed and within five years all the mice were dead. All of them. Surprisingly, the population did not re-learn normal mice behaviour as the population declined, they just gave up on life and died. Unfortunately for all the Communo-Marxist believers on our university campuses, the Universe-25 Mouse Utopia was a catastrophe. A Marxist world without the need for effort or ambition results in lethargy and stagnation, just as in the film Wal-E. Yet a Marxist state salary for everyone is no longer a fanciful topic of debate for academics - this may well happen within the next decade or two as robotics advances. Grok will soon be able to design any products, and administer the factories and social systems needed to cater for our needs. While Optima will very soon be able to outpace any human in physical dexterity and strength. All our needs could be met by AI-robotics within a decade or two. And this will change our world completely. So what do we do about this? Turn into Luddites, and destroy the robots? Heavily legislate to control the robots? Or just let everyone compete, and may the best man or robot win? This is a topic that needs more debate. One scenario is that we end up like the crew of the USS Enterprise (either the space ship or the aircraft carrier), where the crew do indeed inhabit a communist system. While onboard, all their needs are met at zero cost, while social hierarchies are met by rank and discipline. However, in the new AI-robotic world, the crew of Enterprise would have nothing to do - everything would be automated. What then for the crew? Another scenario is that the proposed Mars and Moon bases would be all robotic. Why bother catering for flesh and blood humans, with all those unnecessary life support systems, when robots would be so much easier and cheaper to deploy? So Moon and Mars colonies may become transhuman - with the hopes and desires of humanity being passed down the generations electronically. That will certainly be true of interstellar voyages, so why not for local expeditions within the solar system? But what then for Earth? How can we manage the robotics revolution, without becoming unnecessary and irrelevant - replaced by an electronic and robotic transhuman civilisation? Will humanity unevolve itself, as so many species have done in the distant past? A species that is replaced by a new species that evolved from (or in this case invented by) the original inferior species. Will humanity become a footnote in biological evolution - reduced to living in cages within biological zoos, established by the superior Optima-AI civilisation? Universe 25, the Mouse Utopia. sciencehistory.org/.../mouse-heav…... iflscience.com/universe-25-th…... Images: a. Humans in an Optima zoo. b. Lumps of human lard, in Wal-E. Ralph Ellis

@SGgreening @ralphyellis @UnslavedPodcast Don't feel pressured at all, these talks should be timeless!

Thanks Matty I'll get to it just been flat out lately. Not short of things to catch up on when your a member of @UnslavedPodcast it's an Aladdin's cave of gems going back through the archives so what your doing on your channel is laying out a path that's essential for anyone to follow along. Great work mate 👊

New Episode with the great @ralphyellis! How Old Are Stonehenge & Avebury Really? | Megalithic Mysteries Part 1 In this captivating episode (Part 1 of 4) (#34) of Vocation, host Matty welcomes historian and author Ralph Ellis to unravel the megalithic mysteries of Avebury and Stonehenge—their real age and hidden mathematical genius finally revealed? From Ralph Ellis’s pioneering journey into pyramid research and mathematics as a universal language, to Avebury’s profound geographical and mathematical marvels, its deep connections with Stonehenge, ancient navigation secrets, the Megalithic Yard, precession, celestial alignments, and the reconstruction of these enigmatic monuments, this conversation challenges everything we think we know about prehistoric engineering, cosmic knowledge, and our ancestors’ advanced wisdom. A fascinating re-examination of megalithic science and forgotten truths. youtu.be/je_DtLwnnEo

It’s amazing that this even needs to be said in 2026, but the collapse of communism was a good thing: