
abdul
1.4K posts

abdul
@abdul1877376
Yes, I use zionist as a codeword for Jew to avoid censorship on this app. They already shadow banned my account so I need to choose my words carefully.


🚨#BREAKING: A BLACK WOMAN HAS JUST SHOT TWO ATTORNEYS OUTSIDE OF THE RALEIGH NC COURTHOUSE IN BROAD DAYLIGHT. MULTIPLE GUNSHOT WOUNDS REPORTED. ONE ATTORNEY, A WOMAN, IS CURRENTLY IN SURGERY FIGHTING FOR HER LIFE!!! PLEASE PRAY!!! WE DO NOT HAVE TO LIVE LIKE THIS!!!!!!





@mehdirhasan Wait immigrants can vote?


@TheBrancaShow @TheBrancaShow oh how quickly the tides turn… 2 days ago you said Chud should expect to be assaulted and had no grounds for self defense if he used a “racial slur.” You finally seeing wtf is really going on? Wake up white man.

He was asking to get his ass whooped 👀😳What are you doing in this situation?






People are crying about this video when white people literally enslaved people.


People are crying about this video when white people literally enslaved people.


White people talk all this smack and can never defend themselves.


The white boy will never say the N word again.












Notice how this “lawyer” framed his arguments by just assuming the antagonist was Joshua Fox? His entire legal opinion is predicated on a presumption that Dalton (Chud) did absolutely nothing to provoke the other guy, and even if we knew nothing about either party involved, that would still be a weak argument considering there’s no video released of the altercation. A good lawyer would probably say “this affidavit shows the prosecutors took other variables into consideration for the charges, because a bladed stance and reaching for a gun CAN be a treated as a threat of bodily harm depending on the situation, and they probably believe Joshua Fox may have been the one acting in self defense.” Granted, making assumptions on who the aggressor was works both ways and anyone presuming Chud provoked THIS encounter are also making an assumption without hard evidence. However, those people have a REASONABLE assumption considering there’s countless hours of video where Chud is provoking OTHER people on live stream. There’s also video of Chud and tweets saying he’s gonna kill someone and get off because he will argue self defense, making the assumption even greater that he was the aggressor and this could be pre meditated. Bottom line is this affidavit doesn’t show anything other than the prosecutors believe Chud was the aggressor and thats why he has those charges. They’ve seen the security footage and we haven’t, and just blindly assuming they saw he did nothing wrong and locked him up anyway based on this affidavit is nothing more than conjecture.






