Abhishek Ajish
176 posts

Abhishek Ajish
@abhisheikkkh
Carpediem!
Sharjah, United Arab Emirates Katılım Ağustos 2017
204 Takip Edilen13 Takipçiler

Mr. Cricket ruled over the league that season! 🙌
Comment 'option A) 733' or 'option B) 753' to answer Question 1 and get an entry into the Vi 5G fanfest contest today!
Here's what you could win 👇
🎟️ CSK match tickets
👕 Vi x CSK merch
Play more on the Vi app and boost your chances. Link in bio.
#Vi #Vi5G #CSK #Vi5Gfanfest

English

A much-talked-about decision in the league. 🥲
Comment 'option A) Pandya' or 'option B) Sky' to answer Question 2 and get an entry into the Vi 5G fanfest contest today!
Level up to win 🌟
🎟️ CSK match tickets
👕 Vi x CSK merch
Play more on the Vi app and increase your chances to win. Link in bio.
#Vi #Vi5G #CSK #Vi5Gfanfest

English

This batters sixes and fours lit up stadiums all across India! 🏟️
Comment 'option A) Sky' or 'option B) Pandya' to answer Question 2 and get an entry into the Vi 5G fanfest contest today!
Level up to win 🌟
🎟️ CSK match tickets
👕 Vi x CSK merch
Play more on the Vi app and increase your chances to win. Link in bio.
#Vi #Vi5G #CSK #Vi5Gfanfest

English

@ReplySensei GT. We need RR to lose since we can’t control RR’s fate anymore. GT winning is fine as we have a higher NRR than them and us beating them is enough to go above them.
So RR losing and us beating GT means we go above both RR and GT(considering we dont fumble in other games)
English

💛Chat CSKians, Who are we backing tonight in #RRvsGT clash and how would it help us ?!..
English

@ReplySensei Nervous but positive. If they dont blow off our top order in powerplay we’ll be fine. Big game, hope we do well
English

A few minutes to go for the toss and an hour for the match to begin #DCvsCSK !!..
Chat CSKians, How are you feeling about today's game ?!...
Thoughts ?!👇
English

@AadityaN_28 My take is he provides something that CSK’s attack really lacks. Proper 145+ pace. Yes it’s a punt but it’s a move to build an attack with more variety.
English

Obviously Johnson is a hugely talented and has great potential, but punting on a guy who hasn't played competitive cricket for a year is some bravery from CSK...
IndianPremierLeague@IPL
🚨 News 🚨 @ChennaiIPL pick a player replacement for the injured Nathan Ellis for the upcoming #TATAIPL. More details 🔽 iplt20.com/news/4254/spen…
English

@RcbianOfficial x.com/rcbianofficial…
You guys are like Pakistan. If IPL wasn’t telecasted live RCB would have had 5 IPL trophies now😭
Fan RCBians@RcbianOfficial
Biggest fanbases :- Movies - KGF Cricket - Virat Kohli IPL - RCB
English

@imkevin149 Dont worry, you guys won’t even make it there:))
English

@JunaidKhanation Idk why everyone saying MI. Their batting is GOATed but bowling minus Bumrah is very very weak. Boult looked washed in SA20. Literally noone else to be worried of.
English

@saad_arif929 @kartik_kannan “Pak has changed” joke of 2026. Pakistan is and never will be a safe country. A country that funds terrorism and blasts bombs every other week can never claim to have changed. There’s a reason why they have to promise visiting nations with “presidential security” even now.
English

@kartik_kannan 2009-2016 was a tough period, yes
But things change. Pak has changed. They've earned the trust of the public
Which is why now, teams have been constantly visiting Pakistan
Tell it as it is
BCCI doesn't want Pak to benefit from having ind team there
Nothing to do with security
English

I happened to watch Nasser Hussain's comments along with Mike Atherton on the Sky Sports Podcast. These are people that I'd love listening to on most days. Like a cricket player has his off days, I am guessing they had theirs. I clearly did not agree with their line of thinking
If you are asking, Ab Nass ne kya bola, let me first summarise that
Double Standards: Nasser argued that the ICC lacks consistency. He asked: "If India said our government does not want us to go... would the ICC have been so firm and say 'bad luck, we're knocking you out'?"
They imply India gets special treatment while Bangladesh gets punished.
Praise for "Rebellion": Nasser explicitly stated, "I actually quite like Bangladesh sticking to their guns... and I quite like Pakistan sticking up for Bangladesh."
He views this as necessary resistance against the "politics" dominating the game.
Financial Bullying: They acknowledged the Indian argument ("We generate the money"), but countered that "with power comes responsibility," arguing that India is actively diminishing other cricket nations.
Ok, having heard this. What seems wrong about this? Let me talk further on this.
Phir Se, The "False Equivalence" of Security
The Argument: Nasser compares Bangladesh refusing to tour India with India refusing to tour Pakistan.
This is a false equivalence. India’s refusal to tour Pakistan is backed by decades of documented security threats and the fact that major international teams refused to tour Pakistan for ten years (2009–2019) due to terrorism. That has not happened in India ever in the last 30-32 years. The last I remember a team doing that was Pak in 1991(Wills Cup) and 1993 (Hero Cup)
In contrast, the ICC’s independent security experts assessed the threat level in India for Bangladesh and found it safe. Bangladesh’s refusal was a diplomatic stance, not a genuine security necessity, despite India rocking the boat with the Fiz incident.
The ICC cannot treat a "political boycott" (Bangladesh) the same as a "verified security threat" (India regarding Pakistan). Yeh dono same nahi hain.
2. Economic Reality vs. Bias
The Argument: They claim the ICC is biased because they wouldn't "knock out" India.
Yaar, ye bias ki baat bahi hain;, it's existential reality. India generates roughly 80-90% of global cricket revenue. A World Cup without Bangladesh is unfortunate but financially survivable.
A World Cup without India would bankrupt the ICC and, by extension, cut funding for smaller nations (including the West Indies and associate nations).
The ICC isn't "favoring" India; they are protecting the financial engine that subsidizes the rest of the world.
Also, if you remember even for the Feb-March 2025 Champions Trophy, India had had a consistent stance from 2024 that they are not willing to play in Pakistan. They did not drop a bomb a month before the tournament like Pakistan and Bangladesh have done in the T20 World Cup 2026. India honoured their part, played the match, did not mess with tournament revenue guarantees to ICC
England are just sore that they are not the financial engine or nerve centre. All they have for primacy argument is that they have the MCC that drafts the laws. Nothing else on the economic forefront, which makes them a leader. Today it makes it cool to get the Pak and Bangladeshi fan base for a few brownie points on X, for speaking against India/BCCI. Nas and Athers are trying to milk a few singles here, when no one is watching.
3. The "Protective" Nature of the IPL Decision
The Argument: They frame the release of Mustafizur Rahman as a punitive/political move by the BCCI.
Given the volatile atmosphere and the reports of violence against minorities in Bangladesh, the BCCI could argue they could not guarantee Mustafizur's safety from potential protestors or isolated incidents in India. Releasing him could be viewed as a protective measure to de-escalate tension, rather than a malicious political sanction. Keeping him in India during such a diplomatic crisis would have been a higher security risk, given that the IPL is the world's biggest revenue generating event. It has seen protests in Chennai over Sri Lankan players in a squad for a political party's preference of treatment to Sri Lankan Tamil's. While such a move could have been avoided, the IPL did what it needed to do, to reduce unwanted negative talk with escalating tensions in Bangladesh and India.
4. Selective Solidarity (The Pakistan Boycott)
The Argument: Nasser praises Pakistan's "solidarity."
This is where I go, 'Dei, Yeppudu ra ipdi solraan' .
If PCB were truly acting on principle or solidarity, they would boycott the entire tournament. By choosing to play all other matches but forfeit only the game against India, they are proving that their decision is a political stunt rather than a moral stand. You cannot claim to be "sticking up for cricket" while selectively politicizing the sport's biggest fixture. They are also doing that knowing that they make another half of what is cricket's most prized rivalry, so they feel they can extract their share of the flesh, by doing all these pull-out tactics, despite being beggars. India is playing Ind-Pak contests in neutral venues, as a means to fund international cricket and Asian Cricket. One India-Pak match a year, can make other boards and associates meet their end
I have seen many comments highlight that "Equality in law applies to equals." You cannot treat the primary stakeholder (India) identically to smaller stakeholders when the survival of the ecosystem depends on the former. There is a reason England (6.89%) draw more money out of the ICC revenue pool than say Pakistan (5.75%) or Bangladesh (4.4%) or Zimbabwe (2.9%). Would England be okay, sacrificing their revenue so that Zimbabwe and Bangladesh prosper? Sure, you paint BCCI as the villain, but would you be willing to forego your money to be distributed to the rest equally (2.9%), so that the game can grow?
Also going back to the Fizz thing, as far as I know no Bangladeshi player has ever been attacked in India, whereas the Sri Lankan team was attacked in Pakistan. Therefore, Bangladesh's "security concern" holds less water than India's, and everyone could see through the politics that Pak and BD were playing. Wrong timing and stage to pull these unwanted stunts.
And, if I were to move to another sport as a parallel. Dear Nas- you say you 'like Bangladesh sticking to their guns' against India. But where was this energy when Wimbledon banned every Russian/Belarussian player in 2022 purely due to government politics around Russia invading Ukraine? Or when the English FA supported banning Russian football teams from traveling to the UK?
The UK set the precedent that 'Sport IS Politics' when national security or values are at stake. You cannot support banning Russians from London because of a war, but then call India 'bullies' for refusing to play Pakistan due to cross-border terrorism. That is the definition of a double standard, or playing down the wrong-line.
I expect better from Nass and Athers. We respect you here in India. These points did not make sense guys. Looking forward to better content to listen on my commute back home.

English

@bholination Only winning IPL 5 times will give you the chance to win it for the 6th time. Ever thought of how it feels to win it 5 times? :))
English

Imagine the pain of Dhoni fans. They were in the top 4, hoping for a back to back trophy and a perfect retirement for Dhoni as the greatest IPL captain with 6 trophies. Then out of nowhere, the team they hate the most came from the bottom and brutally kicked them out of the top 4. Since then, they haven’t recovered and still waiting for revenge. And we’re kicking their asses again and again. This is peak IPL 🤣🤣
s@CaptainDeMio
Still a mystery how RCB pulled off qualification for ipl 2024 from this situation absolute god's plan 🥶
English

@bholination Failure in domestics? He scored two 100s in SMAT you blind hater
English

Meet CSK blood Ayush Mhatre:
- Failed in the U19 Asia Cup (whole tournament)
- Failed badly against SENA teams in Youth ODI series
- Failed in the first U19 WC 2026 match
- Failed in the second U19 WC match today
- Failure in domestics untill now
And this guy is the captain of the Indian team and the biggest liability and threat to our chances of winning the u19 WC

English















