brrabski

We should not forget the impact that Jordan Peterson had in arming us with arguments against progressives. Nobody mainstream was able to do it like him.

kendini aç bırakarak zayıflayanları bekleyen sürpriz

It Was Never About Iran or Venezuela: It’s About Weakening China, and It’s Brilliant China’s economic ascent is tethered to a critical vulnerability: its reliance on foreign oil. Importing over 70% of its oil, China depends heavily on a few key suppliers. This reliance creates a strategic opportunity for the U.S. By influencing Iran and Venezuela, two of the world’s top holders of oil reserves, the U.S. can exert direct or indirect influence over their trade partnerships, thereby tightening China’s energy supply. Key Points: • Venezuela: Ranked 1st globally, holding around 17–18% of the world’s proven oil reserves. • Saudi Arabia: Ranked 2nd, holding about 15–16% of global reserves. Although an ally, their reserves are pivotal. • Iran: Ranked 3rd, holding around 12% of the world’s proven oil reserves. Combined, these three countries hold ~45% of the world’s proven oil reserves. Strategic Moves with a Broader Aim While the public narrative focuses on removing dictators, curbing drug trafficking, and neutralizing Iran’s nuclear threat, the overarching strategy is clear. Ensuring these nations are not under the influence of U.S. adversaries limits China’s ability to secure its energy needs. Take Venezuela. Yes, drug trafficking into the United States is a serious issue. But Mexico remains the primary corridor for narcotics entering America, and China has played a documented role in supplying precursor chemicals that fuel the fentanyl crisis. Neither country faced comparable military intervention. If drugs were the sole driver, the strategic map would look very different. Now consider Iran. Stopping nuclear proliferation is a legitimate national security objective. Yet North Korea already possesses nuclear weapons and continues advancing its missile capabilities. The United States has not pursued direct regime removal there. The difference is not the level of authoritarianism or even the nuclear threat. The difference is strategic energy leverage. This strategic foresight is what makes the move consequential. By focusing on two nations that sit atop massive oil reserves and that have served as energy lifelines to China, the U.S. does more than remove hostile regimes. It reshapes global energy influence. The effect is subtle but powerful. Direct control is not required. Influence over leadership, trade policy, or export alignment can be enough to alter who benefits from nearly half of the world’s proven oil reserves. While the world debates the immediate justifications for U.S. actions in Iran and Venezuela, the broader picture reveals a calculated effort to weaken America’s primary competitor. Removing dictators matters. Stopping drug pipelines matters. Containing nuclear threats matters. But the main plot is strategic pressure on China. And seen through that lens, the move is not reckless. It is deliberate. And it is brilliant.